Tag: Met police

  • Met Police Chief calls for increased legal protection for officers after gun revolt

    Met Police Chief calls for increased legal protection for officers after gun revolt

    The leader of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Mark Rowley, wants officers to have more legal protection. This is because armed police officers have rebelled, and now there is a possibility that the army might take their place.

    Soldiers are ready to help the police because over 100 police officers stopped carrying guns after one of their colleagues was charged with murder.

    The head of the police force is happy about a review of the situation done by the Home Secretary, Suella Braverman. In a letter to her, the commissioner said, “Let the police do their job. ”

    Over 100 officers have given permission to carry guns, leading Scotland Yard to ask the military for help.

    A problem arose when a police officer, who remains unidentified, was accused of murder for shooting and killing Chris Kaba, a 24-year-old who was not armed. This incident occurred in September of last year in Streatham Hill, located in south London.

    Mrs Braverman said she wanted to check that armed officers feel sure about doing their job.
    Sir Mark has recommended making some changes to how self-defense is understood in cases where the police have done something wrong. He also suggested using a higher standard of proof in investigations into unlawful killings and making it easier for the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) to start an investigation.

    He stated in the letter: ‘In the UK, we are proud to enforce laws with the agreement of the public, following the principles of responsibility, openness, and unbiased examination. ‘

    We need a system that both officers and communities trust and believe in.

    ‘When bad things happen, people want us to be held to very high standards. ’

    I have clearly stated this in every aspect of police work, and the use of force should be no different.

    The system that determines if officers did something wrong should be honest and fair. Decisions should be made quickly and fairly, without any fear or special treatment.

    We have to look at how the Independent Office for Police Conduct and the Crown Prosecution Service are held accountable. We should review their policies and practices, especially when it comes to deciding whether to investigate police actions in using force and being involved in chases.

    The announcement of the review today is something we are happy about.

    I have been talking to the public lately about the importance of letting the police do their job.

    ‘We are fully dedicated to bringing about change in the Met and we are making good progress, but this progress is being challenged by a system that is not designed to support officers in their success. ’

    Sir Mark is asking for rules about how long investigations by the IOPC (Independent Office for Police Conduct) and CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) should take. He wants to make sure that officers who are being investigated don’t suffer too much.

    He also said that more specific details about incidents should be shared with the public to make sure people trust the police.

    The high-ranking officer said that the firearms officers are worried that even if they follow the tactics and training they have been given, they will have to deal with long and complicated legal processes for many years. This will affect their own well-being and also that of their family.

    Previous reviews were announced, but they did not bring about any change.

    ‘Choosing to carry a gun is optional. ‘ We depend on brave officers who are ready to face danger every day to keep us safe from dangerous criminals, like terrorists.

    Police officers must have adequate legal protection so that they can effectively perform their duties and ensure public safety. They also need to feel confident that this protection will be consistently applied without any bias or fear.
    Rishi Sunak supported the review conducted by the Home Secretary, explaining that armed police officers should have clear information about their legal powers.

    The Prime Minister was talking to TV and radio staff members while visiting a community center in Hertfordshire. He said that our police officers who use guns have a really tough job.

    They are making quick decisions that can save our lives, and we should be thankful and appreciate their bravery.

    It is crucial for them to use these legal powers with clear understanding and complete sureness, particularly because they are dealing with deadly force.

    That’s why the Home Secretary wants her department to review the guidance that the officers are following, to make sure it is strong and that both the officers and the public trust it.

    ‘Of course, I cannot make guesses about cases that are still happening, but that is exactly what we are doing. ’

    The police have asked for help from the military to fight against terrorism, and the Ministry of Defence has agreed to provide that help if it is necessary.

    This is a backup plan that would only be used in certain situations when there is no suitable police response available.

    The military will not be used to do regular police work. We will continuously check if we still need the support.

    The Ministry of Defence has agreed to help the Metropolitan Police with counter-terrorism efforts if they need it.

    The Home Secretary said: ‘We rely on our courageous police officers with guns to keep us safe from the most dangerous and violent people in our society. ‘

    They have to make very quick decisions in order to keep the public safe, even when they are under a lot of pressure.

    They shouldn’t be afraid of facing legal consequences for doing their job. I fully support the officers who risk their lives to keep us safe, and I will do everything I can to help them.

    A police officer from the Metropolitan Police went to court on Thursday because someone named Mr. Kaba died after getting shot through a car windshield.

    The police officer who is accused of killing someone is given the name NX121 because a judge ordered that their true identity should not be revealed.

  • Two held on suspicion of murder after baby was found dead in east London

    Two held on suspicion of murder after baby was found dead in east London

    The police have apprehended a man and a woman suspected of being involved in the death of a baby.The baby was found dead in a house in east London. At approximately 7:40pm on Tuesday, authorities came across something distressing at a residence located in the Harold Hill region of Havering.Upon receiving alerts suggesting the child’s safety was at risk, the police promptly headed to Mimosa Close.

