Former Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Godfred Yeboah Dame, has penned down a letter to legal practitioner Thaddeus Sory.
The letter is a response to what he claims a pattern of professional attacks and personal attacks from the legal practitioner.
Mr Dame has described Sory’s criticisms as an unhealthy and one that needs to be checked.
According to Dame, utterances by Sory “is a clear contravention of the rules of professional conduct and etiquette governing the legal profession, coming from one with considerable standing at the Bar”.
Earlier, Thaddeus Sory who is a lawyer for one of the petitioners seeking the removal of the Chief Justice, Getrude Torkornoo, published an article which gained attention.
On Friday, May 23, Sory shared a post on Facebook where many have viewed as a jab to Godfred Dame, although he didn’t mention him (Dame)directly.
He claimed that the individual in question lacked the capacity to attack him (Sory) personally.
He wrote,” I understand the cry baby has responded somewhere and very incongruously. No direct response. Incongruous cacophony. We need some popcorn for Fridays. No Netflix. I will serialism. See you soon”.
Sory’s post comes after Dame’s engagement with the media where he allegedly accused the National Democratic Congress (NDC) of driving an agenda for the removal of the Chief Justice, especially through the petitioners’ lawyers Oliver Barker-Vormawor, Thaddeus Sory and Tsatsu Tsikata.
Central to Mr Dame’s response was a reflection on his achievements as A-G, where he defended himself against assertions by Thaddeus Sory.
“Your predilection to comment on the slightest thing I do or say is not lost on the public. For some time now, you have been expending enormous energy, time and resources to launch public attacks on me in relation to my work.
“I live in your mind rent free. Indeed, your obsession with Godfred Dame is bewildering and needs healing,” he noted.
He countered Sory’s claim that he Dame claimed he had undefeated record in court.
“You state at paragraph 22, that, I “wear [my] record of never losing a case as a badge of honour”, in my tenure as Attorney-General. You quipped “what has changed?”
“Clearly, you are wrong. The allegation is mischievous and only continues a series of falsehoods often produced by lawyers of the NDC ilk to feed their foot soldiers,” he wrote.
Meanwhile, Dame has committed to avoiding any future engagement with Sory, adding “This, I hope, will be my only and ever response to you… However, knowing your obsession with me, I am sure it will draw more abuse from you,” ending with the parting shot”.
Read Godfred Dame’s full text below:
Greetings Thaddeus Sory, Esq.,
Your predilection to comment on the slightest thing I do or say is not lost on the public. For some time now, you have been expending enormous energy, time and resources to launch public attacks on me in relation to my work. I live in your mind rent free. Indeed, your obsession with Godfred Dame is bewildering and needs healing.
The abusive and offensive language you employ is deplored by most decent minded legal practitioners, and in clear contravention of the rules of professional conduct and etiquette governing the legal profession, coming from one with considerable standing at the Bar. I leave the authorities that regulate the legal profession and are responsible for upholding standards of professional conduct to judge. I have always ignored the write-ups you have produced about me
For the first time, however, and hopefully it will be the last, I am compelled to correct a few things you have got fundamentally wrong. I will ignore the rest of the falsehood in your write-up as part of the vile propaganda you regularly engage in against me, which all can see through.
You state at paragraph 22, that, I “wear [my] record of never losing a case as a badge of honour”, in my tenure as Attorney-General. You quipped “what has changed?”
Clearly, you are wrong. The allegation is mischievous and only continues a series of falsehoods often produced by lawyers of the NDC ilk to feed their foot soldiers. The record will show that as Attorney-General, I publicly touted some significant losses suffered by my office in very important matters in the Superior Courts of Judicature as a symbol of judicial independence in Ghana. On 11th September, 2023, at the Annual Bar Conference in Cape Coast, I had this to say:
“When I look back at certain cases whose outcomes I consider undesirable, regardless of my own views on the questions being judged in them, I come to the conclusion that, what we have in this country is a fiercely independent Judiciary in which all of us should take pride that, an aggrieved citizen can go to a court of law and challenge anyone, including decisions of the President and Parliament, and be confident that the Court will give a decision without fear or favour. I refer to recent decisions of the Supreme Court in the Ghana Centre for Democratic Development & 8 others vrs. The Attorney-General, Ezuame Mannan vrs. The Attorney-General and vrs. The Attorney-General.
Again, on 9th September, 2024, at the Bar Conference in Kumasi, I proudly exhibited some of my losses.
