Tag: Iran

  • How things went down in the Situation Room during attack on US military base

    America’s top diplomat on Iran was only a few minutes into a speech on Tuesday afternoon when he was handed an urgent note.

    Brian Hook, the special representative for Iran, was in Los Angeles to talk about US policy toward Iran. But by the time he stepped to the podium, he was already more than an hour late, having spent much of the day on a secure line speaking to US officials in Washington including his boss, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

    And now, he had to leave.

    “The peoples of Iraq and Lebanon and Iran, they want their country back,” Hook said. “And they are tired of Iran being unable to stay within its own borders. Thank you.”

    With that, Hook walked briskly off stage. America’s defense apparatus was spinning into action.

    Read:Donald Trump confirms Islamic State leader killed by US military

    Minutes earlier, US intelligence satellites had picked up signs of a heat signature from Iran, suggesting the country had just launched short range ballistic missiles. The US knew an impending attack was likely, thanks to a tip from the Iraqi government, which had been told by the Iranians an attack was coming and which bases to avoid.

    Still, using information from the satellites and US aircraft in the region — which had intercepted Iranian communications — US intelligence analysts quickly determined that two bases in Iraq were the targets, al-Asad and Erbil. Within minutes, US troops stationed there were warned. They’d already been on high alert and sought safety in bunkers, according to a source familiar.

    Troops took short-term cover the day before out of a concern of a possible attack. Now, the threat was imminent, and the troops were told of incoming missiles.

    At 7:30 p.m. ET, the official announcement went out: Iran had launched more than a dozen ballistic missiles against US military and coalition forces in Iraq.

    Just five days after killing Iran’s top military leader, Qassem Soleimani, in a drone strike in Baghdad, this was the moment that the Trump administration had been preparing for — a direct retaliatory attack from Iran.

    News of the missile strike came as the administration had spent days stuck in a chaotic series of self-inflicted wounds. First, Trump had threatened to target Iranian cultural sites. Then there was the shocking letter announcing the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq that the Pentagon had to walk back as “a mistake.”

    It all raised questions about the administration’s handling of the situation, and even had some Republican allies of the President privately expressing concern about whether the administration was truly prepared to deal with the events it had unleashed with the Soleimani strike.

    The moment wasn’t lost on Trump’s top aides, who convened in the basement Situation Room knowing that the ensuing hours could redeem a chaotic several days — or cement the impression of a rudderless ship.

    Read:US to enlist military allies in Gulf and Yemen waters

    On Tuesday evening, aides watched as the situation went from the potential for dramatic conflict to one that seemed to offer Trump a new opportunity to deescalate. Bolstered by incoming messages from Iran sent through back-channels, Trump’s aides realized the damage would be limited.

    “Iran appears to be standing down, which is a good thing for all parties concerned and a very good thing for the world,” Trump said on Wednesday morning.

    The following account of the events that unfolded over the past are based on interviews with dozens of Trump administration officials, foreign diplomats, as well as staffers and top lawmakers on the Hill.

    Scramble to inform
    Within an hour of the strikes, leaders on Capitol Hill were being briefed. In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi was discussing the situation in Iran with a group of top Democrats when she was handed a note with news of a rocket attack on a US military base in Iraq. Among those present was Rep. Dan Kildee, who told CNN that Pelosi paused the discussion to alert members of the situation. “Pray,” Pelosi told members, according to Rep. Debbie Dingel.
    Not long after, Pelosi got on the phone with Vice President Mike Pence, who briefed her on the Iranian attacks. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also received a call from Pence around the same time and was briefed on the attack.

    Meanwhile, GOP leaders were getting briefed directly by the President.

    At the Pentagon, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper met with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and senior defense officials as soon as he got word of the attack. Less than an hour after news broke of the Iranian strike, Esper’s office reached out to Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul al-Mahdi, who just days earlier had criticized the US drone strike on Soleimani as a “flagrant violation of the conditions for the presence of the American forces in Iraq.”

