Former Majority Leader in Parliament, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, has criticized President John Dramani Mahama for introducing the Operation Recover All Loots (ORAL) committee, describing it as a harmful precedent.
Speaking on Nhyira FM’s ‘Kuro Yi Mu Nsem’ program, host Nana Kwadwo Jantuah inquired about his assessment of Mahama’s administration so far.
In response, the former Minister for Parliamentary Affairs remarked, “It is important they start right so they can end well. He’s not done too badly but there are a few things that need to be discussed. An example is the ORAL. The ORAL is a dangerous precedent he set for the country.”
He elaborated that any fair evaluation of a government requires at least 100 days in office, stating, “To do a proper assessment of every government, you have to wait for the first 100 days. It’s too early to rate Mahama but I have my reservations about a few things.”
Nonetheless, Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu argued that at the time the ORAL Committee was constituted, Mahama lacked the legal authority to do so.
“The Operation Recover All Loots was set even when he wasn’t President yet. He was the President-elect and hadn’t been sworn in. So executive authority was not in his hands. He didn’t have that power to establish the ORAL team,” he asserted.
The former Suame legislator pointed out that looting is a criminal act and that only a court has the jurisdiction to determine whether an individual is guilty of such an offense.
“What does it mean to loot?” he asked. “To loot means a person has stolen something which isn’t theirs. So looting is a criminal offense. And before we establish someone has looted something, a court of competent jurisdiction needs to determine whether you have looted.”
He further stated, “The constitution guarantees the right to own property individually or as a collective. If you can’t establish the individual has not created their own wealth but looted, then it is a serious accusation.”
Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu maintains that forming the ORAL team was unnecessary and argues that labeling individuals as looters without legal proof amounts to defamation.