    The Met Police is looking into a death that they did not expect to happen.

    Pictures were taken of forensic officers from the Metropolitan Police’s crime scene investigation team at the property.

    There is a line made to keep people away, and some police officers can be seen watching nearby. The police took a man and a woman into custody because they think they may have killed the baby.

    The authorities are continuously keeping them detained.

    A spokesperson from the Metropolitan Police said that on Tuesday, August 22 at around 7:40 PM, the police were called to a house in Mimosa Close, Havering because there were worries about the safety and health of a baby.

    The police came. They found a baby’s body. Right now, authorities are looking into the death as a surprise and are trying to figure out what happened.

    There is still something happening at the address. Investigators are still looking into the situation.

    A man and a woman have been arrested for possibly causing this incident’s death. They are still being held by the authorities.

  • Three men detained for kidnapping a 13-year-old girl

    Three men detained for kidnapping a 13-year-old girl

    Three guys have been detained for kidnapping while a teenage girl has vanished from a party 175 miles from her home.

    After travelling from Barnsley to London for a party, police worry that Carmelle Hepi may be with a “older man.”

    The adolescent left for London over the weekend to attend a party, and on Sunday night she disappeared.

    Just after midnight, her frightened family notified South Yorkshire Police of her disappearance, and they forwarded the information to the Met Police.

    Since then, three men, all aged in their 20s, have been arrested on suspicion of kidnap and remain in custody.

    The teenager travelled from Barnsley Station, onto Sheffield and then down to London Kings Cross St Pancras, arriving shortly after 6pm on Saturday.

    Latest London news

    Carmelle is believed to have attended a birthday party in Peckham with a ‘small gathering of teenagers’ at around 10pm.

    Yorkshire police appeal to find 13yr old girl believed to be in London
    Carmelle has been missing since Sunday (Picture: Met Police)
    Yorkshire police appeal to find 13yr old girl believed to be in London
    Police have released CCTV of her entering Primark in Croydon (Picture: Met Police)
    Yorkshire police appeal to find 13yr old girl believed to be in London
    She was in the store for 20 minutes before leaving (Picture: Met Police)

    Around an hour later, the Met Police said she left with another group of people in a car.

    She is also believed to have attended addresses in Croydon, Lewisham, and Purfleet in Essex.

    Officers believe that she may be in the company of an older male.

    Footage has also been released from the same day showing her entering the Primark in High Street, Croydon at around 4.45 pm, before leaving 20 minutes later.

    It shows her in the pink and white jacket she may be wearing now.

    Officers are said to be in regular contact with Carmelle’s family in Barnsley and have spoken to the people who were at the party.

    The senior investigating officer is Detective Chief Inspector Chris Wood, who said: ‘Carmelle, I want you to know that you are not in any trouble whatsoever.

    ‘Our one and only focus is making sure that you are safe and well.

    Yorkshire police appeal to find 13yr old girl believed to be in London
    Officers fear she may be with an ‘older man’ they have said (Picture: Met Police)

    ‘Please call 999 and speak to us, or go to a police station, and we will get you back home safely.

    ‘Your family are desperately worried about you and while we’re supporting them as best we can, they need to know that you’re OK and to come home. They cannot rest until you’re back with them.

    DCI Wood added: ‘My team are working round the clock, supported by our colleagues at South Yorkshire Police and local officers.

    ‘As well as the arrests made, we have spoken to multiple people, searched a number of addresses and officers are conducting extensive CCTV enquiries, along with various other leads we are pursuing.

    ‘Members of the public can help us locate Carmelle. If you have seen Carmelle, or you know her and have information about where she is or has been, it is imperative that you contact us.

    ‘It doesn’t matter if you’re a friend who has heard or seen something in passing – you won’t be in trouble. What matters is that you contact as you could have significant information to help us find a missing teenage girl.’

  • Harry fails in second Home Office legal case

    Harry fails in second Home Office legal case

    The legal dispute between Prince Harry and the Home Office about his safety while in the UK has been resolved.

    Nearly two years ago, the Duke of Sussex filed a petition for judicial review in the High Court after his right to armed security was restricted after he resigned from his royal duties.

    He objected to the judgement that he shouldn’t even be able to pay for it privately.

    At a hearing earlier this month, a judge was asked by his lawyers to allow him to bring a case over the decisions.

    FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, leaves the High Court in London, Britain March 27, 2023. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls//File Photo
    Harry leaving the High Court in London earlier this year (Picture: Reuters)

    But the High Court have today ruled that the prince could not also seek a judicial review over whether to let him pay for the specialist police officers out of his own pocket.

    The Home Office said the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) considered it was ‘not appropriate’ for wealthy people to ‘buy’ protective security, which might include armed officers, when it had decided that ‘the public interest does not warrant’ someone receiving such protection on a publicly-funded basis.

    Lawyers for the Met Police said Ravec had been ‘reasonable’ in finding ‘it is wrong for a policing body to place officers in harm’s way upon payment of a fee by a private individual’.