    At first Esper’s team couldn’t get through. It was around 3 a.m. in Baghdad and the number the Pentagon had for Mahdi’s office wasn’t working, said a source familiar with the outreach. They contacted the ambassador in Washington at home, who managed to connect the two parties.

    After making a few calls to senior congressional officials, Esper and Army Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, headed to the White House.

    Read:US military confirms terror attack on US base in Kenya

    In the Situation Room
    Just before 7:30 p.m. ET, Esper, Milley and Pompeo all pulled up to the White House within a few minutes of each other. Pompeo arrived first. As he waited for the others, Pompeo turned the light on in the back seat of his Cadillac sedan and was reading from two cellphones. Once the other two cars arrived, Pompeo, Esper and Milley all entered the West Wing together.

    Soon, a group of senior administration officials were gathered in the Situation Room. Along with Pence, Pompeo, Esper and Milley, the group included national security adviser Robert O’Brien, acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire and acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney. White House counsel Pat Cippolone and press secretary Stephanie Grisham were there, while CIA Director Gina Haspel joined by teleconference.

    The first objective was to determine whether any Americans had died in the strike. A senator who spoke with Trump told CNN the President appeared ready to attack Iranian facilities had there been even one American casualty.
    Though it took well into the night to confirm, the early evidence suggested there had not been any American deaths.

    That lack of casualties fed a sense of restraint in the room, according to sources. While some consideration was given to striking back at Iran that night, according to one White House official, the decision was made to hold off until more information came in regarding Iran’s intentions and the conditions on the ground.

    One of the initial reactions in the room was one of surprise that the Iranians fired so few missiles out of their arsenal of thousands, this source said. That, along with the expectation that Iran was always going to strike back, created a sense of calm. Though there was an obvious level of tension given the high stakes, part of the reason the group was more relaxed was the initial view among many administration officials that Iranians were more bent on sending a message than in killing Americans.

    One source pointed to how accurate Iranians have been in the past with its ballistic missiles, such as the attack a Saudi oil refinery, suggesting the attack could have been lethal.

    Within hours of the strike, the President had made clear he wanted to make a public address and began dictating an outline of what it should look like, according to a person familiar. As Trump and his advisers continued to meet in the Situation Room, aides began making urgent plans for an address to the nation, including prepping the Oval Office. The framework of a speech started coming together with aide Stephen Miller at the helm and senior advisers weighing in.

    Over the past few days, top White House officials expressed regret that Trump hadn’t addressed the nation sooner after the strike that killed Soleimani, and worried he’d missed a chance to shape the narrative in his favor. Right after the strike, White House aide and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner was among those pushing Trump to give a speech, but the decision was made to hold off.

    On the Hill, Republican leaders were getting constant updates from the White House, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Armed Services Chairman Sen. James Inhofe. The overall message to the White House from Republicans, according to a number of sources, was one of restraint, and that this was a moment for de-escalation.

    In the end, White House officials said Trump would not emerge on Tuesday night to make an address. The news was met with a collective sigh of relief on the Hill, according to several GOP aides who spoke to CNN.

    Read:Islamic State group chief Baghdadi buried at sea by US military

    Around 9 p.m. ET, Trump began making calls to several GOP lawmakers, including Inhofe, who told reporters Wednesday the President was in a “very, very positive” mood and said he was willing to negotiate with Iran. Inhofe agreed, telling the President this was an opportunity to not just de-escalate but start negotiations.

    At 9:45 p.m. ET, Trump tweeted, “All is well! Missiles launched from Iran at two military bases located in Iraq. Assessment of casualties & damages taking place now. So far, so good! We have the most powerful and well equipped military anywhere in the world, by far! I will be making a statement tomorrow morning.”

    But the night was far from over.

