TIG Post

Tag: Chief Justice

  • CJ’s removal: Upholding judicial respect requires in-camera hearing – Dr Khalid

    CJ’s removal: Upholding judicial respect requires in-camera hearing – Dr Khalid

    Professor Sharif Mahmud Khalid, Economic Adviser to the Vice President, has explained the relevance of holding in-camera proceedings regarding Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo’s suspension.

    Speaking to JoyNews on Saturday, May 24, he noted that such a move will safeguard the dignity of the Chief Justice’s office.

    According to him, conducting a closed-door engagement will prevent unnecessary public spectacle and protect the integrity of the judicial system.

    “While transparency is important in any democracy, certain constitutional processes require confidentiality to ensure fairness and preserve institutional integrity,” Prof. Khalid noted, urging Ghanaians to trust the legal process.

    A series of petitions have been filed against Chief Justice Torkornoo, beginning with one from a group known as Shining Stars of Ghana.

    The group alleges she violated Article 144 of the Constitution by personally recommending judges for promotion to the Supreme Court, and further claims she ruled on a case involving the Speaker of Parliament without granting him a hearing, despite his refusal to respond to the suit.

    Another petition from a police officer who is also a lawyer accuses the Chief Justice of manipulating evidence and abusing her authority, following an incident during a Supreme Court session where he was reportedly reprimanded, arrested, and detained. However, court records suggest the lawyer’s conduct during proceedings prompted a unanimous caution from the bench, not just the Chief Justice.

    A third petition, submitted by a private individual, lists 21 alleged misconducts and four claims of incompetence. Among the accusations is the misuse of public funds—specifically, that she spent over GH¢261,000 and $30,000 on a family trip abroad in 2023 and misused an additional GH¢75,580 and $14,000 during another foreign assignment without proper accountability.

    Subsequent reports indicate two more petitions have been added to the list, intensifying pressure on the judiciary.

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, in her written response to President Mahama, strongly denied allegations of misconduct and abuse of office brought against her by senior police officer describing them as baseless and lacking grounds for her removal from office.

    A five-member committee has been formed to investigate the matter. The committee is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang, and includes Justice Samuel Kwame Adibu-Asiedu, former Auditor-General Daniel Yaw Domelevo, Major Flora Bazwaanura Dalugo of the Ghana Armed Forces, and Associate Professor James Sefah Dzisah of the University of Ghana.

    Legal matters arising

    Member of Parliament for Old Tafo, Ekow Vincent Assafuah, has moved to challenge the suspension of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, filing an application at the Supreme Court to injunct the presidential decision.

    The notice of motion, dated April 24, is a direct response to President John Dramani Mahama’s April 22 suspension of the Chief Justice, which was carried out in line with Article 146(6) of the 1992 Constitution after consultations with the Council of State and a determination that a prima facie case existed.

    According to Mr Assafuah, the process that led to the Chief Justice’s suspension violated constitutional provisions, as she was not informed of the petitions nor given an opportunity to respond before the President engaged the Council of State.

    He further described the actions taken thus far, including the formation of an investigative committee, as “a farce and the product of a pre-conceived orchestration to unconstitutionally remove the Chief Justice from office.”

    Ekow Vincent Assafuah filed an injunction application to halt the process for the removal of the Chief Justice; however, this application was also dismissed by the Supreme Court on May 6.

    The second interlocutory injunction application challenging the process for the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo from office has been thrown out by the apex court.The Supreme Court, by a 4 to 1 majority decision, deemed the application by a private citizen, Theodore Kofi Atta-Quartey, unmeritorious on Wednesday, May 21.

    The five-member panel comprised Justices Paul Baffoe-Bonnie (Presiding), Issifu Omoro Tanko Amadu, Yonny Kulendi, Henry Anthony Kwofie, and Yaw Asare Darko. Justice Yaw Asare Darko was the only one who disagreed with the majority’s opinion.

    Justice Torkornoo heads to court

    Suspended Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has headed to the Supreme Court to prevent the committee set up by President John Mahama to probe the petitions seeking her removal from office.

    She is also requesting the apex court to halt her suspension issued by the President under Article 146(10) of the Constitution until a final determination is made on the matter.

    On Wednesday, May 21, her legal team at Dame and Partners filed an interlocutory injunction application.

    The defendants per the writ, are Attorney-General Dr Dominic Ayine, Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang, Justice Samuel Kwame Adibu-Asiedu, Daniel Yao Domelovo, Major Flora Bazwaanura Dalugo, and Professor James Sefah Dzisah.

    The plaintiff has prayed the apex court to restrain the committee from proceeding with any further inquiry as well as prevent Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang, the acting Chief Justice, from participating in the process.

    Experts react to Torkornoo’s suit

    A former Director of the Ghana School of Law, Kwaku Ansa-Asare, believes that Justice Torkornoo should have first sought counsel from the Judicial Council before heading to the apex court.

    “The Judicial Council has been established to aid successive Chief Justices to behave themselves. So if an incumbent Chief Justice has a problem, her first port of call should be to seek counsel. I don’t think that has been done,” he said.

    Director of Legal Affairs for the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Godwin Edudzi Tameklo, described the suspended Chief Justice’s move as interesting.

    “I’m happy that the suspended Chief Justice is going to have the benefit of how the justice system works. Just like any one of us, her leadership may need the benefits of the very justice she, together with others, over the years, delivered to people,” he said while engagaing the media in an interview.

  • Afenyo-Markin engages Police over alleged assault during CJ demo

    Afenyo-Markin engages Police over alleged assault during CJ demo

    Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has met with the Ghana Police Service to support investigations into a reported confrontation involving a police officer during the “Save the Judiciary” demonstration on Monday, May 5.

    The Ghana Police Service confirmed that the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) has opened an inquiry into allegations that the Effutu MP assaulted a uniformed officer at the entrance to Parliament House.

    This development follows a formal request submitted by the CID to the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, who subsequently instructed Mr Afenyo-Markin to cooperate with law enforcement officials.

    In compliance with the Speaker’s directive, the Minority Leader appeared before the Police on Wednesday, May 7, to provide his version of the events.

    The case has since expanded, as the Police disclosed that a second investigation is underway based on a counter-complaint filed by Mr Afenyo-Markin himself. According to the MP, he was not the aggressor but rather the victim of assault by the same officer involved.

    Detailing the incident, Mr Afenyo-Markin stated that while leading protestors to Parliament to submit a petition calling for stronger judicial independence, he was unexpectedly attacked by an officer identified as Constable Forson.

    “The blow left me momentarily dazed and struggling to breathe,” he recounted.

    He added that he was quickly assisted by parliamentary security personnel and demonstrators nearby, and taken to a rest area before continuing with the petition presentation.

  • Respect the right of Chief Justice to hearing – Assafuah to Supreme Court

    Respect the right of Chief Justice to hearing – Assafuah to Supreme Court

    The plaintiff in the case filed against the processes triggered by the President for the removal of the Chief Justice, Hon. Vincent Ekow Assafuah, Member of Parliament for the Old Tafo Constituency in the Ashanti Region, has filed a statement of case in support of the writ issued by him on 27th March.

    In a comprehensive 42-page submission filed on his behalf on 9th April, by his counsel, former Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Godfred Yeboah Dame, the plaintiff argues for the Supreme Court to declare as null, void, and of no effect all steps taken by the President in consultation with the Council of State for the removal of the Chief Justice, Gertrude Araba Esaba Torkornoo.

    Mr. Dame refers to the constitutional history of Ghana from 1957 on provisions to protect the judiciary from what he describes as “undue interference with the independence of the judiciary and protection of the security of tenure of judges” and also examines the legal regime and practice of various jurisdictions from around the world. He concludes that the Supreme Court ought to exercise its powers of “judicial review under articles 2(1) and 130(1) to nullify all steps taken purportedly to remove the Chief Justice from office as prayed for in the writ of summons”.

    The plaintiff submits in his statement of case that the right to be notified of charge(s) levelled against one and to be heard on same is a fundamental and inalienable right enshrined in the Constitution, 1992.

    That right, according to plaintiff, “assumes greater significance in the context of quasi-judicial proceedings. The process of determining the existence or otherwise of a prima facie case in a petition for the removal of the Chief Justice is a quasi-judicial one performed by the President in consultation with the Council of State”.

    In the view of the plaintiff, following the presentation of a petition to the President for the removal of the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice is entitled to receive a copy of the petition and to be notified about the contents thereof.

    “The Chief Justice, upon a true and proper interpretation of the Constitution, is entitled to deliver his or her responses to allegations contained in the petition which will be a basis for consultation between the President and the Council of State on whether a prima facie case is disclosed by the petition”, Mr. Godfred Dame submitted to the Supreme Court.

    Counsel for the plaintiff contends that a notification of the Chief Justice and the grant of an opportunity to deliver a response to allegations contained in a petition are not only procedural rights but substantive due process designed to protect the institution of the judiciary from abuse and undue interference and must therefore be strictly observed.

    Effect of President’s press release and subsequent measures

    Counsel for the plaintiff notes that a purported step to furnish the Chief Justice with a copy of the petition and request his or her answers after the consultation process with the Council of State has begun violates the constitutional requirements of due process anticipated by articles 23 and 296 as stated above. Such a step further shows bad faith and should not be condoned by the Court.

    “Respectfully, there is no justifiable reason for the President to “commence the consultation process mandated by Article 146 of the Constitution”, and announce it to the world before coming back to ask the Chief Justice for her responses. This is unfair and violates due process. It is outstandingly bad, shocking and egregiously unfair for the President to announce a trigger of the removal processes of the Chief Justice under article 146 to the whole world, when he has not even extended the courtesy of informing the Chief Justice about a receipt of the petition(s) in question.

    What could explain the unbridled zeal of the President to trigger Article 146 and commence consultation with the Council of State as announced by his Spokesperson to the world when he had not informed the Chief Justice or given her a copy? What kind of consultation had the President actually commenced with the Council of State? Was it consultation to form a committee, or a consultation to make a prima facie determination? These questions arise from the press release by the President”, Mr. Dame quipped in the statement of case filed on behalf of the plaintiff.

    Having regard to the history of this country for some political administrations in the past to control the Judiciary through removal processes, the Court ought to insist on a strict compliance with the procedural requirements anticipated by the letter and spirit of articles 23, 146 and 296 in the processes for an attempt to remove the Chief Justice, and declare any step taken in violation of the provisions null, void and of no effect”, counsel for plaintiff submitted.

    Constitutional history of Ghana

    Examining the strength of Ghana’s history of protection of judges, as can be seen in the various constitutions the nation has had since independence, Mr. Dame noted that the 1957 and 1960 Constitutions presented the weakest regime for protection of the security of judges.

    On this account, “the President in 1963 dismissed the Chief Justice. This was supported by the votes of two-thirds of the Assembly in a Parliament dominated by one political party – a situation very similar to the circumstances Ghana finds itself in now as a country”, he submitted.

    This experience calls for stronger measures to protect the independence of the Judiciary and the tenure of judges, particularly, the head of the Judiciary, the Chief Justice. 

    Practice in foreign jurisdictions

    Regarding the practice in other jurisdictions, counsel for the plaintiff, Godfred Yeboah Dame noted that “all advanced legal systems stipulate a rigorous and elaborate procedure for the removal of a judge of a superior court. The procedures do not consider such exercises lightly and are calculated at protecting judges from abusive tendencies to compromise the independence of the Judiciary – a necessary organ for the running of any heathy society.  Even when the legal framework is as scanty and sketchy as Ghana’s, practice has ensured that it is only through an elaborate and rigorous mechanism that the removal of a superior court judge may be effected. It is even more so in the case of the Head of the Judiciary – the Chief Justice”.

    Counsel concluded his submissions by stating that a failure by the President to notify the Chief Justice about allegations contained in a petition filed against him or her before consulting the Council of State on same, results in a violation of a substantive right impinging on an abuse of the Head of the Judiciary, shows complete bad faith and renders the process null, void and of no effect.

    CJ’S_CASE_VRS_ATTORNEY_GENERAL_PLAINTIFF’S_STATEMENT_OF_CASEDownload
  • Case on Chief Justice’s removal adjourned indefinitely

    Case on Chief Justice’s removal adjourned indefinitely

    The hearing of an application seeking to halt the ongoing process for determining a prima facie case regarding petitions for the removal of the Chief Justice has been adjourned indefinitely by the Supreme Court.

    The adjournment followed the absence of the Attorney General, who had secured prior permission from the Chief Justice. The Attorney General had requested that all cases involving his office be postponed from April 7 to April 10, citing a mandatory training workshop for lawyers at the Attorney General’s Department.

    In court, two state attorneys — including a former Personal Assistant to Godfred Dame during his tenure as Attorney General — appeared and formally requested an adjournment as a courtesy to the court.

    However, Godfred Yeboah Dame, representing Vincent Ekow Asafuah, the plaintiff in the matter, expressed surprise at the absence of Attorney General Dr. Dominic Ayine and his deputy, Dr. Justice Srem-Sai, especially considering the significance of the case.

