A Ghanaian citizen, Emmanuella Sarfowaah, has taken legal action against President John Dramani Mahama over his decision to appoint Anthony Kwasi Sarpong as the Acting Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA).
Madam Sarfowaah argues that the appointment, made in a letter dated January 21, 2025, is unconstitutional as it did not follow the proper legal procedures.
She argues that Mr Sarpong still holds an interest in KPMG, where he is listed as a senior partner, and that his appointment to head the GRA raises serious ethical and legal questions. Adding that it is unlawful for the John Mahama to appoint the Commissioner-General in the absence of a Governing Council.
“The Plaintiff says that the 1st Defendant before the letter was, and/or still is (the website of KPMG as of 26th January 2025 still listed the 1st Defendant as such), the Senior Partner of KPMG (a foreign accounting firm practicing in Ghana), with ‘Senior Partner’ being defined by the website of KPMG as the Chief Executive Officer of the firm.”
“The Plaintiff says that the 2nd Defendant, the Ghana Revenue Authority, had no Governing Council as of 21st January 2025. The Plaintiff adds that KPMG has or has had a number of FEE-PAYING contractual working relationships with the 2nd Defendant, with the 1st Defendant as its Senior Partner at least until 21st January 2025 or thereabout,” parts of the writ of summons read.
Mr Sarpong was appointed as Acting Commissioner-General following the resignation of his predecessor, Julie Essiam, on January 20, 2025. His appointment was based on Article 195(1) of the Constitution and Section 13(1) of the Ghana Revenue Act, 2009 (Act 791).
However, according to court documents sighted by the media on February 1, Sarfowaah is contesting the appointment, citing concerns over a potential conflict of interest.
She is seeking an injunction to prevent Sarpong’s continued appointment.
“A perpetual injunction order against the President of the Republic of Ghana restraining him or any person acting by his authority from appointing the 1st Defendant, a former employee of KPMG and/or a person with an interest in KPMG or a person who had an interest in KPMG, as the Acting and/or the Commissioner-General of the GRA.
The court has however, instructed all defendants to file their responses within eight days of receiving the lawsuit as the case progresses.
A Ghanaian citizen, Emmanuella Sarfowaah, has taken legal action against President John Dramani Mahama over his decision to appoint Anthony Kwasi Sarpong as the Acting Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA).
The lawsuit, filed through the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Dominic Akuritinga Ayine, questions whether Mahama had the legal authority to make the appointment.
Sarpong was named Acting Commissioner-General after Julie Essiam resigned from the role on January 20, 2025. His appointment was based on constitutional and legal provisions that govern public service appointments.
However, court documents seen by Citi News on February 1 suggest Sarfowaah is challenging the appointment, raising concerns about a possible conflict of interest.
She claims that Sarpong is still linked to KPMG, where he is listed as a senior partner, and argues that leading the GRA while maintaining ties to the firm could pose ethical and legal issues.
Additionally, she insists that appointing a Commissioner-General without a Governing Council in place goes against the law.
“The Plaintiff says that the 1st Defendant before the letter was, and/or still is (the website of KPMG as of 26th January 2025 still listed the 1st Defendant as such), the Senior Partner of KPMG (a foreign accounting firm practicing in Ghana), with ‘Senior Partner’ being defined by the website of KPMG as the Chief Executive Officer of the firm.
“The Plaintiff says that the 2nd Defendant, the Ghana Revenue Authority, had no Governing Council as of 21st January 2025. The Plaintiff adds that KPMG has or has had a number of FEE-PAYING contractual working relationships with the 2nd Defendant, with the 1st Defendant as its Senior Partner at least until 21st January 2025 or thereabout,” parts of the writ of summons read.
“The 2nd Defendant is a statutory body with a Governing Council that must provide advice before the President of the Republic of Ghana can appoint a Commissioner-General of the 2nd Defendant in a substantive or acting capacity.”
Sarfowaah is urging the court to nullify Mahama’s appointment of Sarpong, claiming it goes against legal provisions.
“The plaintiff claims further or in the alternative, a finding that the appointment of the 1st Defendant, a former employee of KPMG and/or a person with an interest in KPMG or a person who had an interest in KPMG until 21st January 2025, by the President of the Republic of Ghana as the Acting Commissioner-General of the GRA is unlawful as it was made in violation of the laws of Ghana.
“An order revoking the appointment of the 1st Defendant, a former employee of KPMG and/or a person with an interest in KPMG or a person who had an interest in KPMG, by the President of the Republic of Ghana as the Acting Commissioner-General of the GRA,” the document states.
In addition, the plaintiff is seeking an injunction to prevent Sarpong’s continued appointment.
“A perpetual injunction order against the President of the Republic of Ghana restraining him or any person acting by his authority from appointing the 1st Defendant, a former employee of KPMG and/or a person with an interest in KPMG or a person who had an interest in KPMG, as the Acting and/or the Commissioner-General of the GRA.
“Further or in the alternative to relief e), a perpetual injunction order against the Governing Council of the 2nd Defendant restraining the Council or any person acting by its authority from considering and/or proffering advice to the President of the Republic of Ghana as stipulated under Article 195 of the 1992 Constitution in respect of the appointment of the 1st Defendant, a former employee of KPMG and/or a person with an interest in KPMG or a person who had an interest in KPMG, as the Acting and/or the Commissioner-General of the GRA,” it adds.
As the case proceeds, the court has directed all defendants to submit their responses within eight days of receiving the suit.