    Iran Back Channels
    Starting late Tuesday night and into Wednesday morning, Iran initiated contact with the administration through at least three back channels, including Switzerland and other countries, according to a senior administration official. The message from Iran was clear: This would be their only response. They would now wait to see what the US would do.
    As part of its response back, the US conveyed that it was fully aware that Iran controls its proxies in the region, including Hezbollah. The source told CNN that Iran tried to “squeak out of it,” saying they are not responsible for those proxies, but the US made clear it didn’t buy that argument.

    By around 1 a.m. ET, the battleground assessment came in, confirming no US casualties. Working through the night without sleep in secure rooms at the White House, national security teams put response options together, including plans to sanction Iran.

    By early Wednesday morning, teams met again with the President, who was given an update on the latest assessment. That’s when Trump made the final decision that the US response would be sanctions, signaling to advisers that the threat of escalation was off the table.

    “They’ve stepped back — now we’ve taken a bit of a step back,” said a senior administration official.

    Trump then began making his own edits on the draft of the speech, as did a handful of other national security advisers including Esper, Pompeo and Milley. As the White House prepared for an 11 a.m. ET address to the nation, advisers kept weighing in on the draft of the President’s remarks, delaying Trump’s address by nearly half an hour.

    As junior staffers and reporters crowded into the red-carpet lined White House foyer, the President’s top national security officials — many wearing their military uniforms — lined up on either side of the podium.

    The wooden doors opened behind them and Trump — silhouetted by late-morning sun — emerged.

    Source: cnn.com

  • At UN, US justifies killing Iranian commander as self-defence

    The United States told the United Nations on Wednesday that the killing of Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani was self-defense and vowed to take additional action “as necessary” in the Middle East to protect U.S. personnel and interests.

    In a letter to the U.N. Security Council, U.S. Ambassador Kelly Craft said the United States also stands “ready to engage without preconditions in serious negotiations with Iran, with the goal of preventing further endangerment of international peace and security or escalation by the Iranian regime.”

    Read:Key Iran General Soleimani killed by US in Iraq

    The killing of Soleimani in Baghdad on Friday was justified under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, wrote Craft in the letter seen by Reuters, adding “the United States is prepared to take additional actions in the region as necessary to continue to protect U.S. personnel and interests.”

    Under Article 51, countries are required to “immediately report” to the 15-member Security Council any measures taken in exercising the right of self-defense. The United States used Article 51 to justify taking action in Syria against Islamic State militants in 2014.

    Read:US government website hacked by Iranian group

    Source: France24

  • Iraq set for conflict, even if US and Iran de-escalate

    Arch-foes Tehran and Washington may be temporarily calling it even after Iranian missiles targeted US forces in Iraq, but analysts predict violent instability will keep blighting Baghdad.

    “Iraq will remain a zone of conflict,” said Randa Slim of the Washington based Middle East Institute.

    Early Wednesday, Iran launched 22 ballistic missiles at bases in Iraq hosting American and other foreign troops, in a calibrated response to the killing of a top Iranian general in a US air strike last week.

    Read:Key Iran General Soleimani killed by US in Iraq

    Iran warned Iraq about the raids shortly before they happened and in their immediate aftermath, foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Tehran had concluded its “proportionate” retaliation.

    US President Donald Trump, too, said Iran “appears to be standing down” and even suggested Tehran and Washington could work towards a nuclear deal while cooperating against jihadists.

    That hinted at a common desire to contain the fallout, but analysts say it would not be enough to spare Iraq.

    “Both sides are so mobilised in Iraq, which has become such symbolic terrain for hitting out at the other,” said Erica Gaston of the New America Foundation.

    Indeed, US troops and even the embassy in Baghdad had been hit by more than a dozen rocket attacks in recent months, which have killed one Iraqi soldier and an American contractor.

    The attacks went unclaimed but the US blamed hardline elements of the Hashed al-Shaabi, an Iraqi military network incorporated into the state but linked to Tehran.

    The strike that killed Iranian general Qasem Soleimani outside Baghdad international airport on Friday also killed his top Iraqi aid and Hashed deputy chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis.

    Read:World War 3: Iran fires missiles at US targets in Iraq: All the latest updates

    ‘Who is the mediator?’