    Dame subsequently requested the court to adjourn the hearing to Monday, April 14.

    The plaintiff is seeking a Supreme Court declaration that the President’s decision to proceed with the establishment of a prima facie case against the Chief Justice is unconstitutional.

    Meanwhile, Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has presented her initial response to President John Mahama regarding petitions that call for her removal from office over alleged misconduct.

    Her submission comes just as the 10-day period granted for her to reply to the petitions ended on Monday, April 7.

  • Chief Justice submits response to Mahama over petitions seeking her removal

    Chief Justice submits response to Mahama over petitions seeking her removal

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has presented her initial response to President John Mahama regarding petitions that call for her removal from office.

    Her submission comes just as the 10-day period granted for her to reply to the petitions ends today, Monday, April 7.

    These petitions, which were sent to the President in early March, have drawn widespread public interest and stirred legal and constitutional discussions about the correct process for handling such cases.

    Last week, Justice Torkornoo wrote to the President requesting copies of the petitions and asked for an additional seven days to respond, citing the need for due process and fairness.

    Her response has now been officially submitted to both the President and the Council of State and will be reviewed as part of the consultation process outlined under Article 146(6) of the 1992 Constitution.

    This marks a significant step that may lead to the establishment of a committee to investigate the allegations made against her.

    Meanwhile, the Supreme Court will, on April 9, hear a case brought by Old Tafo MP Vincent Ekow Assafuah. The suit challenges the President’s authority to initiate removal proceedings without first informing the Chief Justice, raising questions about the legality of the process.

    This legal challenge adds further complexity, as it questions whether proper notification procedures were followed in the case against Justice Torkornoo.

    The removal of a Chief Justice is guided by Article 146 of the Constitution, which allows for such action only in cases of stated misconduct, incompetence, or an inability to carry out official duties due to physical or mental incapacity.

    Key Provisions of Article 146 Regarding Removal:

    Article 146(1): A Justice of the Superior Court or a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal can only be removed from office for misbehaviour, incompetence, or inability to perform their duties due to infirmity.

    Article 146(2): The removal process must follow the specific procedures outlined in the article.

    Article 146(3): If the President receives a petition for the removal of a Justice, other than the Chief Justice, the petition is referred to the Chief Justice for a determination of whether there is a prima facie case.

    Article 146(4): If the Chief Justice finds a prima facie case, a committee is formed to investigate the complaint. This committee consists of three Justices or Chairpersons of Regional Tribunals and two other individuals, not members of the Council of State or Parliament.

    Article 146(5): The committee investigates the complaint and submits its recommendations to the Chief Justice, who forwards them to the President.

    Article 146(6): For the removal of the Chief Justice, the President, in consultation with the Council of State, forms a committee of two Supreme Court Justices and three non-lawyers to investigate and recommend whether the Chief Justice should be removed.

    Article 146(7): The committee will inquire into the petition and make its recommendation to the President.

    Article 146(8): All proceedings under this article must be conducted in camera, and the person against whom the petition is made is entitled to be heard in their defence.

    Article 146(9): The President must act in accordance with the recommendations of the committee.

    Article 146(10): The President may suspend the Chief Justice or any other Justice during the process, following advice from the Council of State or the Judicial Council.

    The outcome of the consultation with the Council of State, the Supreme Court’s hearing of the suit, and the actions taken by the President will determine the next steps in this unfolding situation.

    As the process moves forward, the nation remains attentive to how the constitutional provisions will be applied and what consequences may arise from the ongoing petitions.

  • Mahama disappointed CJ’s request letter circulated on social media before he could review its contents

    Mahama disappointed CJ’s request letter circulated on social media before he could review its contents

    President John Dramani Mahama has expressed disappointment over the circulation of a letter from Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo on social media before he had the chance to review its contents.

    The Chief Justice had formally written to the President requesting copies of the petitions submitted for her removal from office. In her letter, dated March 27, 2025, she asked for at least seven days to respond before any Committee of Inquiry was constituted to probe the matter.

    “I am by this letter humbly and respectfully asking His Excellency the President and eminent members of the Council of State to forward the petition against me to me, and allow me at least seven days after receipt of same, to provide my response to you, which response can then form part of the material that you conduct the consultations anticipated under 146(6) before the possible setting up of a Committee of Inquiry under Article 146(7),” Justice Torkornoo stated.

    Her request followed President Mahama’s decision to forward three petitions calling for her removal to the Council of State for further action. However, the Chief Justice later noted that she had yet to receive copies of the petitions despite their submission to the Council of State two days prior.

    Responding to the Chief Justice’s concerns, the Executive Secretary to the President, Calistus Mahama, outlined the sequence of events leading up to the transmission of the petitions.

    “His Excellency has received three petitions from three individuals requesting your removal as Chief Justice. Two are dated 14th February 2025, and the third is dated 17th March 2025. Copies of the three petitions are attached,” he wrote.

    He further detailed that on March 24, 2025, the President forwarded the petitions to the Chairman of the Council of State, notifying them of his intention to send the documents to the Chief Justice for preliminary comments or a response.

    “On 27th March 2025, His Excellency received responses from the Chairman of the Council of State consenting to this request. Copies of these letters are also attached,” the Executive Secretary added.

    However, the President’s concern was primarily focused on the premature circulation of the Chief Justice’s letter in the public domain.

    “His Excellency, however, notes with disappointment that your letter of 27th March 2025 addressed to him was circulating on social media even before he could review its contents. The letter was reportedly shared as an attachment to another letter you wrote to the President of the Supreme Court, the President of the Association of Magistrates and Judges, and the President of the Ghana Bar Association,” Calistus Mahama stated in his response.

    Citing legal precedent, the Executive Secretary further noted that confidentiality was essential to proceedings under Article 146.

    “Upon receipt of the petitions, His Excellency was advised that per Frank Agyei Twum v Attorney General and Bright Akwetey [2005-2006] SCGLR 732, the confidentiality attached to proceedings under Article 146 also extends to documents and other relevant material employed in the proceedings.”

    President Mahama has assured the Chief Justice of due process in handling the petitions and is expected to proceed with consultations before any further action is taken.

  • You have 10 days to respond to removal petitions – Mahama to Chief Justice

    You have 10 days to respond to removal petitions – Mahama to Chief Justice

    President John Dramani Mahama has instructed Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo ten days to issue an initial reply to three petitions calling for her dismissal.

    This follows Chief Justice Torkonoo’s formal request to the president for copies of the petitions filed against her.

    “In light of this, you are kindly required to submit your preliminary response within ten (10) days of receiving this letter to facilitate further consultations between His Excellency and the Council of State.”

    In a letter to the Chief Justice, President Mahama expressed concern over the premature circulation of her request on social media before he had a chance to review it.

    “His Excellency, however, notes with disappointment that your letter of 27th March 2025 addressed to him was circulating on social media even before he could review its contents. The letter was reportedly shared as an attachment to another letter you wrote to the President of the Supreme Court, the President of the Association of Magistrates and Judges and the President of the Ghana Bar Association (GBA).”

    The petitions have sparked intense debate within legal and political circles, questioning the Chief Justice’s conduct and suitability to remain in office.

    While the details of the allegations remain undisclosed, the case is emerging as a significant legal and constitutional challenge.

    With time running out, the Chief Justice must submit her response within the given deadline or face potential consequences that could impact her role.

    Legal experts suggest that her reply will play a crucial role in determining whether a formal inquiry into the petitions will be initiated.

  • Chief Justice petitions Mahama for copies of her removal requests

    Chief Justice petitions Mahama for copies of her removal requests

    Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has formally requested copies of the petitions submitted to President John Dramani Mahama that seek her removal from office.

    In a letter addressed to the President on Thursday, March 27, she sought access to the documents to allow her to respond appropriately.

    Her request comes after President Mahama began consultations with the Council of State following the receipt of three petitions calling for her removal.

    The Chief Justice’s appeal coincides with a lawsuit filed at the Supreme Court by Vincent Assafuah, the New Patriotic Party MP for Old Tafo. The suit challenges the process being followed in handling the petitions.

    The plaintiff, represented by former Attorney-General Godfred Dame, argues that the Chief Justice must be notified of the petitions and given an opportunity to respond before the President consults the Council of State.

    Minister for Government Communications, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, confirmed that the petitions have been forwarded to the Council of State in line with Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution.

    Although the exact details of the petitions have not been disclosed, the process marks the initial stage of a constitutional procedure that could have significant implications for Ghana’s judiciary.

    The Council of State is expected to assess the petitions and provide guidance to the President on the appropriate steps to take.

    In her letter, Chief Justice Torkornoo emphasized the importance of being given a fair chance to respond before any further action is taken.

    “I am by this letter humbly and respectfully asking His Excellency the President and eminent members of the Council of State to forward the petitions against me to me, and allow me at least seven days after receipt of same, to provide my response to you, which response can then form part of the material that you conduct the consultations anticipated under 146 (6), before the possible setting up of a Committee of Inquiry under Article 146 (7),” she stated.

  • Chief Justice asks Mahama for copies of petitions calling for her removal

    Chief Justice asks Mahama for copies of petitions calling for her removal

    Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has formally requested copies of petitions submitted to President John Dramani Mahama, which seek her removal from office.

    In a letter dated Thursday, March 27, she appealed to the President for access to these documents, stating that she needs them to provide an informed response.

    Her request follows President Mahama’s decision to consult the Council of State after receiving three petitions calling for her removal.

    At the same time, Vincent Assafuah, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) Member of Parliament for Old Tafo, has taken legal action at the Supreme Court, challenging the process being used to handle the petitions.

    Represented by former Attorney-General Godfred Dame, Assafuah argues that the Chief Justice must be given an opportunity to respond to the allegations before the President initiates consultations with the Council of State.

    request for petitionsDownload

    Minister for Government Communications, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, has confirmed that three petitions regarding the potential removal of the Chief Justice have been submitted to the Council of State, in accordance with Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution.

    Although the specific allegations remain undisclosed, this marks the initial phase of a constitutional process that could have far-reaching implications for Ghana’s judiciary. The Council of State is now tasked with reviewing the petitions and advising the President on the appropriate course of action.

    Meanwhile, Chief Justice Torkornoo has formally written to the President, requesting a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations before any further steps are taken.

    “I am by this letter humbly and respectfully asking His Excellency the President and eminent members of the Council of State to forward the petitions against me to me, and allow me at least seven days after receipt of same, to provide my response to you, which response can then form part of the material that you conduct the consultations anticipated under 146 (6), before the possible setting up of a Committee of Inquiry under Article 146 (7),” she stated.

  • A-G dragged to court by Dame over Chief Justice removal process

    A-G dragged to court by Dame over Chief Justice removal process

    Old Tafo Member of Parliament Vincent Ekow Assafuah has filed a lawsuit at the Supreme Court, challenging the procedural legitimacy of President John Mahama’s actions regarding the possible removal of the Chief Justice.

    The suit, filed through his legal counsel, former Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame, argues that the President’s approach violates constitutional provisions meant to safeguard judicial independence.

    Invoking the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction under Article 2(1)(b) of the 1992 Constitution, Assafuah is seeking a series of declarations clarifying the proper procedure for initiating the removal of a Chief Justice. Central to his argument is the claim that the President is required to inform the Chief Justice and solicit their comments before engaging the Council of State on any removal petition.

    His suit contends that the failure to notify the Chief Justice before beginning consultations with the Council of State constitutes a constitutional breach. It further asserts that such an omission undermines the judiciary’s security of tenure and independence, as enshrined in Articles 127(1) and (2) of the Constitution. Additionally, the lawsuit claims that bypassing the Chief Justice in the process denies them the right to a fair hearing, rendering any resulting decisions procedurally flawed.

    Assafuah is asking the court to declare that any attempt to remove the Chief Justice without following due process is unconstitutional and void. He is also requesting any additional reliefs the Supreme Court may deem appropriate.

    The case is expected to be heard in the coming weeks, with the Attorney-General required to respond within fourteen days of being served.

  • Petitions against Chief Justice: Mahama seeks Council of State’s advice

    Petitions against Chief Justice: Mahama seeks Council of State’s advice

    President John Mahama has initiated consultations with the Council of State following the submission of three petitions calling for the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo.

    Minister for Government Communications, Felix Kwakye Ofosu, confirmed in a statement that the petitions have been referred to the Council of State in accordance with Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution.

    Although the specifics of the petitions remain undisclosed, this move marks the commencement of a constitutional process that could bring significant shifts within Ghana’s judiciary.

    The Council of State is now tasked with reviewing the petitions and advising the President on the appropriate course of action as outlined in the constitution.

    In a related development earlier this year, former President Nana Akufo-Addo rejected a petition seeking to remove Chief Justice Torkornoo. After consultations with the Council of State, he determined that the petition, submitted by Prof. Stephen Kwaku Asare, lacked merit and did not establish a prima facie case for further investigation.