“I can confidently say that I have been an Attorney-General in whose tenure the Judiciary has demonstrated complete independence and strength through decisions it gives in cases involving the State. In both civil and criminal jurisdictions, my Office has had many victories, but we have also experienced some adverse decisions. Examples are the decisions of the Supreme Court in Ghana Centre for Democratic Development & 8 others vrs. The Attorney-General (the removal of former Auditor-General, Mr. Dormelovo from office), Appiagyei Atuah vrs. The Attorney-General (the Imposition of Restrictions in Covid-19 case) and Ezuame Mannan vrs. the Attorney-General and the Speaker of Parliament (the Narcotics Control Commission Law case).
You would notice that most of these defeats were by a unanimous verdict of the Supreme Court. I will add to my losses the controversial 2-1 majority decision of the Court of Appeal in Republic vrs. Cassiel Ato Forson & 2 Others, whose correctness the current Attorney-General prevented the Supreme Court from assessing, by swiftly filing a notice of withdrawal when the NDC assumed power in January, 2025.
I note that in life, when one enjoys tremendous success in a field of endeavour or an office, there is the tendency to assume that one experienced no failure on any occasion. You and the NDC may thus be forgiven to think that I “never lost a case as Attorney-General”.
You state at paragraph 23 of your write-up that you “once asked: how did your [referring to me] legal acumen suddenly improve just because you became Attorney-General?”
Oh Thaddeus! Doth ye have such short memory? Have you forgotten that in the only full trial of a case you and I happened to be on opposing sides between 2007 and 2009 when you were at Dery & Co., you lost miserably (potoo, as we say in Ghanaian parlance) when judgment was delivered by Ofosu-Quartey J. in May, 2009? Unperturbed, you led your clients to pursue an appeal at the Court of Appeal and lost again, in a judgment delivered on 25th July, 2013. Was I the Attorney-General in those years?
A person who cursorily reads your write-up will be permitted to infer that you suffer pangs of jealousy. This, I cannot help. I can only urge you not to be quick to boast of your “legal acumen”, as you put it, or soil the hard-earned reputation of your fellow lawyers.
When as Deputy Attorney-General, I valiantly conducted many dangerous cases much to the chagrin of the NDC, including a recovery of part of the Woyome ill-gotten cash, was I the Attorney-General? For your reminder, part of the Woyome cash (the “balance” as we say in Ghana) is outstanding. Use your “legal acumen” to assist the current Attorney-General to recover with interest, instead of expending time and energy in coming to the Supreme Court every day to monitor how cases affecting Torkonoo CJ are going, even when you are not counsel in it.
Fortunately, the “legal acumen” you claimed I found when I was appointed Attorney-General was not limited to the domestic territories of Ghana. I deployed same to the successful defence of Ghana’s interests in many international arbitration cases and foreign courts, saving the nation billions of United States Dollars. In point of fact, in my tenure as Attorney-General, Ghana emerged victorious in all the international arbitrations my humble self and my able deputies led the Office to conduct without the aid of foreign counsel. In tribute to Ghana’s legal talent, I say that in the last international arbitration conducted solely by myself and my colleague Deputy Attorneys-General, which culminated in an award delivered on 18th November, 2024, Ghana’s case was roundly upheld with costs of about US$2.2 Million in her favour.
In all humility, I say, as a testament to the strength of Ghana’s judicial system, that the record of the consistent success I enjoyed in the courts in innumerable high-profile cases I conducted between 2003 and 2007 (as a relatively junior lawyer) and between 2009 and 2017 ( when I was not the Attorney-General but a lawyer who was a member of the opposition), is there for all to verify. It is this independence of Ghana’s judiciary that I see is threatened by recent happenings in Ghana, and which I seek to protect. You and the NDC’s desperation to churn out a false narrative now will not change the situation.
I have never said that you have not represented NPP clients. I am aware of your association with NPP clients particularly, when you were a junior to Mr. Ambrose Dery in Dery & Co. The irrefutable point I make now is that Mr. Tsikata was President Mahama’s lawyer in the last election petition in 2020. You are the current Speaker of Parliament’s lawyer and double as lawyer for a person who is aggrieved by judgments delivered by the Chief Justice against him in his attempt to recover some gargantuan money from Ecobank. If you do not find it “incongruous” that the lawyers of the heads of two arms of government have teamed up to remove the lady Chief Justice of the Republic from office, I cannot fault you.
You assert your duty to “represent anyone who retains” you. Do I not owe the same duty?
This, I hope will be my only and ever response to you. I will continue to ignore all your provocative comments. However, knowing your obsession with me, I am sure it will draw more abuse from you.
As they say, “when Godfred Dame coughs, the whole NDC catches a cold”.
24th May, 2025
Godfred Yeboah Dame,
Dame & Partners,
Accra.