    Just because the US and Iran have struck each other directly does not mean the Hashed would now sit on the sidelines, said Gaston.

    “The Hashed is closer to the tip of the spear,” she said.

    “There isn’t perfect command-and-control in the Hashed, which includes a lot of angry militiamen willing to take revenge on the US,” she added.

    Bolstered by Iran’s attack, the Hashed said Wednesday it would take its own steps avenge Muhandis’s death.

    “That is a promise,” vowed leading member Qais al-Khazali.

    Hours later, two rockets slammed into the Iraqi capital’s Green Zone, the high-security enclave where the US embassy, other foreign missions and some foreign troops are based.

    Hashed factions decided in recent days to unite under a “resistance” coalition to oust US troops from Iraq.

    The spectre of bloodshed was especially worrisome as there is no evident mediator between the parties, said Slim.

    In Lebanon, Iran’s ally Hezbollah has repeatedly clashed with its sworn enemy Israel but the United Nations’ peacekeeping force in the south has usually intervened before the conflict could spin out of control.

    But “who is the mutually liked mediator?” on Iraqi soil, Slim asked.

    Read:Iran attack: Oil prices rise after Iraq missile attacks

    Baghdad has long warned that tensions between Tehran and Washington, which began deteriorating significantly in 2018, would bring devastating conflict to the entire region.

    Iraq’s government had tried to strike a balance between the two countries, both of which have close political and military ties to various elements of Iraq’s elite.

    Balance now ‘impossible’

    But the stunning developments of the last week — from the killing of Soleimani to Wednesday’s pre-dawn strikes — also hugely exacerbated Iraq’s political crisis.

    “It has made a balance impossible and pushed Baghdad squarely into Iran’s camp,” said Toby Dodge, a professor at the London School of Economics.

    Figures like Iraq’s President Barham Saleh, who was seen as one of the most senior officials with close ties to Washington, would likely see their influence dwindle.

    “If last night was the theatre of retaliation, what today brings is political consolidation and domination of the pro-Iran factions,” Toby said.

    Read:Ukrainian passenger plane crashes in Iran

    The Hashed’s political arm, the Fatah bloc, has already seized on anti-US sentiment over the last week to push for a total ouster of foreign troops from Iraqi territory.

    Some 5,200 American troops and hundreds more British, French, Canadian and other forces are based in Iraq to help local forces defeat jihadist sleeper cells.

    On Wednesday, Iraqis’ reactions to Iran’s strikes were much tamer than the anger expressed at the US last week.

    “Baghdad condemns the US publicly, but not Iran,” said Ramzy Mardini, a researcher and Iraq expert.

    While appearing to be pro-Washington in the current climate carries a political cost, some political figures may be busy behind the scenes trying to salvage Iraq’s relationship with the US and restore some stability, however fragile.

    But, Mardini warned, “if the crisis escalates, Baghdad’s space for manoeuvering will shrink. They’ll be forced to pick a side — and it won’t be the US.”

    Source: France24

  • Oil prices rise after Iraq missile attacks

    Oil prices have risen after two bases hosting US troops in Iraq were hit by ballistic missiles.

    Brent crude was up by 1.4% at $69.21 per barrel in the middle of the Asian trade, easing back from earlier gains.

    So-called safe haven assets, like gold and the Japanese yen, also rose on the news.

    At the same time global stock prices were sent lower on concerns over the growing conflict in the Middle East.

    Read:Iran says oil field found with 53 bln barrels of crude

    Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 stock index fell by 1.3%, and Hang Seng in Hong Kong was down 0.8%.

    Iranian state television said the attack was a retaliation for the killing of the country’s top commander Qasem Soleimani.

    The attack happened just hours after the funeral service for Soleimani, who was killed by a US drone strike on Friday.

    His death had raised concerns that the conflict between the US and Iran could escalate further.