    The petition alleged misconduct and incompetence on the part of Chief Justice Torkornoo, citing issues such as panel reconstitution, issuance of practice directions, and constitutional violations. However, after review, the petition was dismissed due to insufficient evidence.

    The procedure for the removal of the Chief Justice is governed by Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution. According to the constitutional provisions:

    Article 146 – Removal Of Justices Of Superior Courts And Chairmen Of Regional Tribunals

    1) A Justice of the Superior Court or a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal shall not be removed from office except for stated misbehaviour or incompetence or on ground of inability to perform the functions of his office arising from infirmity of Body or mind.

    (2) A Justice of the Superior Court of Judicature or a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal may only be removed in accordance with the procedure specified in this article.

    (3) If the President receives a petition for the removal of a Justice of a Superior Court other than the Chief Justice or for the removal of the Chairman of a Regional Tribunal, he shall refer the petition to the Chief Justice, who shall determine whether there is a prima facie case.

    (4) Where the Chief Justice decides that there is a prima facie case, he shall set up a committee consisting of three Justices of the Superior Courts or Chairmen of the Regional Tribunals or both, appointed by the Judicial Council and two other persons who are not members of the Council of State, nor members of Parliament, nor lawyers, and who shall be appointed by the Chief Justice on the advice of the Council of State.

    (5) The committee appointed under clause (4) of this article shall investigate the complaint and shall make its recommendations to the Chief Justice who shall forward them to the President.

    (6) Where the petition is for the removal of the Chief Justice, the President shall, acting in consultation with the Council of State, appoint a committee consisting of two Justices of the Supreme Court, one of whom shall be appointed chairman by the President, and three other persons who are not members of the Council of State, nor members of Parliament, nor lawyers.

    (7) The committee appointed under clause (6) of this article shall inquire into the petition and recommend to the President whether the Chief Justice ought to be removed from office.

    (8) All proceedings under this article shall be held in camera, and the Justice or Chairman against whom the petition is made is entitled to be heard in his defence by himself or by a lawyer or other expert of his choice.

    (9) The President shall, in each case, act in accordance with the recommendations of the committee.

    (10) Where a petition has been referred to a committee under this article, the President may-

    (a) in the case of the Chief Justice, acting in accordance with the advice of the Council of State, by warrant signed by him, suspend the Chief Justice;

    (b) in the case of any other Justice of a Superior Court or of a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal, acting in accordance with the advice of the Judicial Council, suspend that Justice or that Chairman of a Regional Tribunal.

    (11) The President may, at any time, revoke a suspension under this article.

  • A-G nominates Xavier Sosu, 2 others to General Legal Council

    A-G nominates Xavier Sosu, 2 others to General Legal Council

    Attorney-General (AG) and Minister of Justice, Dr. Dominic Ayine, has nominated three individuals to serve on the General Legal Council in accordance with Section 1(2) of the Legal Profession Act, 1960, and Paragraph 2(1)(d) of the First Schedule to the Act.

    A statement from the Office of the Attorney-General and Ministry of Justice announced the selection of Francis-Xavier Sosu, Member of Parliament for Madina; Clara Beeri Kasser-Tee, a lecturer at the University of Ghana School of Law; and Dr. Abdul-Bassit Aziz Bamba, a senior lecturer at the same institution.

    These nominees have been chosen to bring their legal expertise to the Council, which is responsible for regulating legal education and upholding professional standards within the legal profession.

    The statement also confirmed that President John Dramani Mahama has been officially informed of the nominations. Additionally, the Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkornoo, was assured of the Attorney-General’s full commitment to the process.

    About nominees

    Clara Beeri Kasser-Tee is a distinguished lawyer and law lecturer at the University of Ghana School of Law. She is the founder and head of Kasser Law Firm and has made significant contributions to legal education, political and institutional development in Ghana. Clara is known for her expertise in Oil and Gas Law, Environmental Law, and Taxation, and has developed innovative concepts to improve tax collection in Ghana. She is also a respected public figure, often engaging with the media and the Ghana Revenue Authority on national issues.

    Francis-Xavier Sosu is a human rights lawyer and politician, currently serving as the Member of Parliament for the Madina Constituency. He is a member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and has a strong background in sociology, law, and economic policy management. Sosu is known for his advocacy for human rights and legal reforms, including his successful efforts to abolish capital punishment in Ghana. His journey from a challenging childhood to becoming a prominent lawyer and politician is a testament to his resilience and dedication to justice.

    Dr. Abdul-Bassit Aziz Bamba is a senior lecturer at the University of Ghana School of Law, where he teaches courses on Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, and International Commercial Arbitration. He holds advanced degrees from Harvard Law School and has extensive experience in legal practice and consulting. Dr. Bamba has worked with various international organizations and has published extensively on topics such as criminal law, constitutional law, and human rights. His academic and professional achievements make him a valuable asset to the General Legal Council.

  • Future of governance at risk if politics influences removal of Chief Justice – Prof Adei

    Future of governance at risk if politics influences removal of Chief Justice – Prof Adei

    A former Rector of the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA), Professor Stephen Adei, has expressed his opposition to calls for the removal of the Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkornoo.

    According to him, it will be disastrous if President-elect John Dramani Mahama decides to make such a move.

    He said this in an interview on Accra-based TV3, stating Ghanaians will pay a heavy price if Justice Torkornoo is removed.

    “It would be disastrous if Mr Mahama removes the Chief Justice. Such a move would consolidate a very bad practice that will not augur well for the future of this country. We must resist the temptation to politicise every aspect of governance, especially our judiciary,” he stated.

    Professor Adei added that, the Chief Justice must be allowed to operate devoid of political interference.

    He further emphasised the need for political leaders to prioritise institutional integrity over partisan considerations.

    “The Chief Justice must not work well with Akufo-Addo or Mahama but must be seen in upholding the law and therefore if she is not upholding the law, then you go through the justification and impeachment, everything list. But we cannot use a political motivation and decision to remove a Chief Justice,” he added.

  • Chief Justice to take Justice clubs nationwide next year to promote rule of law

    Chief Justice to take Justice clubs nationwide next year to promote rule of law

    Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has announced plans to expand Justice Clubs across the regions of Ghana in 2025 as part of efforts to promote the rule of law, legality, and justice among young people.

    Speaking at the 2024 Enhanced Chief Justice’s Mentoring Programme in Accra on Wednesday, she highlighted the Judiciary’s commitment to deepening public engagement and making its work accessible through purposeful interactions.

    “Next year, we will be on the road to inaugurate more Justice Clubs in the regions of Ghana,” she said.

    The mentoring programme, themed “I Pledge Myself to the Service of Ghana,” brought together students from six schools with established Justice Clubs—St. Mary’s Senior High School, Accra High School, Presbyterian Boys’ Senior High School, SOS Hermann Gmeiner International College, Chemu Senior High Technical School, and Tema Senior High School. Other participating groups included the Orange Girls (Kayayei) and the United Nations Youth Association.

    Chief Justice Torkornoo emphasized that Justice Clubs are designed to positively influence schools, families, and communities by instilling values of law, legality, and justice, while also boosting the confidence of young people. She encouraged students to participate in clubs and societies, noting that these activities promote ethical values, leadership skills, and resilience.

    “The rationale behind the proposal to introduce Justice Clubs into schools and communities is to deepen understanding of the rule of law, legality, and justice, thereby promoting those fundamental principles throughout the nation,” she said.

    Touching on the theme, the Chief Justice underscored the importance of service to the nation, urging students to embrace their ability to contribute meaningfully to Ghana’s development.

    “We are one nation, one people, and have one destiny. We must build this nation ourselves and enjoy it ourselves. But we can only do so if we all contribute to equipping each other with what we have for the task,” she said.

    Mrs. Efua Ghartey, President of the Ghana Bar Association (GBA), encouraged contributions to building a just, equitable, and prosperous society, describing the legal profession as a calling that extends beyond courtrooms.

    “Lawyers are architects of justice, guides of human rights, and agents of social change… Lawyers have been at the forefront of national progress,” she said.

    Veteran lawyer Sam Okudzeto advised the students to embrace humility and learn from experienced superiors while adopting technology in their legal education. Justice Eric Kyei Baffour, a Court of Appeal Judge, urged students to seek divine guidance, believe in their abilities, and work hard to achieve their aspirations.

    The programme concluded with participants observing court proceedings and engaging with judges and lawyers from both the Superior and Lower Courts, offering them firsthand insights into the workings of the judiciary.

  • Put your house in order – Franklin Cudjoe to Chief Justice after verdict on vacant seat case

    Put your house in order – Franklin Cudjoe to Chief Justice after verdict on vacant seat case

    President of IMANI Africa, Franklin Cudjoe, has urged the Chief Justice, Getrude Torkonoo, to “put her house in order.”

    He made these remarks while expressing his discontent with recent court decisions and voicing sharp criticism of Ghana’s judiciary.

    On his part, “Frankly speaking, my reading of the judiciary, unfortunately, in this particular case and a few of the cases, they have become like a playground for politicians; I think it’s a disappointment. I hope that they will redeem themselves quickly and the Chief Justice should put her house in order, ” he said during an appearance on Channel One TV’s The Big Issue on November 13, 2024.

    His remarks came in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling that overturned Speaker Alban Bagbin’s declaration of four parliamentary seats as vacant.

    Cudjoe accused the judiciary of exhibiting political bias, claiming it is increasingly being used as a tool for political agendas.

    He expressed serious concerns about what he perceives as a lack of impartiality in judicial rulings and called on Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo to uphold the judiciary’s credibility and ensure fairness in future judgements.

    “The real issue has to do with the way we do our politics in this part of our world.

    Frankly speaking, it is not right to have almost 70% of the populace of the country say you are biassed. It is not fair. It’s not pretty at all, and I think I’m part of that 70%. Maybe I’m on top of the 70% right now,” he noted.

    On Tuesday, November 12, the Supreme Court overturned Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin’s decision to declare four parliamentary seats vacant. The ruling came in response to a legal challenge filed by Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin.

    In a detailed judgement delivered on Thursday, November 14, five of the justices sided with the Majority Leader, stating that a parliamentary seat can only be declared vacant if a Member of Parliament (MP) switches political parties while retaining their seat. The Court further clarified that the Speaker’s directive would not take effect during the current parliamentary term.

    However, the ruling was not unanimous. Two justices dissented, arguing that the Supreme Court lacked the authority to adjudicate the matter. Their stance highlighted differing interpretations of the Court’s jurisdiction on such issues.

  • Gertrude Torkornoo unfit for her role as Chief Justice – Martin Amidu

    Gertrude Torkornoo unfit for her role as Chief Justice – Martin Amidu

    Former Special Prosecutor Martin Amidu has criticized Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo over her decision to close courts in the Upper East Region due to security concerns in Bawku and surrounding areas.

    In a statement issued on Sunday, November 10, 2024, Amidu expressed frustration, saying that the Chief Justice’s actions show a lack of understanding of Ghana’s geography and history.

    He stated, “The conduct of the Chief Justice in closing those courts on spurious grounds demonstrated her lack of high moral character and proven integrity to have been entrusted with the exercise of the administrative and supervisory powers vested in her under Article 125 of the 1992 Constitution.”

    Amidu went on to question the Chief Justice’s ability to lead, saying, “A Chief Justice of any country who does not know the history and geography of her country and acts discriminatorily, unfairly, and without candour in the performance of her administrative and supervisory functions is clearly unfit to be the head of the administration of an independent judiciary.”

    He pointed out that the court closures extended to areas far from Bawku, such as Bolgatanga, Zebilla, and Garu, which were not directly affected by the security situation. “Her decision included courts in locations like Bolgatanga, Zebilla, and Garu, which Amidu argued were neither geographically close to Bawku nor relevant to the security advisories.”

    Amidu also questioned why similar closures had not been imposed on other areas facing security concerns, citing curfews in towns across the country. “The website of the Ministry of the Interior, where I was once also the Minister, shows that between the end of September 2024 and the end of October 2024, the Minister for the Interior imposed curfews on ten towns and their environs,” he said. “I am not aware that the Chief Justice closed down the courts in those townships and their environs as a result of the curfew declarations.”

    The former Special Prosecutor criticized the Chief Justice’s response to public backlash, noting her order to reopen four courts without any explanation. He suggested that her actions were politically motivated, driven by loyalty to the executive branch rather than upholding the judiciary’s independence. “The cumulative effect of the perceptions she has created… might have been one of the reasons that contributed to the significant decline in the rating of the standing of the nation’s judiciary,” he added, referring to a report by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation.

    Amidu called for reforms to restore public confidence in the judiciary and proposed changes to limit the Chief Justice’s administrative powers. “The only proposal which in my considered view would salvage the wanton abuse of the administrative and supervisory powers vested in the Chief Justice under the 1992 Constitution is to curb those powers by a constitutional amendment,” he said. He suggested that Artificial Intelligence (AI) could be used to assist in appointing judges, assessing their performance, and making administrative decisions to prevent bias.

