The Spokesperson of the National Chief Imam, Sheikh Armiyawo Shaibu, voiced concerns about external influences impacting critical national decisions, particularly in the wake of the recent passage of the anti-LGBTQ+ bill in Parliament.
Sheikh Shaibu asserted that succumbing to such external pressure would compromise the very essence of Ghana’s independence, coincidentally marking its 67th year on March 6.
Sheikh Shaibu, highlighting the widespread objection to LGBTQ+ activities among Ghanaians, emphasised the collective rejection of these practices as a nation grounded in strength, might, and deep spirituality.
He questioned the authenticity of Ghana’s independence, expressing concern that external forces challenge the nation’s autonomy in decision-making.
“In my view, it makes complete nonsense of our independence. Ghana will be marking its 67th year of independence on the 6th of March as a nation. 67 years!”
The United States’ warning of dire economic implications following the enactment of the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill added a layer of complexity to the situation.
Sheikh Shaibu, however, stood firm, underlining the religious foundation of the country as evident in the constitution, national anthem, and pledge—all referencing the Almighty God.
“And majority of the people in our country see these gay and lesbian activities as something opprobrious that we must all reject with all the strength and the might and the spirit as a nation that has a deep sense of God.”
As Ghana grapples with the divisive Anti-LGBTQ+ bill, Sheikh Shaibu urged citizens to reflect on the implications of external pressure on decision-making.
“Now it is not even about our concerns, feelings, and beliefs as citizens of this country, but because of a certain pressure from outside which didn’t begin today is trying to influence us. This shows that as a nation we are not truly independent as we claim and it must be a worry for every citizen in this country.”
He stressed that true independence should empower Ghana to shape its destiny without undue influence from external sources.
The Finance Ministry’s call for the President to engage stakeholders, including faith-based organisations, and its suggestion to involve conservative countries like Arab nations and China, further underscored the geopolitical implications of the bill.
Meanwhile, human rights groups in Ghana have threatened legal action, with two lawsuits already before the Supreme Court, prompting President Akufo-Addo to await the court’s decision before taking action on the bill.
The unfolding events raise critical questions about Ghana’s independence and its ability to navigate internal issues without succumbing to external pressures.