    Read:US blames Iran for attacks on Saudi oil facilties

    That could disrupt shipping in the world’s busiest sea route for oil, the Strait of Hormuz. Around a fifth of global oil supply passes through the strait which connects the Gulf with the Arabian Sea.

    The Strait of Hormuz is vital for the main oil exporters in the Gulf region – Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE, and Kuwait – whose economies are built around oil and gas production. Iran also relies heavily on this route for its oil exports.

    Qatar, the world’s biggest producer of liquefied natural gas (LNG), exports nearly all its gas through the strait.

    Read:World War 3: Iran fires missiles at US targets in Iraq: All the latest updates

    After the latest attacks, the US aviation regulator banned American airlines from flying over Iraq, Iran and neighbouring countries. The ban includes the Gulf of Oman and the waters between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said the decision was in response to heightened military activity, and increased political tension in the region.

    Before the latest guidance, the FAA had already prohibited US airlines from flying below 26,000 feet (7,925 metres) over Iraq and from flying over an area of Iranian airspace above the Gulf of Oman since Iran shot down an American drone in June 2019.

    At the same time Singapore Airlines has said that all of its flights would now be diverted from Iranian airspace.

    Source: bbc.com

  • Iran attack: Oil prices rise after Iraq missile attacks

    Oil prices have risen after two bases hosting US troops in Iraq were hit by ballistic missiles.

    Brent crude was up by 1.4% at $69.21 per barrel in the middle of the Asian trade, easing back from earlier gains.

    So-called safe haven assets, like gold and the Japanese yen, also rose on the news.

    At the same time, global stock prices were sent lower on concerns over the growing conflict in the Middle East.

    Oil price surges above $70 a barrel

    Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 stock index fell by 1.3%, and Hang Seng in Hong Kong was down 0.8%.

    Iranian state television said the attack was a retaliation for the killing of the country’s top commander Qasem Soleimani.

    The attack happened just hours after the funeral service for Soleimani, who was killed by a US drone strike on Friday.

    His death had raised concerns that the conflict between the US and Iran could escalate further.

    That could disrupt shipping in the world’s busiest sea route for oil, the Strait of Hormuz. Around a fifth of global oil supply passes through the strait which connects the Gulf with the Arabian Sea.

    The Strait of Hormuz is vital for the main oil exporters in the Gulf region – Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE, and Kuwait – whose economies are built around oil and gas production. Iran also relies heavily on this route for its oil exports.

    Qatar, the world’s biggest producer of liquefied natural gas (LNG), exports nearly all its gas through the strait.

    After the latest attacks, the US aviation regulator banned American airlines from flying over Iraq, Iran and neighbouring countries. The ban includes the Gulf of Oman and the waters between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

    From selling of shirts, watches to owning Oil & Gas Company, the story of Ethel Laurel Akafful

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said the decision was in response to heightened military activity and increased political tension in the region.

    Before the latest guidance, the FAA had already prohibited US airlines from flying below 26,000 feet (7,925 metres) over Iraq and from flying over an area of Iranian airspace above the Gulf of Oman since Iran shot down an American drone in June 2019.

    At the same time, Singapore Airlines has said that all of its flights would now be diverted from Iranian airspace.

    Source: bbc.com

  • Reality Check: How strong is Iran’s military?

    Iran has vowed to retaliate after its most powerful military commander was killed by a US drone strike at Baghdad airport.

    “Severe revenge awaits” those behind the attack on General Qasem Soleimani, said Iran’s Supreme Leader.

    So what do we know about Iran’s military capabilities?

    How big is Iran’s army?

    There are an estimated 523,000 active Iranian personnel in a range of military roles, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a UK-based think tank.

    This includes 350,000 in the regular army, and at least 150,000 in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC).

    There are a further 20,000 service personnel in the IRGC’s naval forces. This group operates a number of armed patrol boats in the Strait of Hormuz, the site of several confrontations involving foreign-flagged tankers in 2019.

    Read:U.S. building coalition after Saudi oil attack, Iran warns against war

    The IRGC also controls the Basij unit, a volunteer force which has helped suppress internal dissent. This unit can potentially mobilise many hundreds of thousands of personnel.