    Read the full statement below:

    CHIEF JUSTICE – THE RE-OPENING OF SOME COURTS IN THE UER (1)Download
  • There is no constitutional crisis – Speaker refutes CJ’s claims

    There is no constitutional crisis – Speaker refutes CJ’s claims

    Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin has stated that there is no constitutional crisis in the country as alleged by the Judicial arm of government.

    He made this known during a media briefing today in preparation for Parliament’s upcoming session on Thursday, November 7.

    “I want to start this presser by disabusing and setting the minds of Ghanaians at ease. There is no constitutional crisis in this country,” he said.

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo last week described the parliamentary dispute concerning four seats declared vacant by the Speaker as a constitutional crisis that necessitates urgent resolution.

    During court proceedings on Wednesday, October 30 she expressed concern about what she views as a delay in the judicial process related to this issue, urging the Speaker’s lawyer, Thaddeus Sory, to take prompt action.

    She questioned Sory on why he had not submitted the necessary documents for Speaker Alban Bagbin by the stipulated deadline of October 30, 2024.

    “This is a constitutional crisis; we’re living in a country where Parliament is not sitting. What is going on?” she quizzed.

    Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has dismissed an application by Alban Bagbin, who sought to overturn a ruling that suspended his declaration concerning four parliamentarians.

    This followed an initial suit filed by Effutu MP Alexander Afenyo-Markin, challenging the Speaker’s declaration. Bagbin’s legal team argued that the apex court lacked jurisdiction in the matter, among other arguments. However, after hearing from all parties, including the Attorney General, the Supreme Court upheld its earlier ruling, deeming the Speaker’s appeal to be without merit.

  • GBA’s ‘blind loyalty’ to Chief Justice threatens democracy – Martin Amidu

    GBA’s ‘blind loyalty’ to Chief Justice threatens democracy – Martin Amidu

    Former Attorney General Martin Amidu has strongly criticized the Ghana Bar Association (GBA) for its unreserved endorsement of the Chief Justice’s, Getrude Torkonoo’s, decision to close courts in Bolgatanga.

    In a recent article, Mr Amidu described the GBA’s support as “dangerous for our Constitution, democracy, and the rule of law,” cautioning that unwavering loyalty to administrative decisions could erode judicial independence.

    Mr Amidu questioned the Chief Justice’s motivations, suggesting that such decisions should be grounded in independent judgment rather than influenced by the National Security Council.

    He highlighted the need for transparency, especially as elections approach, urging that administrative actions affecting court access should be scrutinized.

    Mr Amidu also raised concerns over the unprecedented nature of the closures in Bolgatanga and surrounding areas, criticizing it as detrimental to citizens’ rights.

    He argued that the Chief Justice’s rationale for the closures citing regional security concerns—was misguided, noting that Bolgatanga has not been directly impacted by the Bawku conflict.

    Martin Amidu

    He further emphasized the potential legal risks posed by the court suspensions, especially with elections imminent, arguing it limits citizens’ access to justice and could delay the judicial review of election-related cases. Amidu called for parliamentary oversight on the closures, underscoring that such decisions should involve input from local legal stakeholders to protect public access to the justice system.

    “We the People demand Parliamentary oversight of the administrative decision…to close the High Court in Bolgatanga and its environs,” he stated.

  • 7 courts shut down by Chief Justice due to Bawku murders

    7 courts shut down by Chief Justice due to Bawku murders

    Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has directed the closure of seven courts in Bawku and its neighbouring areas amid recent unrest in the region.

    The directive affects the High Court and Circuit Court in Bolgatanga, as well as District Courts in Bolgatanga, Zuarungu, Zebilla, Garu, and Bongo.

    This measure comes as tensions rise due to the presence of Seidu Abagre, who was installed as Bawku Naba in February 2023, though his title lacks official legal recognition. His installation has sparked heightened hostilities among rival groups, leading to multiple clashes and resulting in the loss of 16 lives.

    A statement from the Judicial Secretary on October 29 emphasizes that the closures are intended to protect the well-being of judges, staff, lawyers, and court users. Court registrars have been instructed to secure court assets, while staff are urged to take necessary precautions for their safety until operations can resume.

    Bawku is currently under heavy security due to increased tensions as many residents do not feel safe and are staying indoors, according to reports by local media.

    This latest resurgence of conflict follows the return of Alhaji Seidu, an exiled rival chief, whose presence in Bawku has revived tensions. The violence has already claimed eight lives and has added to the hundreds of casualties and extensive property destruction witnessed over the years.

    In a bid to prevent further escalation, authorities have imposed a curfew on the area, underscoring the urgent need for a peaceful settlement. 

  • Galamsey cases in court must be resolved in a month – A-G tells Chief Justice

    Galamsey cases in court must be resolved in a month – A-G tells Chief Justice

    Ghana’s Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Godfred Yeboah Dame, has urged Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo to direct judges overseeing illegal mining, commonly known as ‘galamsey,’ cases to deliver their rulings within a month of the cases being brought to court.

    Mr. Dame believes that such a directive would play a crucial role in addressing the ongoing environmental degradation caused by unregulated miners and unauthorized companies operating in Ghana’s forest reserves and water bodies.

    Addressing the Annual Conference of the Association of Magistrates and Judges of Ghana, held at the La Beach Hotel on Wednesday, October 2, the Attorney-General expressed his concerns about the slow pace of prosecuting galamsey cases. He warned that these delays were worsening the destruction of the country’s natural resources.

    “One category of cases whose speed of resolution by our courts, I often lament is the trial of illegal mining cases,” he stated. “It is beyond argument that the form of illegal mining known as ‘galamsey’ continues to wreak incalculable damage to our forest reserves and river bodies. A major setback to the struggle against galamsey is the rate of adjudication and punishment of offenders.”

    In a direct appeal to the Chief Justice, Mr. Dame said: “Your ladyship, I therefore respectfully call on you to direct all judges sitting on galamsey cases to conclude the cases, the hearing of which has started, within one month from the commencement of the legal year on 10th October 2024.”

    The Attorney-General also called on politicians to refrain from encouraging illegal mining through their public statements and actions. He condemned any calls for leniency or amnesty for those engaged in galamsey, stressing that such individuals should face the full force of the law.

    “Politicians must also desist from encouraging galamsey through their rhetoric and actions,” Mr. Dame remarked. “Those who preach amnesty for galamsey offenders must be rejected. There should be no place for the grant of amnesty for such crimes in our body politic as the lives of citizens and the future of our nation are at risk.”

    The Attorney-General’s remarks come amid growing public pressure on the government to hold accountable Municipal and District Chief Executives under whose watch illegal mining activities continue. One of the prominent voices calling for such action is Kenneth Ashigbey, Convener of the Media Coalition against Galamsey.

    Illegal mining remains a significant challenge in Ghana, with disastrous effects on water bodies and the environment. Despite various government interventions, including the deployment of security forces to combat the menace, galamsey persists.

    In response to the worsening situation, President Akufo-Addo recently established a five-member ad hoc ministerial committee to engage stakeholders and reassess the government’s efforts to tackle illegal mining.

    Amid the reassessment, calls for more drastic measures, including a nationwide ban on small-scale mining and the declaration of a state of emergency, have gained traction. However, government officials have pushed back on these demands, citing the economic contributions of small-scale gold mining to the country’s economy.

  • Expedite action on salary reviews – JUSAG to CJ

    Expedite action on salary reviews – JUSAG to CJ

    The Judicial Service Staff Association of Ghana (JUSAG) has urged the Chief Justice and the Judicial Council to expedite the review of their salary and allowance proposals.

    JUSAG is advocating for these adjustments to be included in the November 2024 budget, aiming for implementation by January 2025.

    The association stressed the importance of avoiding a repeat of the indefinite strike from the 2022/2023 legal year due to unsatisfactory service conditions.

    Samuel Afotey Otu, JUSAG’s National President, highlighted during the 2024 Annual Judicial Service Outreach and Staff Durbar in Kumasi the need for timely action on their proposal.

    “My Lady, this year, JUSAG has tabled a proposal for review of salaries and related allowances to be implemented in January 2025.

    “I am aware of the speed with which the Judicial Council, which you chair, referred the matter to a committee for consideration,” Mr Otu stated.

    “This is a demonstration of your determination not to repeat the mistakes of the past.

    “My Lady, having toured the country, we could see visibly frustrated faces of staff who are anxious and despondent about the implication of the December general elections on the salaries review,” he pointed out.

    “The budget will be read in November 2024.

    “Best fiscal practice requires that approvals for reviews of salaries are completed on time, to be incorporated into the budget for consideration by Parliament in November 2024 for implementation in January 2025,” he stated.

    Otu acknowledged the prompt action by the Judicial Council, which has already referred the proposal to a committee.

    He emphasized the importance of integrating these changes into the upcoming budget to ensure smooth implementation without delays that could lead to industrial actions, particularly given the election year’s sensitivities.

    The President of JUSAG also praised Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo and the council for their efforts in finalizing the Judicial Service Regulation (CI), which will guide their operations.
    “You have made it your priority, and we trust that the process will be completed and your name will be written in gold ink on the hearts of the employees of the Judicial Service of Ghana and JUSAG as a whole,” Mr Otu stated.

    Otu expressed confidence that this will positively impact JUSAG members and secure their respect.

    Additionally, Otu called for a revision of the staff durbar’s structure.

    He suggested that the current format, where staff first discuss issues among themselves before hearing from the Chief Justice, might not effectively serve its purpose.

    He urged for a restructuring to facilitate more direct and constructive communication between staff and the Chief Justice.

    Addressing the theme of the 2024 durbar, “Building the Pillars of Justice Delivery through Leadership, Innovation and Technology,” Otu commended the Chief Justice’s vision.

    He noted that embracing technology is crucial for modernizing justice delivery, citing the progress of the e-justice project and the need for all staff to develop digital skills.

    Otu also called for the reinstatement of staff who have been wrongfully dismissed, stressing the psychological impact of delayed appeals.

    He urged the Chief Justice and the Judicial Council to address these pending cases promptly to avoid further distress among staff.

    Overall, Otu’s remarks highlighted the critical need for timely action on salary reviews, effective communication channels, and embracing technological advancements to improve the judiciary’s efficiency and staff well-being.

  • Numbers of lawyers referred to GLC’s Disciplinary Committee over unethical practises alarming – CJ

    Numbers of lawyers referred to GLC’s Disciplinary Committee over unethical practises alarming – CJ

    Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Gertrude Araba Esaaba Torkornoo, has expressed serious concern over the rising number of legal practitioners being reported to the General Legal Council’s (GLC) Disciplinary Committee for unethical conduct.

    Speaking at the 2024/2025 Annual General Conference of the Ghana Bar Association, she warned against the growing trend of lawyers prioritizing wealth accumulation over ethical standards, a shift she described as alarming.

    In her address, Justice Torkornoo lamented that an increasing number of lawyers are facing disciplinary actions for failing to uphold professional ethics, particularly in their dealings with clients.

    “I must also, very unhappily, refer to the consistently increasing numbers of lawyers that are referred to the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council for unethical practices against their clients,” she stated.

    The Chief Justice emphasized that the legal profession should not be viewed as a fast track to wealth, but rather as a noble calling that requires integrity, dedication, and a strong moral compass. She criticized the notion that becoming a lawyer guarantees early financial success, urging practitioners to see their roles as guardians of the law first and foremost.

    “There seems to be an untoward notion that the law is the root of becoming rich early. However, as officers and guardians of law, I implore lawyers to appreciate their sacred role and reduce the treatment of the law only as an avenue for wealth creation,” she stressed.

    In response to these concerns, Justice Torkornoo revealed that the General Legal Council is working closely with the Council of Law Deans to introduce a stronger focus on legal ethics within law school curricula. This, she believes, will instill ethical principles in young lawyers from the outset of their training.

    “The General Legal Council is actively working, engaging the Council of Law Deans, concerning the mainstreaming of the study of legal ethics at the faculty level,” she disclosed.

    Justice Torkornoo concluded by urging lawyers to reflect on the critical role they play in society and to prioritize integrity over financial motives.

  • New Traffic Law bars Speaker, Chief Justice from using sirens on the road

    New Traffic Law bars Speaker, Chief Justice from using sirens on the road

    A new road traffic Legislative Instrument (L.I.) has sparked debate in Parliament, as it excludes the Speaker of Parliament and the Chief Justice from the list of high-ranking public officials permitted to use a siren and motorcade in their official vehicles.

    This omission was highlighted by former Minority Leader Haruna Iddrisu after the L.I. was laid before Parliament.

    Expressing his concerns, Iddrisu emphasized the significance of the Speaker’s role in the nation’s governance structure, arguing that it is inappropriate for such a high-ranking official to be excluded from this privilege.

    “Without personalising it, it is not Alban Sumana Bagbin. It is the Speaker of Ghana’s Parliament, and he is not entitled to a motorcade or a police siren? In my view, Mr. Speaker, it is wrong for the number three to be out of this privilege,” Mr Iddrisu remarked.

    He further noted the exclusion of the Chief Justice from the Motor Traffic Regulation, stressing the importance of recognizing the four key personalities in the Republic: the President, the Vice President, the Speaker, and the Chief Justice.