    Mr Justice Chamberlain refused Harry permission to bring the second challenge, rejecting on a number of grounds.

    The court was told at the earlier hearing that his latest legal challenge was related to an earlier claim he brought against the Home Office after he was told he would no longer be given the ‘same degree’ of personal protective security when visiting the UK.

    A full hearing in that challenge, which also focuses on Ravec’s decision-making and for which Harry was given the go-ahead last summer, is yet to be held.

    Tuesday’s ruling comes amid an ongoing High Court trial involving the duke, in which he is bringing a contested claim against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) over allegations of unlawful information gathering.

    Harry is also waiting for rulings over whether similar cases against publishers Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) and News Group Newspapers (NGN) can go ahead.

    A judgment is also expected in the duke’s libel claim against ANL – publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday – over an article on his case against the Home Office.

  • Metropolitan police, David Carrick pleads guilty to 24 rape charges in a string of sex crimes

    Metropolitan police, David Carrick pleads guilty to 24 rape charges in a string of sex crimes

    David Carrick, also known as “B*d Dave” to his workmates, appeared Monday at London’s Southwark Crown Court and entered guilty pleas. He worked for the parliamentary and diplomatic command of the Met Police.

    A serving member of the Metropolitan Police has admitted guilt to a number of sexual offenses, including 24 counts of rape.

    PC David Carrick, also known as “B*d Dave” to his coworkers, entered guilty pleas on Monday at London’s Southwark Crown Court.

    The 48-year-old was accused of 49 offenses committed over an 18-year period against 12 women.

    They included the rape of nine different women, but some of the charges are multiple incident counts, meaning they relate to more than 80 sexual offences, including at least 48 rapes.

    Carrick served with the army before he joined the Met Police in August 2001 and worked with the force’s parliamentary and diplomatic command from 2009.

    The armed officer’s role included policing parliamentary, government and diplomatic premises.

    He was only suspended after a second rape complaint was made against him in October 2021.

    Carrick met some of his victims through online dating sites, such as Tinder and Badoo, or on social occasions – and used his position as a police officer to gain their trust.

    He admitted raping women on multiple occasions over months or years, with many of those attacks involving violence that would have left them physically injured.

    Officer whipped and urinated on victims

    Some victims were locked in a small cupboard under the stairs in his Hertfordshire home for hours without food or forced to clean his house naked.

    Carrick whipped one woman with a belt, urinated on some of his victims, and told them when they could eat and sleep.

    He called women “fat and lazy” or his “slave” as he controlled them financially, isolated them from friends and family, and forbade them from speaking with other men or even their own children.

    Carrick denied a further count of rape relating to a 13th woman, whose allegation triggered the investigation, and the Crown Prosecution Service decided it was not in the public interest to proceed to trial on the charge.

    The court heard that over drinks in a pub in September 2020, Carrick told her he was a firearms officer nicknamed “B*****d Dave”, showed her his warrant card and boasted of meeting famous people, including then-prime minister Boris Johnson, in the course of his work.

    Victims ‘intimidated and humiliated’

    Detective Chief Inspector Iain Moor, the senior investigating officer, said Carrick “thrived on humiliating his victims and cleverly used his professional position to intimate there was no point in them trying to seek help because they would never be believed”.

    “The coercive nature of his offending undermined his victims in the most destructive way,” he added.

    Mr Moor described the false imprisonment charges as “shocking”, adding: “Carrick forced his victim into a small under-stairs cupboard at his home address where they stayed intimidated and humiliated until he chose when they could come out. I have seen bigger dog crates.

    “It is unbelievable to think these offences could have been committed by a serving police officer.

    “The offending was absolutely abhorrent and I’m disgusted by it. I have a lot of pride and respect in the police service and I’m proud to be a policeman.”

    Met Police knew of previous allegations

    Following his guilty pleas, the Met Police confirmed Carrick “had come to the attention of the Met and other forces on nine occasions prior to October 2021” but had not been charged over those allegations against him.

    They included allegations of rape, domestic violence, and harassment between 2000 and 2021.

    Carrick, from Stevenage in Hertfordshire, was also the subject of five complaints from the public while serving with the Met Police, the force said.

    The Met said Carrick was vetted in 2001 and again in 2017, and passed on both occasions.

    Met Police ‘truly sorry’

    Assistant Commissioner Barbara Gray, the Met’s lead for professionalism, said Carrick’s offending was “unprecedented in policing” and apologised to his victims for failing to remove him from the force.

    “We should have spotted his pattern of abusive behaviour and because we didn’t, we missed opportunities to remove him from the organisation,” she said.

    “We are truly sorry that being able to continue to use his role as a police officer may have prolonged the suffering of his victims.”

    A misconduct hearing is due to be heard in Carrick’s absence on Tuesday.

    Judge Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said she will sentence Carrick over two days from 6 February.

    Source: Skynews.com