    Members of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp marching during a military parade
    Image captionThe IRGC has its own navy and air force, and oversees Iran’s strategic weapons

    The IRGC was set up 40 years ago to defend the Islamic system in Iran and has become a major military, political and economic force in its own right.

    Despite having fewer troops than the regular army, it is considered the most authoritative military force in Iran.

    What about operations abroad?

    The Quds Force, which was led by General Soleimani, conducts secret operations abroad for the IRGC and reports directly to the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It’s believed to be about 5,000 strong.

    The unit has been deployed to Syria, where it advised military elements loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and armed Shia militias fighting with them. In Iraq, it has supported a Shia-dominated paramilitary force which assisted in the defeat of the Islamic State group.

    Read:US government website hacked by Iranian group

    However, the US says the Quds force has a wider role by providing funding, training, weapons and equipment to organisations that Washington has designated as terrorist groups in the Middle East. These include Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

    An IRGC patrol boat circling the British flagged Stena Impero which was detained by Iran last year
    Image caption:Iran’s IRGC detained the British-flagged tanker the Stena Impero in the Strait of Hormuz in 2019

    Economic problems and sanctions have hampered Iran’s arms imports, which are relatively small compared to those of other countries in the region.

    The value of Iran’s defence imports between 2009 and 2018 was equivalent to just 3.5% of Saudi Arabia’s imports over the same period, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

    Most Iranian imports come from Russia, and the rest from China.

    Does Iran have missiles?

    Yes – Iran’s missile capabilities are a key part of its military prowess, given its relative lack of air power compared with rivals such as Israel and Saudi Arabia.

    Map showing ranges of various Iranian missiles

    A US Defense Department report describes the country’s missile forces as the largest in the Middle East, comprising mainly short-range and medium-range missiles. It also says Iran is testing space technology to allow it to develop inter-continental missiles, which can travel much further.

    However, the long-range missile programme was stalled by Iran as part of its 2015 nuclear deal with foreign countries, according to the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) think tank. But it added that it may have resumed, given the uncertainty surrounding that deal.

    Graphic showing Patriot system

    In any case, many targets in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf would be within range of Iran’s current short and medium-range missiles, and possibly targets in Israel.

    In May last year, the US deployed a Patriot anti-missile defence system to the Middle East as tensions with Iran increased. This is meant to counter ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and advanced aircraft.

    Does Iran have nuclear weapons?

    Iran does not currently have a nuclear weapons programme, and has previously said it does not want one. But it does have many of the elements required and the knowledge to create a military nuclear capability.

    In 2015, the US government under President Obama estimated that Iran only needed two to three months to produce enough nuclear material to make a weapon.

    Read:US blames Iran for attacks on Saudi oil facilties

    The nuclear agreement that year between Tehran and six world powers – from which President Trump withdrew in 2018 – introduced limits and international checks on Iran’s nuclear activities.

    It aimed to make it more difficult and time consuming to develop weapons-grade material.

    Following the killing of General Soleimani by US forces, Iran has said it will not be bound by these restrictions. But it also says it will continue to co-operate with the UN’s nuclear watchdog, the IAEA.

    The remnants of a drone that the US says was supplied by Iran to Houthi rebels
    Image captionThe US has accused Iran of supplying Houthi rebels with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

    Despite years of sanctions, Iran has also been able to develop drone capabilities.

    In Iraq, Iranian drones have been used since 2016 in the fight against IS. Iran has also entered Israeli airspace with armed drones operated from bases in Syria, according to Rusi.

    In June 2019, Iran shot down a US surveillance drone, claiming it had violated Iranian airspace over the Strait of Hormuz.

    The other aspect of Iran’s drone programme is its willingness to sell or transfer its drone technology to its allies and proxies in the region, says Jonathan Marcus, the BBC’s Defence and diplomatic correspondent.