    The Legislative Instrument had been previously withdrawn following public backlash over a proposal to grant Members of Parliament (MPs) similar privileges.

    Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin also expressed his concern over the exclusion, suggesting that it could hinder MPs in performing their duties effectively. “Politicians are always in a rush to save their heads when there is a crisis, but sometimes we can have a collective fall. We know the challenges we face coming from home and going to our constituencies,” he said.

    Afenyo-Markin questioned the self-restraint imposed on MPs, pointing out the necessity for politicians to handle public criticism and defend their positions.

    “We belittle ourselves. You are a politician, and you cannot take public bashing and go and explain to the public? Even you have MPs criticising Article 71 benefits that they have benefitted from, and we hear them on radio, and they continue to benefit? We have to take our democracy a little more seriously,” he argued.

    Meanwhile, Speaker Alban Bagbin urged MPs to be assertive and to stand firm in defending their positions.

    He emphasized the leadership role that MPs and the President are elected to fulfill, stating, “Today, when you are talking about a major democracy and spineless Parliament, leadership matters. You must be prepared to take responsibility and defend your positions. If the people knew like you, they will not elect you to lead them, and so they expect you to lead them and be able to persuade them that you are doing so in their interest.”

    Bagbin underscored the importance of leadership, reminding MPs of their duty to improve the conditions of the people they represent: “There are only two people elected on December 7 every election year, and they are the President and the MP, and the two of you are to lead the people to make their condition better.”

  • Stop abusing your power and being capricious – Sam George to CJ over anti-LGBTQ case delay

    Stop abusing your power and being capricious – Sam George to CJ over anti-LGBTQ case delay

    Ningo-Prampram Member of Parliament, Sam Nartey George, has called out Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo for what he describes as the arbitrary and capricious handling of the ongoing legal challenge surrounding the anti-LGBTQ bill.

    Sam George’s frustration stems from the delay in ruling on injunction applications that are blocking the transmission of the controversial Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill to President Nana Akufo-Addo for assent.

    Addressing the media, Sam George did not mince words, accusing the Chief Justice of abusing her authority under Article 296 of the Constitution.

    He expressed his disappointment with how long the case has been drawn out.

    “It is an abuse of her powers under Article 296 of the constitution. She is acting arbitrarily, capriciously, and maliciously. We will take her on for that,” Sam George declared.

    Initially, supporters of the anti-LGBTQ bill had planned a protest for August 21, 2024, to express their dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court’s delay. However, the demonstration has been rescheduled to September 21, 2024.

    The controversy stems from the court’s postponement of its decision on the injunction applications filed by Broadcast Journalist Richard Dela Sky and Researcher Dr. Amanda Odoi.

    The pair seeks to prevent the bill from being forwarded to the President. The Chief Justice, who presides over a five-member panel, has stated that the court will issue its ruling on the injunction applications together with its final judgment, indicating that an expedited trial is in the best interest of justice.

    Public interest has surged as the Supreme Court navigates legal arguments from both sides. Richard Dela Sky’s challenge questions the bill’s constitutionality, suggesting it infringes on fundamental rights enshrined in the 1992 Constitution.

    Meanwhile, Dr. Amanda Odoi’s concerns center on the bill’s lack of a fiscal impact analysis, raising potential conflicts with Article 108 of the Constitution.

    In defense of Parliament’s actions, Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame argued that the Speaker of Parliament acted within his constitutional authority when transmitting the bill to the President, asserting that no additional fiscal evaluation was necessary beyond what the bill itself mandates.

    Thaddeus Sory, representing the Speaker of Parliament, echoed similar sentiments, asserting that the legislative process is still ongoing and therefore not subject to premature interference by the Supreme Court. He contended that until the President signs the bill into law, it remains outside the court’s jurisdiction.

    The Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the anti-LGBTQ bill, was passed by Parliament on February 28, 2024, after a three-year-long journey through legislative processes. However, it remains in legal limbo until the court resolves the ongoing case and clears the way for its potential signing into law.

  • 12 small credit and debt recovery courts inaugurated by Chief Justice

    12 small credit and debt recovery courts inaugurated by Chief Justice

    Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkonoo, has inaugurated 12 specialized courts aimed at handling small claims and debt recovery cases.

    Of these new courts, eight are located in the Greater Accra Region and four in the Ashanti Region.

    The establishment of these courts follows a notable increase in small claims filed at district courts in Ghana, largely due to the volume of cases from Bills MicroCredit.

    Justice Torkonoo revealed that over 70% of the cases filed by Bills MicroCredit involved claims under GHC 5,000.

    This surge has significantly increased the workload of district courts, which were already facing challenges with the court shift system implemented by the Judicial Service.

    To address this issue, the Judicial Service, with support from Bills MicroCredit, has set up these small claims and debt recovery courts. These courts will operate every weekday afternoon and on Saturdays.

    “For the Greater Accra Region, District Court, Ashaiman, District Court, Teshie, District Court, Kasoa and District Court, La, will operate as the Saturday courts while District Court, Weija, District Court, Sowutuom, District Court ‘2’, Adenta and District Court, Gbese will operate as the weekday afternoon courts,” Chief Justice Torkonoo noted during the opening of the courts.


    At the La District Court’s opening, Chief Justice Torkonoo thanked Bills MicroCredit for their support in establishing the new courts.

    CEO of Bills MicroCredit, Richard Quaye, emphasized the benefits of these courts for their business.

    He noted that his company has filed 30,000 cases nationwide and highlighted the challenges of managing the large volume of defaulters.

    ‘One significant challenge we have faced is the sheer volume of defaulters resulting in our need to resort to the courts for recovery — over 30,000 — filed by our company seeking expedited hearings.

    “The establishment of the new Small Claims Court will greatly alleviate the burden on our judicial system, ensuring that cases are resolved more quickly and efficiently,” Richard Quaye said at the opening of the courts.

  • Chief Justice launches 12 special courts for handling of small credit, debt recovery cases

    Chief Justice launches 12 special courts for handling of small credit, debt recovery cases

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo has inaugurated 12 special courts dedicated to handling small claims and debt recovery cases, with eight located in the Greater Accra Region and four in the Ashanti Region.

    This initiative was prompted by a significant increase in small claims cases at the district courts, largely due to filings by Bills MicroCredit.

    Justice Esaaba Torkonoo highlighted that over 70% of these cases involved claims of less than GHC 5,000. The surge in cases overwhelmed the district courts, undermining the Judicial Service’s shift system.

    To address this, the Judicial Service, with support from Bills MicroCredit, established these specialized courts. They will operate every weekday afternoon and on Saturdays to manage the caseload effectively.

    “For the Greater Accra Region, District Court, Ashaiman, District Court, Teshie, District Court, Kasoa and District Court, La, will operate as the Saturday courts while District Court, Weija, District Court, Sowutuom, District Court ‘2’, Adenta and District Court, Gbese will operate as the weekday afternoon courts,” Chief Justice Torkonoo noted during the opening of the courts.

    During the opening of the new courts at the La District Courts, the Chief Justice expressed gratitude to Bills MicroCredit for their support in establishing these 12 special courts.

    Richard Quaye, the CEO of Bills MicroCredit, remarked that these courts would significantly benefit their business operations, noting that they have already filed 30,000 cases nationwide.

    ‘One significant challenge we have faced is the sheer volume of defaulters resulting in our need to resort to the courts for recovery — over 30,000 — filed by our company seeking expedited hearings.

    “The establishment of the new Small Claims Court will greatly alleviate the burden on our judicial system, ensuring that cases are resolved more quickly and efficiently,” Richard Quaye said at the opening of the courts.

  • Stop acting at snail-pace and expedite anti-LGBTQ trial – Sam George to Chief Justice

    Stop acting at snail-pace and expedite anti-LGBTQ trial – Sam George to Chief Justice

    Lead advocate for the anti-LGBTQ bill, Samuel Nartey George, is calling on Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo to hasten the judicial process that has delayed the bill’s transmission to President Akufo-Addo for approval.

    The Supreme Court has postponed its ruling on injunction applications by Dr. Amanda Odoi and Broadcast Journalist Richard Sky, which aim to block the bill’s transmission, opting to issue the ruling on the same day as the final judgment.

    In an interview with Citi News, Ningo-Prampram MP Samuel Nartey George emphasized the need for the Chief Justice to expedite the case to reach a prompt resolution.

    “Even during vacation, the court sits and hears matters of great importance and national importance that require urgency. The court can sit during the vacation. And so that is what we are demanding, that this matter is a critical matter,” George stated.

    He further criticized the delay, noting, “The matter has been pending since March. Other cases that came after this were of equal importance, and she disposed of them expeditiously.”

    George questioned the Chief Justice’s slow handling of the case, saying, “So why is the Chief Justice behaving at a snail’s pace or acting at a snail’s pace in this? It is contrary to the Chief Justice’s own religious belief that she espouses on the altar of the ICGC in Tema. It is also contrary to the traditional authority she comes under in the Central Region. And so the Chief Justice must act expeditiously in pursuit of what she professes.”

  • Sam George to lead demonstration against Chief Justice over delay in sending bill to Akufo-Addo

    Sam George to lead demonstration against Chief Justice over delay in sending bill to Akufo-Addo

    Supporters of the anti-LGBTQ bill have announced plans to protest against the Chief Justice on August 21, 2024, due to what they consider a delay in forwarding the bill to the President.

    The Supreme Court postponed its decision on the injunction requests from Dr. Amanda Odoi and Broadcast Journalist Richard Sky concerning the bill’s transmission to the President, choosing instead to deliver the ruling on the same day as the final judgment.

    Samuel Nartey George, the lead sponsor of the anti-LGBTQ bill, made this statement during a visit with some minority members to the National Chief Imam and the Acting President of the Osu Traditional Council.

    He promised a peaceful demonstration to ensure the bill reaches the President for approval.

    “We want to do a peaceful march on the 21st of August to the Chief Justice because right now it is not the president that is holding it. It is the Chief Justice. She is the one who is preventing parliament from sending it to the president.”

    “…The people of Ghana just want her to do what we pay her salary for. Hear the case and give a judgement…If you don’t give a judgement, we are all hanging in the air,” he stated.

  • You can accuse me of defamation; I’m not bothered – Sophia Akuffo to SSNIT

    You can accuse me of defamation; I’m not bothered – Sophia Akuffo to SSNIT

    Former Chief Justice, Sophia Akuffo, has criticized the recent botched sale of SSNIT shares in hotels as indicative of a broader problem in Ghana.

    She claims that those responsible for managing state institutions often intentionally deplete and sell assets among themselves, a practice detrimental to the country’s interests.

    In a TV3 interview, Madam Akuffo expressed that she was unsurprised by SSNIT’s justifications, noting that such practices have long been prevalent in the public sector.

    “Of course, SSNIT will justify it because they have run down the hotels, and just like in the public sector, a lot of public properties have been run down just so that the value will be run down, and always at the end of some cycle or the other, they do sweetheart deals and do this distribution among themselves. SSNIT can say I have defamed them, but I don’t care.”


    Sophia Akuffo explained why the attempt to sell SSNIT shares to Rock City Hotel, owned by Minister of Food and Agriculture Bryan Acheampong, was fraught with conflict of interest and detrimental to the country’s interests.

    “Yes, of course, because conflict of interest is conflict of interest. You can’t be the judge and the jury, you can’t be the lawyer and the judge, you can’t be the litigant, and after you have given your evidence and everything, your lawyer has done his submission, and it is time to determine the outcome, and now you are going to sit among the jury and you want to be part of that.”

    “Conflict of interest is not defined by the individual. Sometimes a conflict of interest, when you are managing standards, it is part of the performance standards. When you are managing ethical standards, sometimes it is simply perception.

    “Will a reasonable man in the street, if you were to tell them of this, what will they say about it? If here, you can surmise that they will say it smells, then it smells. When you are a public person, just because there is no law that says you cannot do it does not mean you should do it. Even in the Bible, it says I can do all things, but not all things are good.”

    It is worth noting that on Friday, July 12, SSNIT’s board of directors announced the cancellation of its plan to sell shares in the Labadi Beach, La Palm, Ridge Royal, and Elmina Beach hotels located in the Greater Accra and Central regions.

    “The Board and management of Social Security and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT) wish to inform the public that the process to divest 60% of SSNIT’s stake in the hotels has been terminated,” Board Chair of SSNIT Elizabeth Akua Ohene said in the statement.

  • Step down from office – NDC to CJ over judicial appointment recommendation

    Step down from office – NDC to CJ over judicial appointment recommendation

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has called for the resignation of Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Torkornoo, accusing her of pursuing a “self-seeking” agenda in the recent recommendation of judges to the Supreme Court.

    This demand was made by the party’s National Communications Officer, Sammy Adu Gyamfi, who criticized the Chief Justice’s actions as unconstitutional and detrimental to the national interest.

