Mark Harper advises unions to “think again” about their industrial action after the RMT’s most recent poll revealed that nearly 40% of respondents would accept the offer on the table.
According to Transport Secretary Mark Harper, the trend is shifting among rail unions in regards to the pay proposals that are being considered.
Yesterday, 64% of RMT members rejected Network Rail’s most recent offer, with general secretary Mick Lynch describing it as “substandard.”
The agreement would have increased pay by 5% and 4% over the course of two years, but it would also have resulted in thousands of job losses, a 50% reduction in scheduled maintenance tasks, and a 30% increase in unsocial hours.
However, Mr Harper said it had more support than previous offers on the table, urging the union to “look at it again, call off the strikes and accept what is a reasonable pay offer”.
Rail workers have staged another walkout today in the first of a raft of strike days in this month, covering 13, 14 and 16 and 17 December.
More strikes are also planned from 6pm on Christmas Eve to 5.59am on 27 December.
Speaking to Sky News, Mr Harper said the government has “got to be fair to the taxpayer”, adding: “There isn’t a bottomless pit of money to go into the rail industry.”
He insisted the offer made to workers was “very fair and reasonable”, and pointed to the fact bosses of the TSSA union – which represents station staff – had already recommended it to their members.
“Even with the RMT’s very strong recommendation to their members to not accept the offer to turn it down, to reject it out of hand, we still saw nearly 40% of RMT members wanting to accept it,” said the transport secretary.
“So I think the tide is turning on opinion about whether these offers are reasonable or not, and therefore I hope the union will look at it again, call off the strikes and accept what is a reasonable pay offer.”
But Mr Lynch said the offer included too many of the union’s “red lines”, including taking guards off trains and closing ticket offices.
“I can see a way through where we can get some improvements in the proposals,” he told Sky News. “We can come to terms with what they are calling their ‘modernisation agenda’.
“[But] if you’re looking for a compromise, you don’t put things into a package that you know your counterpart can never accept as a red line and as a principle.
“We don’t do that to the employers. We don’t demand things that they can never give us. We only request the things that are capable of being delivered.
“So it’s the imposition of the government that has caused a non-development of a deal and a non-development of a set of proposals that we can all work with.”
‘Campaign of disruption’
Mr Harper appeared to reject accusations that he had added in caveats to the deal on terms and conditions, meaning members would have to accept having no staff on driverless trains – something the RMT is strongly against.
“I don’t want these strikes to take place at all,” he added. “They’re bad for passengers. They’re bad for businesses.”
However, Mr Lynch stuck by his allegation, calling it a “campaign of disruption” by senior ministers.
“The government intervened with a set of proposals that they know cannot be acceptable because they want these strikes to go ahead,” he added.
“They are making enemies of working people. They make enemies of trade unions and they’re making enemies of the public.
Labour’s Andrew Gwynne told Sky News it was “incumbent on the transport secretary to sit down and negotiate a deal”, and accused him of refusing to do just that.
“Ultimately the public will now be worried about whether their Christmas arrangements are in turmoil,” he added.
“The government’s really got to get a grip of this and that starts by sitting down, negotiating, meeting and coming up with some kind of compromise that both sides can live with.”
Mr Gwynne also accused ministers of “letting” the nurses strikes go ahead later this month by refusing to negotiate over pay.
Health secretary Steve Barclay met the general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, Pat Cullen, last night, with the RCN hoping he would move on a pay offer to avert the two days of industrial action on the cards.
But speaking to Sky News afterwards, Ms Cullen revealed he “was true to its word” and “would not talk to me about pay”, accusing him of “belligerence”.
“So we’ve accepted all of their recommendations in full. The 19% pay rise that the nurses are asking for isn’t affordable. I don’t think it’s reasonable. And it would take money away from frontline health.”
But Labour’s Mr Gwynne said: “We’re not saying that we can afford what the unions are asking for, but a negotiation is just that. You sit down, you listen to the issues, you listen to the concerns on both sides. You come up with common areas to agree and ultimately come out with a deal.
“The government’s not doing that. We would do that. We would sit down with the employers’ representatives and we would ensure that we averted these strikes.
“We didn’t have a single strike on the NHS under the last Labour government. There’s no reason why there should be one under this Conservative government.”
‘Where were you in 22?’
The RMT’s Mr Lynch had his own advice for Labour when it came to striking workers, however, after the party’s leader Sir Keir Starmer banned frontbenchers from joining them on the picket lines.
“There will be a lot of working class people who are asking when the election comes, where were you in 22? What were you doing to support working class people in their struggles?
“If they want our votes in an election, they might want to come and stand next to us when we’re struggling with austerity, when we’re struggling with low pay and people who are in work are having to use foodbanks and living in housing and substandard conditions because of what this government is doing to us.
“If [Sir Keir] wants to be a leader of the working class, he’s got to show he identifies with the working class.”
Source: Skynews.com