    In 2019, drone and missile attacks damaged two key Saudi oil facilities. Both the US and Saudi Arabia linked these attacks to Iran, although Tehran denied any involvement and pointed to a claim of responsibility by rebels in Yemen.

    Read:Key Iran General Soleimani killed by US in Iraq

    Does Iran have cyber-capabilities?

    Following a major cyber-attack in 2010 on Iranian nuclear facilities, Iran ramped up its own cyber-space capability.

    The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) is believed to have its own cyber-command, working on commercial and military espionage.

    In 2012, US officials blamed Iran for a series of cyber attacks on US banks intended to disrupt traffic to their websites.

    A US military report in 2019 said Iran had also targeted aerospace companies, defence contractors, energy and natural resource companies and telecommunications firms for cyber-espionage operations around the world.

    Also in 2019, Microsoft said a hacker group that “originates from Iran and is linked to the Iranian government” targeted a US presidential campaign and tried to break into the accounts of American government officials.

    Source: bbc.com

  • Soleimani funeral under way in Iran

    Funeral processions to honour Qassem Soleimani, head of Iran’s elite Quds Force who was killed in a US air strike in Baghdad, began in the Iranian city of Ahvaz early on Sunday, hours after his remains arrived from Iraq.

    Soleimani was killed along with Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy commander of the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF, or Hashd al-Shaabi), an Iran-backed umbrella organisation comprising several militias. Several other people were also killed in Friday’s attack.

    The move by the US has drawn worldwide condemnation from leaders and officials who fear that tensions in the region could escalate drastically. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned that “a harsh retaliation is waiting”.

    Key Iran General Soleimani killed by US in Iraq

    On Saturday, US President Donald Trump threatened to hit 52 Iranian sites “very hard” if Iran attacked US citizens or assets.

    Trump warns harsher response if Tehran retaliates

    President Donald Trump warned that the US would hit Iran harder than ever before if Tehran retaliates to the assassination of Soleimani.

    Trump wrote on Twitter: “If they attack again, which I would strongly advise them not to do, we will hit them harder than they have ever been hit before!”

    He followed up with another tweet, saying the US would use its “brand new beautiful” military equipment “without hesitation” if the Iranians retaliate.

    Iran says oil field found with 53 bln barrels of crude

    Ceremonies to honour Soleimani begin in Ahvaz

    Thousands of mourners gathered in Iran’s southwestern city of Ahvaz, where funeral processions to honour Soleimani began on Sunday morning.

    Footage on state television showed people dressed in black in Mollavi Square, holding flags in green, white and red – depicting the blood of “martyrs”, while others held portraits of the slain general.

    Soleimani’s body arrives in Iran

    Soleimani’s remains were returned to Iran on Sunday and flown to the city of Ahvaz in the country’s southwest, the official IRIB news agency reported.

    Source: aljazeera.com

  • Key Iran General Soleimani killed by US in Iraq

    General Qasem Soleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ elite Quds Force, has been killed by US forces in Iraq.

    The Pentagon confirmed he was killed “at the direction of the president”.

    Gen Soleimani was being driven by car at Baghdad airport, alongside local Iran-backed militias, when he was hit by a US air strike.

    Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said “severe revenge awaits the criminals” behind the attack.

    He also announced three days of mourning.

    Gen Soleimani, 62, was a major figure in the Iranian regime. His Quds Force reported directly to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and he was hailed as a heroic national figure.

    But the US has called the commander and the Quds Force terrorists, and holds them responsible for the deaths of hundreds of US personnel.

    US President Donald Trump tweeted an image of the American flag after the news broke.

    Global oil prices meanwhile soared more than 4% in the wake of the strike.

    What happened?

    US media reports say Gen Soleimani and officials from Iran-backed militias were leaving Baghdad airport in two cars when they were hit by a US drone strike near a cargo area.

    The commander had reportedly flown in from Lebanon or Syria. Several missiles reportedly struck the convoy, and at least five people are thought to have died.

    Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said Iraqi militia leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis was among those killed.

