23.2 C
Accra
Saturday, August 2, 2025
WorldThe Supreme Court has ruled that transgender student-athletes in West Virginia may...

Date:

The Supreme Court has ruled that transgender student-athletes in West Virginia may play on girls’ teams

Although a lawsuit challenging a statewide ban is being heard by an appeals court, the US Supreme Court found that a transgender girl can compete on her middle school’s track team.

West Virginia’s prohibition on transgender sports, which was passed into law in 2021, is being challenged in court by Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 12-year-old transgender pupil there.

According to the Preserve Women’s Sports Act, a person’s ability to join an athletic team “must be purely based on the individual’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.”

Students who are born male can play on male and coed teams, whereas students who are born female can participate on male, female, and coed teams, according to the law.

Pepper-Jackson challenged the law a month after it was passed in 2021. She received support from the American Civil Liberties Union and Lambda Legal, an LGBTQ+ civil rights group.

Her lawyers argued that West Virginia’s law violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as federal civil rights law under Title IX – which prohibits sex-based discrimination.

A district court in Charleston, West Virginia initially sided with the state, but Pepper-Jackson appealed the case.

The Fourth US Circuit Court of Appeals is currently considering her lawsuit. During this process, the court ruled Pepper-Jackson can continue competing on the girls’ team.

West Virginia’s Attorney General Patrick Morrissey filed an emergency appeal, asking the Supreme Court to intervene before oral arguments were heard.

The Supreme Court refused to overturn the Circuit Court’s ruling, paving the way for Pepper-Jackson to continue competing in the current outdoor track season.

The court provided no reasoning for its decision.

Only two justices dissented, conservatives Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.

‘Enforcement of the law at issue should not be forbidden by the federal courts without any explanation,’ Justice Alito wrote in his dissenting opinion.

[forminator_poll id="710479"]

Latest stories

“Don’t make me and Stonebwoy fight ooo”- Samini warn netizens

Veteran dancehall musician, Samini has warned netizens to resist...

Kanye West’s Heil Hitler song bans him from entering Australia

US rapper Kanye West has been banned from entering...

Agradaa describes moment shared with President Mahama heavenly – Agradaa

Evangelist Patricia Asiedua, popularly known as Agradaa, shared a...

Dada Joe Remix extradited to face romance scam charges in USA

Ghana’s nightlife mogul and alleged crypto kingpin, Nana Kojo...

Govt launches 24-Hour Economy policy today

The government's flagship, 24-Hour Economy Policy, will be launched...

GRA sets July 16 for GHS1 fuel levy implementation

The implementation of the new GHS1 Energy Sector Shortfall...

Related stories

US travel ban against Togo, Libya, others takes effect today

Effective today, Monday, June 9, nationals of twelve countries...

Pakistan: Police in search of over 200 inmates following earth tremor

Over 200 inmates are currently on the run after...

Pope Leo XIV shares canonical acceptance

Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost has officially accepted his election...

Profile of the new Pope – Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost

"Peace be with all of you!" - the first...

Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost named as the 267th Pope, takes the name Pope Leo XIV

Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost has been elected as the...

Black smoke signals end of first day of conclave to elect new pope

A thick column of black smoke rising from the...

Siemens exec and his family involved in fatal Hudson helicopter crash

Tragedy struck New York City on Thursday when a...