    Speaking on JoyNews’ PM Express, Adu Gyamfi highlighted procedural flaws in Chief Justice Torkornoo’s approach but emphasized that the underlying issue is her alleged intent to influence the judiciary with personal preferences.

    “What she has done is totally wrong, it was totally uncalled for, it is unconstitutional and I think she must eat humble pie, concede this fact, and make amends. But beyond the procedural flaws for me is the whole agenda and intention behind the action,” he stated.

    Adu Gyamfi further elaborated that if the Chief Justice had merely requested an increase in the number of Supreme Court justices to expedite pending cases, procedural lapses might be forgivable.

    However, her actions go beyond this, as she proposed specific judges to the President, raising concerns about her motivations.

    “That, for me, borders on her intents and agenda she has. It shows that this CJ is not interested in having more justices on the Supreme Court, but actually has her own preference of friends, allies, or people in the judiciary that she thinks should be appointed to the Supreme Court. That is problematic because that brings up these issues of conflict of interest,” Adu Gyamfi remarked.

    He expressed further concern over the Chief Justice’s dual role as the Chairperson of the Judicial Council, which advises the President on judicial appointments.

    He argued that this position should not be used to influence the President’s choices based on personal preferences, stating, “That should tell you clearly, that the main motivation for the CJ is not what we are being told or for the speedy determination of matters before the Supreme Court but to have the preferences of this Chief Justice appointed onto the Supreme Court. And that is why, for me, I think this is reason enough for this chief justice to resign.”

    In a letter dated May 30, 2024, addressed to President Nana Akufo-Addo, Chief Justice Torkornoo recommended the appointment of five judges to the Supreme Court: Justice Angelina Mensah Homiah, Justice Eric Kyei Baffour, Justice Edward Amoako Asante, Justice Cyra Pamela C.A. Koranteng, and Justice Afia Asare Botwe.

    The NDC has accused both the President and the Chief Justice of conspiring to protect current government officials from future accountability.

    On July 4, NDC General Secretary Fifi Kwetey expressed concerns over the nomination of the five justices, describing it as unjust and lacking transparency. He called for the decision to be challenged, emphasizing the need for fairness in the judicial appointment process.

    In response, the Majority in Parliament, represented by Alex Afenyo-Markin, defended the Chief Justice’s proposal to increase the number of Supreme Court judges to 20.

    Afenyo-Markin insisted that the recommendation is within legal boundaries and that no laws were violated in the Chief Justice’s actions.

    As this controversy unfolds, the call for the Chief Justice’s resignation by Sammy Adu Gyamfi underscores the ongoing

  • There is nothing illegal about this – Majority defends CJ on Justices recommendation

    There is nothing illegal about this – Majority defends CJ on Justices recommendation

    Majority caucus in Parliament has defended the Chief Justice’s recommendation to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court bench, asserting that no illegality was committed.

    In a press briefing at Parliament House on Monday, July 8, Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin stated that the Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo’s suggestion was justified given the overwhelming number of cases pending before the apex court.

    “The Chief Justice has not done anything illegal, immoral nor unconstitutional in respect of her recommendation for the need to increase the number of justices at the Supreme Court,” he said.

    In a letter addressed to the President, the Chief Justice recommended the appointment of Justices Afia Serwah Asare-Botwe, Cyra Pamela Koranteng, Eric Kyei Baffour, Edward Amoako Asante, and Angelina Mensah Homiah, all currently serving on the Court of Appeal, to the Supreme Court bench.

    She argued that this expansion would help the court manage the large number of pending cases.

    Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin, speaking at Parliament House on Monday, July 8, stated that the Chief Justice’s proposal to increase the number of Supreme Court justices to 20 was aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of justice delivery.

    He countered claims that the Chief Justice lacked the authority to make such a proposal, citing Article 125(4) of the Constitution, which grants the Chief Justice inherent powers as the head of the Judiciary to make such recommendations.

    “The Chief Justice shall subject to this constitution, be head of the judiciary, and shall be responsible for the administration and supervision of the judiciary,” he quoted article 125 (5).

    “When somebody is in charge of the management of a body, he is able to determine how to run the place efficiently and what will make the work of that institution to be properly done and to make proposals within the context of the law,” he said.

    Touching on what the law says on the composition of the Supreme Court, Mr Afenyo-Markin quoted Article 128 (1) of the Constitution which provides that “The Supreme Court shall consist of the Chief Justice and not less than nine other Justices of the Supreme Court.”

    He argued that the framers of the Constitution, in their wisdom, gave a minimum sealing in anticipation that there could be the possibility in the future to increase the number of Justices at the apex that.

    “That is why they did not provide for upper sealing; so, if you read this and juxtapose against article 125 (4) clearly you cannot argue that any increase in the number of judges at the Supreme Court above 10 is unconstitutional or that the CJ is wrong in making such suggestion or proposal,” he said.

    The Majority Leader addressed critiques surrounding the Chief Justice’s proposal, emphasizing that critics overlooked the detailed justification provided in her analysis. He clarified that the Chief Justice did not simply forward a proposal without substantiation but presented compelling arguments to support it.

    Regarding consultations, he noted that the Ghana Bar Association and other stakeholders were consulted, with the Bar Association expressing agreement in principle to the proposal to expand the court.

    On the timing of the appointment, Mr. Afenyo-Markin stressed that the Judiciary, entrusted with the constitutional duty to administer justice, operates independently of the country’s electoral schedule.

    “The impression these critics try to create is that all that the Supreme Court does is to determine political cases but I can tell on authority that the political cases that go to the SC may not even be up to two per cent of the cases that they deal with.

    “So, the narrow path taken by these critics to create the impression about the timing of the proposal is neither here nor there. In any event, to what use or benefit will it be to the President to pack the court or do last minute appointments,” he said.

    Of all the current judges at the Supreme Court, the Leader said there were two justices – Justice Paul Baffoe Bonney and Justice Gabriel Pwamang – who were not appointed by the President.

    “As astute politician as the President is known to be, I do not think that he will want to trigger a debate in the public domain to poison the atmosphere. He will not do that,” he said.

  • Chief Justice has the mandate to request for more Supreme Court judges – Majority

    Chief Justice has the mandate to request for more Supreme Court judges – Majority

    The Majority in Parliament has rallied behind Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Torkornoo’s proposal to expand the Supreme Court’s bench to 20 judges.

    This move comes in response to the Chief Justice’s submission of five judges for nomination to President Akufo-Addo, citing the escalating caseload faced by the judiciary.

    The proposal has sparked criticism from the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), which has labeled it as unlawful.

    However, Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has vehemently defended the Chief Justice’s authority to make such recommendations, asserting that it falls well within the legal frameworks.

    Addressing journalists in Accra on Monday, Afenyo-Markin stated, “We’ve become aware that the chief justice has mooted a proposal to expand the supreme court to 20 judges for efficiency and effectiveness. Some people are saying that the Chief Justice does not have such a mandate to do so. We disagree and would say that per article 125 (4) of the constitution, there are some inherent powers provided for in this provision that allow the Chief Justice as a chief executive and head of the judiciary to make such proposals.”

    He further elaborated, “The framers of our constitution in their wisdom gave us a minimum ceiling. What did they anticipate? The anticipation was that there could be a possibility in future to increase the number. That is why they did not provide for an upper ceiling… So if you read this and juxtapose it against the 125, 125, 4 that I earlier referred to, clearly you cannot argue that any increase in the number of judges at the Supreme Court above 10 is unconstitutional or that the chief justice is wrong in making such a suggestion or proposal.”

    Afenyo-Markin emphasized the Chief Justice’s role in overseeing the judiciary’s administration and stressed her prerogative to propose measures aimed at enhancing operational efficiency within the bounds of the law.

  • ADR week to be observed from July 15 to 19

    ADR week to be observed from July 15 to 19

    Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has designated July 15 to 19, 2024, as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Week nationwide.

    This will be the second of three ADR observances held annually, with the others occurring in March and November.

    A press release signed by Alex Nartey, National Coordinator of ADR, announced, “The rationale for the ADR week is to afford the ADR Directorate of the Judicial Service the opportunity to inform the citizenry of the presence of ADR within the court system, its importance in seeking justice, and how to take advantage of such an important process for meaningful access to justice, especially for the poor and the vulnerable,” it added.

    The release explained, “It is also to afford court users whose cases are pending before the courts the benefit of using ADR during the week under the ‘Mass Mediation Exercise.’”

    The theme for the week is “Building the Pillars of Justice through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).”

    It also stated, “The week will allow court users with pending cases to benefit from ADR through the ‘Mass Mediation Exercise.’”

    A total of 138 courts, including 35 Circuit Courts and 103 District Courts, will participate by dedicating the entire week to resolving court cases via ADR across the country.

    Throughout the week, judges, magistrates, and ADR officials will conduct courtroom education sessions to enhance public understanding of ADR.

    The Bar (lawyers), disputants, media, and the general public are encouraged to participate fully and cooperate with the Judicial Service to ensure the success of this Legal Year Term’s ADR Week.

    The release concluded by noting that ADR has been integrated into the adjudication process of the Judicial Service of Ghana as “Court-Connected ADR.”

  • Petition to oust OSP dismissed by Chief Justice

    Petition to oust OSP dismissed by Chief Justice

    The Chief Justice, Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo, has rejected a petition calling for the removal of Special Prosecutor Kissi Agyebeng from office.

    Former Attorney-General Martin Amidu urged President Akufo-Addo to dismiss Mr. Agyebeng in a letter dated April 30, 2024.

    The petition was subsequently forwarded to Justice Torkornoo on May 6, 2024.

    However, the Chief Justice found the petition lacking in merit and dismissed it.

    Amidu, the former Special Prosecutor, alleged serious misconduct in his petition, including procurement irregularities in the purchase of vehicles for the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) and abuses of power involving judges and the administration of justice, which he argued justified Agyebeng’s removal.

    But the Chief Justice determined that Amidu’s petition failed to provide sufficient evidence and legal grounds to substantiate the allegations, thus not meeting the threshold for establishing a prima facie case for Agyebeng’s removal as Special Prosecutor.

    The Chief Justice concluded that the petition lacked the factual and legal basis necessary to warrant further investigation or action.

    Martin Amidu confirming the decision of the Chief Justice stated, “I have today received a one-page letter from the Presidency with reference number OSP 307/24/659 dated 2 July 2024 notifying me that: “…. the Honourable Chief Justice, Mrs. Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo, has submitted her review of the existence or absence of a prima facie case with respect to your petition.

    “I was then informed that: “In accordance with section 15 (3) of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017, the Chief Justice determined that the factual and legal foundation of the petition fall short of the standard required to establish a prima facie case for the removal of the Special Prosecutor,” a piece allegedly written by Mr Amidu said.

  • Jakpa’s petition of bias by trial judge in ambulance case dismissed by Chief Justice

    Jakpa’s petition of bias by trial judge in ambulance case dismissed by Chief Justice

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has rejected a petition filed by businessman Richard Jakpa, claiming unfair treatment and rights violations during his trial in the controversial ambulance procurement case.

    Mr. Jakpa, the third accused in the ongoing trial, had sought the transfer of trial judge Afia Serwaa Botwe, citing perceived bias and mistreatment.

    In his petition, Mr. Jakpa alleged that he had been denied basic rights and fair treatment throughout the trial proceedings. He accused the judge of bias, denying him legal representation, and even restricting his access to necessary facilities like restroom breaks.

    However, Chief Justice Torkornoo, responding to Mr. Jakpa’s concerns, stated that he had failed to provide substantial evidence to support his claims of unfair treatment.

    The Chief Justice pointed out that Mr. Jakpa’s allegations lacked sufficient backing from court records or other substantiating evidence.

    In an interview with JoyNews following the Chief Justice’s decision, Mr. Jakpa expressed shock at the dismissal of his petition.

    He criticized the Chief Justice for not independently verifying his claims by reviewing court recordings and other trial proceedings.

    “I got a response from the Chief Justice, a surprise response that I didn’t provide evidence so she cannot transfer the judge. She didn’t say what I am saying is not true,” Mr. Jakpa stated, highlighting his disappointment with the outcome.

    Mr. Jakpa’s allegations have stirred controversy surrounding the fairness and conduct of the trial, which involves allegations of corruption and mismanagement in the procurement of ambulances.

    Despite his claims, the trial continues with Mr. Jakpa and other defendants facing serious charges related to the misuse of public funds.

    The Chief Justice’s decision underscores the importance of substantiating allegations with concrete evidence in legal petitions, especially when challenging the conduct of judicial proceedings.

  • Retract “unconstitutional” Supreme Court judges recommendation to Akufo-Addo – NDC to Chief Justice

    Retract “unconstitutional” Supreme Court judges recommendation to Akufo-Addo – NDC to Chief Justice

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has formally called upon Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo to retract her recommendation to President Akufo-Addo regarding the appointment of new Supreme Court judges, citing concerns over constitutionality.

    In a press statement released today, the opposition party expressed strong reservations about the Chief Justice’s recent letter advising President Akufo-Addo to nominate five judges to the Supreme Court. According to the NDC, such a recommendation represents a breach of constitutional norms and threatens the independence of the judiciary.