    A Pentagon statement said: “At the direction of the President, the US military has taken decisive defensive action to protect US personnel abroad by killing Qasem Soleimani.”

    It added: “This strike was aimed at deterring future Iranian attack plans. The United States will continue to take all necessary action to protect our people and our interests wherever they are around the world.”

    The drone strike comes days after protesters attacked the US embassy in Baghdad, clashing with US forces at the scene. The Pentagon said Gen Soleimani approved the attacks on the embassy.

    How has Iran responded?

    Iran’s Foreign Minister, Javad Zarif, called the attack an “act of international terrorism”, tweeting that the US “bears responsibility for all consequences of its rogue adventurism.”

    Mohsen Rezaei, the former commander of the Revolutionary Guards, said Iran would take “vigorous revenge on America”. A spokesman for the Iranian government said the country’s top security body would meeting in a few hours to discuss the “criminal act of attack”.

    Who was Qasem Soleimani?

    From 1998, Maj Gen Qasem Soleimani led Iran’s Quds Force – an elite unit in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, which handles clandestine operations abroad.

    Iran has acknowledged the role of the Quds Force in the conflicts in Syria, where it has advised forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad and armed thousands of Shia Muslim militiamen fighting alongside them, and in Iraq, where it has backed a Shia-dominated paramilitary force that helped tackle IS.

    These conflicts turned the once-reclusive Gen Soleimani into a something of celebrity in Iran.

    The Trump administration has alleged that the Quds Force is “Iran’s primary mechanism for cultivating and supporting” US-designated terrorist groups across the Middle East – including Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement and Palestinian Islamic Jihad – by providing funding, training, weapons and equipment.

    US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo designated Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and its Quds Force as foreign terrorist organisations in April.

    Source: bbc.com

  • Iran nuclear deal: EU nations warn Tehran over breaches

    Britain, France and Germany have warned Iran against any further breaches of the international nuclear deal signed in 2015, the BBC has learnt.

    In New York on Thursday, the three EU signatories to the deal said they would trigger a special dispute mechanism if there were further violations.

    Iran began breaching its commitments under the deal after the US abandoned it and imposed sanctions last year.

    The UN nuclear watchdog has said Iran is using banned enrichment technology.

    The warning was issued at a meeting with Iranian ministers on the fringes of the UN General Assembly, reports the BBC’s James Landale at the UN General Assembly in New York.

    Read:U.S. building coalition after Saudi oil attack, Iran warns against war

    If the dispute mechanism is triggered, the entire nuclear agreement could collapse and the UN could reinstate sanctions on Iran, which would be applied by all UN member states.

    This would have a devastating impact on the Iranian economy, our correspondent says.

    The deal was first signed in 2015 by the three EU countries, as well as the US, Russia and China.

    Although the agreement allowed Iran to accumulate small amounts of uranium for research, it banned the enrichment of uranium, which is used to make reactor fuel but also nuclear weapons.

    Iran was also required to redesign a heavy-water reactor being built, whose spent fuel would contain plutonium suitable for a bomb, and to allow international inspections.

    In May 2018 President Donald Trump abandoned the deal and reinstated US sanctions.

    When the sanctions were tightened in May this year, Iran stopped abiding by some commitments in the deal.

    In a report seen by Reuters news agency on Thursday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said: “On 25 September 2019, the Agency verified that all of the (centrifuge) cascades already installed in R&D lines 2 and 3… were accumulating, or had been been prepared to accumulate, enriched uranium.”

    Read:Rouhani says Iran favours talks but US must lift sanctions

    Iran denies ever seeking a nuclear weapons capability.

    Earlier this week, French President Emmanuel Macron attempted to broker a meeting between Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and President Trump.

    But Mr Rouhani told delegates at the UN that he refused to meet Mr Trump while punishing US economic sanctions were in place.

    “How can someone believe them when the silent killing of a great nation, and pressure on the lives of 83 million Iranians… are welcomed by American government officials?” he said.

    Source: bbc.com