    “The NDC urges Chief Justice Torkonoo to retract her recommendation to President Akufo-Addo for the appointment of new Supreme Court judges,” stated Fiifi Kwetey, the General Secretary of the NDC, during a media briefing.

    “This action undermines the principles of judicial independence and could set a dangerous precedent for the politicization of Ghana’s judiciary.”

    Kwetey emphasized the importance of upholding constitutional safeguards that ensure the judiciary operates free from political interference. He stressed that the appointment of judges to the highest court in the land should adhere strictly to meritocratic principles and due process, rather than being influenced by political agendas.

    The controversy arose following Chief Justice Torkonoo’s letter dated May 30, 2024, recommending five individuals for appointment to the Supreme Court, including Justice Afia Serwaa Asare Botwe, who currently presides over significant legal proceedings.

    In light of these developments, the NDC has called for a retraction of the recommendation and urged Chief Justice Torkonoo to uphold the judiciary’s role as an independent arbiter in Ghanaian democracy. The party underscored its commitment to safeguarding democratic institutions and ensuring they remain resilient against political interference.

    As the debate unfolds, stakeholders continue to monitor the situation closely, recognizing the critical importance of maintaining judicial integrity and independence in Ghana. The NDC remains steadfast in its advocacy for transparent and constitutional processes in the appointment of judges, aiming to preserve the judiciary’s credibility and effectiveness in upholding justice.

  • Akufo-Addo, CJ assaulting our judicial independence with “unconstitutional” SC judges recommendation – NDC

    Akufo-Addo, CJ assaulting our judicial independence with “unconstitutional” SC judges recommendation – NDC

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has vehemently criticized President Nana Akufo-Addo and Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo, accusing them of undermining judicial independence through what they deem an “unconstitutional” recommendation to appoint new Supreme Court judges.

    In a strongly-worded statement released today, the NDC condemned the recent move by Chief Justice Torkonoo to advise President Akufo-Addo to nominate five new judges to the Supreme Court.

    According to the opposition party, this action represents a blatant attempt by the Executive to exert undue influence over the judiciary, compromising its impartiality and integrity.

    “The blatant unconstitutional actions of President Akufo-Addo and Chief Justice Torkonoo are not just political manoeuvres. They are a direct assault on our judicial independence and the very soul of our democracy,” declared Fiifi Kwetey, the General Secretary of the NDC, during a press conference.

    Kwetey further highlighted the potential dangers of such actions, suggesting that they could transform Ghana’s judiciary into a mere extension of the Executive branch, used for political purposes rather than upholding justice.

    “Imagine a Ghana where the Judiciary becomes a tool for political retribution rather than justice. This is not the Ghana we pledged to fight for,” he added, underscoring the NDC’s commitment to preserving democratic principles and judicial autonomy.

    The NDC’s criticism stems from Chief Justice Torkonoo’s letter to President Akufo-Addo dated May 30, 2024, wherein she recommended the appointment of five new judges to the Supreme Court.

    Among the nominees is Justice Afia Serwaa Asare Botwe, who currently presides over the contentious ambulance procurement trial involving Ato Forson and others.

    As the debate intensifies, the NDC has called upon Chief Justice Torkonoo to retract her recommendation, urging her to uphold the principles of judicial independence enshrined in Ghana’s constitution. The opposition party remains vigilant in its stance against any actions that could undermine the judiciary’s role as a pillar of democracy in Ghana.

  • We need more Supreme Court judges to address several pending cases – Chief Justice

    We need more Supreme Court judges to address several pending cases – Chief Justice

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo has justified the appointment of five new judges to the Supreme Court of Ghana, citing the pressing need to address the backlog of cases currently burdening the judiciary.

    In a letter dated May 30, 2024, addressed to President Nana Akufo-Addo, Chief Justice Torkonoo officially recommended the nomination of five judges to bolster the Supreme Court’s capacity.

    Among the nominees is Justice Afia Serwaa Asare Botwe, who is currently presiding over the contentious ambulance procurement trial involving Ato Forson, among others.

    The other nominees include Justice Cyra Pamela Koranteng, Justice Edward Amoako Asante, Justice Eric Kyei Baffuour, and Justice Angelina Mensah Homiah.

    Speaking on the matter, Chief Justice Torkonoo highlighted the overwhelming workload faced by the Supreme Court, emphasizing that the addition of more judges is crucial to expedite pending cases and ensure timely justice delivery.

    “There are several cases pending, and that is why we need more Supreme Court judges,” she stressed.

    The call for additional judges comes amidst criticism from the National Democratic Congress (NDC), who have labeled the Chief Justice’s recommendation as unconstitutional.

    Fiifi Kwetey, the General Secretary of the NDC, expressed concerns over what he described as an attempt by the Executive to undermine judicial independence.

    “The blatant unconstitutional actions of President Akufo-Addo and Chief Justice Torkonoo are a direct assault on our judicial independence and the soul of our democracy,” Kwetey remarked during a press conference.

    Kwetey further urged Chief Justice Torkonoo to retract her recommendation to President Akufo-Addo, cautioning against the judiciary becoming a political tool rather than a pillar of justice in Ghana.

    “Imagine a Ghana where the Judiciary becomes a mere extension of a failed Executive – a tool for political retribution rather than justice. This is not the Ghana we pledged to fight for,” he added.

  • Chief Justice petitioned over alleged bias by trial judge in ambulance case

    Chief Justice petitioned over alleged bias by trial judge in ambulance case

    Richard Jakpa, the third accused in the ongoing ambulance trial, has petitioned the Chief Justice, alleging unfair treatment throughout the legal proceedings.

    Jakpa claims that his basic human rights and privileges have been repeatedly denied during the trial.

    In an interview with JoyNews, Jakpa expressed his grievances, stating, “Right from the beginning of this trial till today, I have not been treated fairly at all by the judge. I am saying that because I have written a petition to the Chief Justice on this. So, I am not speaking out of a vacuum, and it is recorded. It is documented.”

    Jakpa detailed various instances of perceived bias and rights violations in his petition. He accused the judge of denying him legal representation, basic needs such as restroom access, and engaging him inappropriately in court.

    He believes these actions indicate that the judge has already presumed his guilt, and he is merely fulfilling procedural requirements.

    Additionally, Jakpa accused Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame of prosecuting the case against Minority Leader Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson for political reasons.

    Jakpa suggested that Forson posed a threat to government interests, particularly regarding the contentious E-levy, and that the prosecution was a tactic to silence him.

    “Attorney General came to court purely on political convenience and mischief to imprison Hon. Ato Forson, and this stems from the E-levy. Because Honorable Ato Forson was the ranking member for the NDC in Parliament and he was giving them a headache, he was frustrating and being meticulous on the figures that Ken Ofori-Atta was bringing to Parliament,” Jakpa asserted.

    He further alleged that the accusations against him were part of a strategy to mask the political motivations behind the Attorney General’s actions. Jakpa claimed that former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta had influenced Dame to prosecute Forson to intimidate him and reduce his critical oversight in Parliament.

    Deputy Attorney General Alfred Tuah Yeboah refuted Jakpa’s allegations, defending Dame’s integrity and professionalism. Yeboah emphasized Dame’s competence and success in both local and international legal arenas.

    “If you look at the AGs that we have in Ghana, if he [Godfred Dame] is not the best, he will be one of the best when it comes to his courtroom appearance. Look at international arbitrations. An Attorney General who leads his team to go on international arbitration and win cases internationally, not locally. So if you say local champion, what does it mean?” Yeboah questioned.

  • Level of cravings, monies that people need is weird – CJ laments Ghanaians’ greed

    Level of cravings, monies that people need is weird – CJ laments Ghanaians’ greed

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has voiced concern over the growing prevalence of wealth accumulation in Ghanaian society, particularly within the business community.

    She highlighted that the relentless pursuit of wealth and possessions has fostered a culture of greed among the populace.

    “I don’t understand the level of cravings and the level of monies that people need. The figures are too high and too weird.

    “Those close to me, are they buying islands or something. What are they doing? What do they need all of this for?” she asked.

    These remarks were delivered by Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo at the Full Gospel Business Men Fellowship conference themed ‘Integrity of a Business Person.’

    During her speech, the Chief Justice acknowledged the challenges of maintaining integrity but emphasized that it is achievable through a commitment to Christian values.

    Additionally, Emmanuel Mahama, President of the Full Gospel Business Men Fellowship, lamented the detrimental effects of corruption on economies. He urged stakeholders to join forces in combating this scourge.

  • New High Court at Mampong inaugurated by Chief Justice

    New High Court at Mampong inaugurated by Chief Justice

    Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has inaugurated a new High Court in Mampong, Ashanti Region.

    The one-storey building, equipped with two courtrooms, will serve Juaben, Effiduase Asokore, Nsuta, Ejura Sekyedumase, and Agona.

    The facility includes two Judges’ Chambers, offices for Cashiers and Bailiffs, a docket room, an ADR room, and washrooms for staff and court users. It also features a five KVA Solar Power system and a 40 KVA generator as backup, along with a borehole to ensure a reliable water supply.

    In a statement issued by the Director of Communications of the Judicial Service, J.R. Ampong-Fosu, Chief Justice Torkornoo emphasized that access to justice is a critical value for the nation, highlighting the importance of ensuring that all citizens, particularly the vulnerable, can access justice.

    “Without justice, there can be no order, without order there can be no peace, without peace, there can be no prosperity. And so, for every nation that seeks to go forward, it is critical that access to justice is given to all and sundry, especially, the vulnerable.”

    Chief Justice Torkornoo said, “The edifice which has a long history is structured in such a way that the physically impaired can have access to it…. It contains facilities necessary for administration of justice in modern times.”

    She urged the staff of the Judicial Service who will be working at the new court to avoid any form of malpractice and to conduct their duties with integrity.

    ”The Judicial Service that functions with integrity, is the kind of service that the people of Ghana deserve. This is a Service in which Bailiffs do not exploit citizens. It is a Service that Registrars do not exploit citizens. It is a service in which justice delivery is done in an environment of transparency, propriety, independence, competence, diligence and appropriateness,” she said.

    Chief Justice Torkornoo paid tribute to her predecessors, Chief Justices Sophia Akuffo and Anin Yeboah, for their roles in making the opening of the new High Court building in Mampong a reality.

    She also commended the Paramount Chief of Mampong, Daasebre Osei Bonsu II, and the District Assembly Common Fund Administrator, Madam Irene Naa Torshie Addo, for their invaluable support.

    Daasebre Osei Bonsu II, who is also the President of the Mampong Traditional Council, appealed to the Chief Justice to assign more staff to the new court and requested additional courts with the necessary logistics, particularly a Circuit Court.

    “I would like to appeal to your good office to provide Mampong with a Circuit Court in addition. The Mampong Courts serve a very wide geographical area, as far as Ejura, Attebubu and Kajeji areas. With the provision of a Circuit Court, therefore, other lower cases could be handled to ease the pressure on the Magistrate Court as it is now.”

    On his part, the Mampong Municipal Chief Executive (MCE), Thomas Appiah Kubi, praised the Mamponghene “for his generosity in releasing this land for the construction of this edifice” and hoped it would be well maintained.

    Kwaku Ampratwum-Sarpong, the Member of Parliament for Mampong, expressed gratitude to all stakeholders for their significant contributions to the construction of the new courthouse.

    The Chief Justice was accompanied by Justice Cyra Pamela C. A. Koranteng, the Judicial Secretary, and other members of the Bench.

    The event was attended by the Queen Mother of Mampong, Nana Agyakoma Difie II, heads of institutions and agencies, the clergy, and members of the Mampong Municipal Assembly.

  • Why Chief Justice Tokornoo is a “strict” judge

    Why Chief Justice Tokornoo is a “strict” judge

    Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has said that she has had to be strict in her roles to effectively manage her office.

    She says it comes with the challenging nature of the job, for being a judge requires firmness in decision-making.

    In an exclusive interview with JoyNews, Chief Justice Torkornoo explains; “I am strict. I think that you can hardly be a judge without being strict because on a daily basis, a judge is handling something like 20 cases minimum.”

    She noted that judges must contend with assertive lawyers on both sides—some prepared, some unprepared, some with questionable motives, and others who are rarely present to do their work. Judges must navigate all these different personalities and attitudes.

    “If you don’t come to the bench with rules, you can hardly get your work done. Being a judge on the bench is about being strict. Strict with managing time, process, the different submissions, and managing the courtroom,” she said.

    Commenting on her practice directions and administrative guidelines aimed at expediting the wheels of justice during her short tenure as head of the judiciary, Chief Justice Torkornoo emphasized that her entire career has been dedicated to the practice of law.

    She noted that she has served as an external lawyer for various institutions and has been actively engaged in legal practice. This extensive experience, she stressed, has provided her with firsthand knowledge of the frustrations that come from attending court without achieving results.

    “I have known the pain of inefficient court staff, I have known the pain of processes that leave either a lawyer or party confused.

    “……Therefore, in becoming Chief Justice, all that was left was for me to implement those things that were already in the pipeline,” she added.

  • Special Prosecutor asked to respond to removal petition by Chief Justice

    Special Prosecutor asked to respond to removal petition by Chief Justice

    The Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, has forwarded a petition to remove Special Prosecutor Kissi Agyebeng to him for his response.

    This follows President Akufo-Addo’s submission of a petition to the Chief Justice seeking Agyebeng’s removal.

    The petition, lodged by former Special Prosecutor Martin Amidu, urges the President to dismiss Agyebeng and is dated April 30, 2024.

    It cites procurement irregularities in the acquisition of vehicles for the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) and accuses Agyebeng of misconduct involving judges and the administration of justice.

    In a letter dated Thursday, May 16, the Chief Justice requested Agyebeng’s comments to determine if a prima facie case has been established.

    “This is to forward to you a copy of the petition dated 30th April 2024 sent to the Office of the President which was forwarded to the Office of the Honourable Lady Chief Justice on 6th May 2024. Kindly provide your comments on the matters raised to enable the Honourable Chief Justice to determine if a prima facie case has been made out.”

  • Dual citizens now eligible for appointments as Chief Justice, Chief Directors – Supreme Court declares

    Dual citizens now eligible for appointments as Chief Justice, Chief Directors – Supreme Court declares

    In a majority ruling, the Supreme Court has deemed certain sections of the Citizenship Act unconstitutional.

    These sections previously barred individuals with dual citizenship from holding positions such as Chief Justice, Commissioner of the Value Added Tax Service, Director-General of Prisons Service, Chief Fire Officer, Chief Director of a Ministry, or a Colonel rank in the army or other security services.

    The court’s decision, delivered in the case of Francis Osei-Bonsu v The Attorney General, invalidated these sections of the Citizenship Act.

    The Plaintiff, represented by Bright Okyere-Adjekum Esq., saw all their claims upheld by the Supreme Court.

    Citing inconsistency with Article 289(2) of the 1992 Constitution, the Supreme Court nullified the aforementioned sections.

    Consequently, individuals with dual citizenship, contrary to the stipulations of section 16 of the Citizenship Act, are now eligible for appointment to various positions, including those previously restricted.

    According to the relief sought by the Plaintiff, the nullified sections effectively amended the 1992 Constitution of Ghana, thereby violating Article 289(2) of the Constitution.

  • CJ’s actions in Dafeamekpor’s injunction application case lawful – Gary Nimako

    CJ’s actions in Dafeamekpor’s injunction application case lawful – Gary Nimako

    A private practice lawyer and director of legal affairs for the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Gary Nimako Marfo, has defended Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Sackey Torkornoo’s decision to form a five-member panel to address an injunction application filed by Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor on Wednesday, 27 March 2024.

    During an interview on the Big Bulletin, Asaase Radio’s evening news analysis program with Kayleb Ahinakwah, on the same date, Nimako Marfo explained that the application by the NDC Member of Parliament for South Dayi was ready for hearing as the Attorney General had submitted its opposing affidavit and statement of case.

    He clarified that once all relevant parties had filed their documents, it was inconsequential if their lawyers were absent during the hearing, as the court had jurisdiction to proceed.

    “When you issue a writ, within 14 days, you need to file your statement of case, or you can do it together with the filing of the writ. When you do it, you have to serve the AG or all other parties that are of interest in the matter. Having done so, the AG and the other parties will have to respond whether immediately or within 14 days.

    “On the back of the injunction application, I do not understand why someone will say fixing the matter to be heard by a panel demonstrates that the Chief Justice is biased in the matter. I don’t get it. Clearly, whoever is saying this doesn’t understand how the judicial system works in this country, ” Gary Nimako further explained.

    Nimako Marfo emphasized the procedural timeline for filing documents and service, expressing confusion over criticism suggesting bias by the Chief Justice in constituting the panel. He argued that those making such claims lacked understanding of the judicial system.

    Regarding the urgency of the application, Nimako Marfo noted its significance and expressed surprise at attempts by the applicant and their lawyers to avoid service when the court was prepared to address the matter promptly.

    He highlighted the impact of the case on parliamentary duties, noting the reluctance of Parliament to approve ministerial nominees due to the pending injunction application. Nimako Marfo asserted that expeditious handling of such cases was necessary.

    The application in question, filed by Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor on Monday, 18 March 2024, sought a declaration of the unconstitutionality of not vetting ministers whose appointments were revoked and reassigned.

    President Akufo-Addo’s reshuffle on Wednesday, 14 February 2024, prompted the legal challenge, as Dafeamekpor argued that reassignments constituted new appointments requiring parliamentary approval.

    During the hearing, Dafeamekpor’s lawyers were absent, but the court proceeded after confirming service to all parties. The Attorney General and lawyers for the Speaker of Parliament opposed the injunction, leading to its dismissal by the Supreme Court on the grounds of being frivolous and an abuse of the court process.

  • “Chief Justice is engaged in judicial thuggery,” such partisan behaviour must not be tolerated – Sam George

    “Chief Justice is engaged in judicial thuggery,” such partisan behaviour must not be tolerated – Sam George

    Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampram, Sam George, has criticized Chief Justice Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo, accusing her of engaging in what he described as “judicial thuggery.”

    He believes this behaviour threatens the fair and equitable dispensation of justice.

    Sam George also suggested that the Chief Justice is influenced by political considerations, which he feels should not be tolerated in the Judiciary.

    Making his point clear in a post shared via X, he said “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the current Chief Justice is engaged in judicial thuggery and poses an existential threat to the dispensation of justice in an equitable, fair, and just manner.”

    He added “Such partisan behaviour at the apex of our judiciary must not be entertained and must be condemned with all the force reasonable people can muster. Judicial gangsterism is a precursor for the breakdown in the dispensation of justice and the doctrine of the rule of law. Common sense ought to be an ingredient in the dispensation of justice.”

    This criticism follows the Supreme Court’s decision to prioritize the hearing of Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor’s case challenging the constitutionality of the president’s ministerial nominations over the hearing of Richard Dela Sky’s suit seeking an injunction on the anti-gay bill.

    Despite Dafeamekpor’s suit being filed two weeks after Sky’s suit, the hearing for Dafeamekpor’s case was slated for March 27, 2024.

    Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has rejected an application for an injunction against the approval of President Akufo-Addo’s new ministerial appointees, filed by South Dayi legislator Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor.

    The court deemed the application frivolous and an abuse of court processes.

  • NDC accuses ‘biased’ Chief Justice of delaying Richard Sky’s anti-LGBTQ bill case

    NDC accuses ‘biased’ Chief Justice of delaying Richard Sky’s anti-LGBTQ bill case

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has raised concerns about the scheduling of political cases in the Supreme Court, accusing the Chief Justice of bias against them.

    The party’s alarm stems from the prioritization of the case filed by South Dayi MP, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, for hearing, over the case of Richard Dela Sky v. the Parliament of Ghana and the Attorney-General.

    According to a statement issued by the NDC on Wednesday, March 27, 2024, it is intriguing that “Richard Dela Sky filed his writ of summons in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024, on the 5th of March 2024. This was almost two (2) clear weeks before Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor filed his writ of summons on 18th March, 2024 challenging the constitutionality of the latest ministerial nominations by the President.”

    However, the Chief Justice has scheduled Dafeamekpor’s case for today, Wednesday, March 27, ahead of the Dela Sky matter, which was filed earlier.

    Fifi Fiavi Kwetey, NDC’s General Secretary, noted in a statement that “given the recent political deadlock that these two legal suits have created between the Executive arm and the Legislative arm of government, one would have expected that the date of filing of the cases would have informed the timing of their hearing by the apex Court.”

    The statement also alleges that the scheduling of the cases is a tactic by the Head of the Judiciary to support the President’s intention to shelve the anti-LGBTQ bill, which has become a matter of concern in the country.

    “It’s quite apparent, that this is a ploy by the Chief Justice to fast-track the determination of the suit filed by Hon. Rockson Dafeamekpor, while the determination of the Richard Dela Sky suit is deliberately and unduly delayed, to enable the President shelve the crucial Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill that has been passed by Parliament,” it added.

  • Chief Justice introduces court shift system to improve judicial efficiency accessibility

    Chief Justice introduces court shift system to improve judicial efficiency accessibility


    Chief Justice, Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has initiated a court shift system in specific courts aimed at improving efficiency and accessibility in dispensing justice nationwide.

    This new system, slated to commence on March 25, 2024, will be implemented initially as a pilot program.

    Under this arrangement, courts will hold two sessions each day: a morning session from 8:30 am to 1:30 pm and an afternoon session from 2:00 pm to 6:30 pm.

    This scheduling aims to accommodate more cases and provide greater flexibility for both court officials and litigants.

    According to a directive issued by Justice Cyra Pamela C.A. Koranteng, the Judicial Secretary, the pilot program will initially involve several courts, including Adentan High Court 1 and 2, Amasaman High Court 2, Weija Circuit Court, La and Teshie District Courts, and Madina District Court A and B, in addition to the High Court in Nsawam.

    “It is envisaged that the court shift system when implemented will reduce the backlog cases in the specified courts, improve accessibility to justice for citizens by offering flexible court hours that accommodate diverse schedules and enhance the overall effectiveness of the judicial system.”

    The choice to introduce the shift system is motivated by the necessity to confront significant case backlogs identified during a nationwide review of court dockets.

    Certain courts were discovered to be grappling with an excessive number of pending cases, with figures surpassing 600 in some instances.

    The implementation of this shift system seeks to streamline court proceedings and relieve the strain on judicial resources.

    The ultimate goal is to enhance the efficiency and accessibility of justice delivery.

  • Don’t allow Police prosecutors to handle cases worth over GHC500k – Chief Justice tells judges

    Don’t allow Police prosecutors to handle cases worth over GHC500k – Chief Justice tells judges

    Police prosecutors can no longer handle cases that exceed GHC500,000 following a directive by Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkornoo, to all judges.

    The Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkornoo issued the directive in response to a letter from the Attorney-General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, indicating that police prosecutors are now restricted from prosecuting cases worth any amount exceeding the aforementioned.

    “I write with reference to the attached letter from the Office of the Attorney-General and Ministry of Justice dated 7th February 2024 on the above-mentioned subject.”

    “The Attorney-General is by the said letter notifying the Service that, Police Prosecutors have been directed to prosecute cases with monetary value not exceeding the amount of GH4500,000.00.

    Any case with a monetary value above this limit will now be referred to the Office of the Attorney-General for study and advice.

    Concerned about instances where lower court judges were unaware of these limits, the Director of Public Prosecutions informed the Attorney-General, prompting the issuance of this directive to ensure compliance among judges.

    Following this directive, the Chief Justice duly informed judges to take note and strictly adhere to it.

  • Legal ethics for law students must include dress code – Chief Justice

    Legal ethics for law students must include dress code – Chief Justice

    Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkornoo, has endorsed the inclusion of legal ethics studies in law school curricula, emphasizing its role in fostering appropriate discipline within the legal profession.

    Speaking at a public lecture and the launch of the Gertrude Torkornoo Moot Court Competition at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) Law School, she suggested that along with legal ethics, guidance on dress codes and behavioral norms for legal practitioners should be incorporated.

    “I am aware that there is brisk consideration for the incorporation of the study of legal ethics within the curriculum of law faculties.

    “Allow me to suggest that to increase the ethical requirement for propriety, this curriculum be accompanied with directions on dress code and other codes on behaviour that necessarily follow the life of a legal practitioner.”

    The public lecture, themed “Ethics, Compliance, and Accountability: A Holistic Approach to Adjudication,” marked the commencement of the Gertrude S. Torkornoo Moot Court Competition—a national contest bringing together law students from various faculties across Ghana. The competition aims to enhance students’ advocacy and litigation skills, preparing them for future legal careers.

    Chief Justice Torkornoo discussed the significance of ethics in adjudication, successful lawyering, and the holistic approach to ethics by adjudicators.

    Emphasizing the role of discipline as an ethical value, she stated that disciplined behavior, when ingrained as a cultural norm, leads to excellence in professional practice.

    The Chief Justice underscored the importance of compliance with ethical values in successful lawyering, citing the constitution, statutes, and professional codes of conduct as the foundations of the justice sector.

    She highlighted independent thinking, competence, diligence, and integrity as essential skills for legal professionals in dissecting facts and applying legal principles.

    ”Compliance with ethical values is, therefore, not an inconvenient call that disturbs the smooth catwalk to pomp of lawyering, but a gentle set of directional sign posts that lead the legal professional to the standards of intellectual delivery required for justice to be adequately served to citizens to whom belong the right of justice.”

    Addressing the relationship between ethics and successful lawyering, Chief Justice Torkornoo emphasized that proficiency in law arises not only from legal knowledge but also from the exercise of adept skills and character. She further commended GIMPA School of Law for introducing the Moot Court Competition as an enriching extracurricular activity, providing a unique platform for students to learn and apply legal skills and values.