Tag: Dmitry Medvedev

  • Russia may deploy nuclear weapons if Ukraine’s retaliation is successful – Medvedev

    Russia may deploy nuclear weapons if Ukraine’s retaliation is successful – Medvedev

    Senior Russian official Dmitry Medvedev warned on Sunday that if Ukraine’s counteroffensive is successful, Russia may be obliged to deploy nuclear weapons. This is the latest nuclear threat issued by President Vladimir Putin’s top backer during Moscow’s invasion.

    Imagine for a moment suppose the NATO-supported offensive was successful and a portion of our land was captured. The Russian Presidential Decree’s provisions would therefore force us to use nuclear weapons, stated Medvedev, the deputy head of the Russian Security Council, in a Telegram post.

    The former Russian leader continued, “There would just be no other way out.” “Our adversaries should beg our warriors to prevent the world from engulfing in nuclear conflagration.”

    Throughout Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, Medvedev, the Russian president from 2008 to 2012, has adopted a bellicose demeanour and frequently invoked the possibility of nuclear war.

    He issued a nuclear warning last April should Sweden and Finland join NATO. Stockholm’s path to NATO membership was eased earlier this month after Turkey abandoned its objections, while Helsinki joined the defence alliance later that month.

    In September, Medvedev claimed that Russia might protect Ukrainian territories that had been annexed by it with strategic nuclear weapons.

    And in January, as NATO members discussed sending more weaponry to Ukraine, Medvedev warned that a loss for Russia in the fight may spark a nuclear exchange.

    In January, Medvedev posted on Telegram that “the loss of a nuclear power in a conventional war can provoke the outbreak of a nuclear war.” “Nuclear powers don’t lose significant battles in which their future is at stake.

    “Anyone should understand this. even to a Western politician with even a modicum of competence.

    In a rare admission from a senior Russian official, Medvedev said in his speech on Sunday that Russia may eventually lose the war after nearly 18 months of attrition.

    They also occurred just after the Russian Defence Ministry accused Kiev of launching a drone attack on Moscow. A corporate and shopping complex in the western part of the Russian capital was damaged, the ministry reported, despite the fact that three drones were intercepted on Sunday.

    Both privately and publicly, notably during the previous UN General Assembly, the United States has already warned Russia against using nuclear weapons in Ukraine.

    Putin said last month that Russia had transferred a first batch of tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus, where they had been stationed for “deterrence.”

    Putin stated at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum that Belarus would get the remaining tactical nuclear weapons from Russia “by the end of the summer or by the end of the year.”

    According to the US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), there is “no reason to doubt” Putin’s assertion that Belarus has nuclear weapons.

    However, Matthew Miller, a spokesman for the US State Department, stated at the time that the US had “not seen any reason to adjust our own nuclear posture nor any indication Russia is preparing to use a nuclear weapon.”

    Alexander Lukashenko, the president of Belarus, declared last month that he would use the Russian tactical nuclear weapons stationed on Belarusian land without “hesitation” in the event of assault.

    Senior DIA officials, however, asserted that they did not think Lukashenko would be in charge of the arsenal. Russian authority over it would likely be total, according to the officials.

    The Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 4,477 deployed and reserve nuclear warheads, including around 1,900 tactical nuclear weapons.

  • Russia likely to bomb ICC should Putin be arrested  –  Former President Medvedev

    Russia likely to bomb ICC should Putin be arrested – Former President Medvedev

    Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has called the bluff of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over the arrest warrant issued against President Vladimir Putin.

    Responding to the ICC’s directive, Dmitry Medvedev noted that the Court would not be able to lift a finger against the Russian President due to the repercussions they believe might ensue.

    According to him, the ICC’s assertion is not far from the truth as “It is quite possible to imagine a hypersonic missile being fired from the North Sea from a Russian ship at The Hague courthouse.”

    “That’s why they won’t start a war either. They’ll be afraid to,” he added in a lengthy Telegram post.

    He further noted that the court is “only a miserable international organization, not the population of a NATO country.”

    Medvedev also advised the court’s judges to “look carefully into the sky.”

    He again stated that the arrest warrant for Putin heralds the collapse of international law, calling it “a grim sunset of the whole system of international relations.

    Last Friday, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Putin relating to the “unlawful deportation” of children from occupied areas of Ukraine.

    This came a day after the UN denounced the forced deportations as war crimes. 

    US President Joe Biden says the arrest warrant for Putin is justified.

    According to the warrant, Putin might be detained in any of the more than 100 nations that acknowledge the ICC’s jurisdiction.

    Putin joins former presidents of Sudan and Libya, Omar al-Bashir and Muammar Gaddafi, as the third sitting president to be named in an ICC warrant.

    It has been a week since the arrest warrant was issued and President Putin, who recently hosted China President Xi Jinping, remains a free man.

    Later this year, Putin is scheduled to attend a five-nation economic meeting in South Africa. The South African administration has stated that it will seek clarifications before Putin’s arrival.

    Source: The Independent Ghana

  • Elon Musk compliments a prominent Putin loyalist in a bizarre Twitter interaction

    Elon Musk, the inventor of Tesla, has become increasingly significant in discussions about the Ukraine conflict, amid new accusations that he has communicated with Vladimir Putin.

    He drew severe criticism after proposing a peace plan in which Ukraine ceded Crimea to Russia.

    His latest intervention involves a somewhat bizarre Twitter exchange with former Russian prime minister, senior Kremlin official, and prominent Putin ally Dmitry Medvedev.

    Musk had complimented Mr Medvedev on a “pretty good troll” after he ridiculed outgoing prime minister Liz Truss.

    He then asked the deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia about it the current situation in Bakhmut, which has faced intense Russian shelling over recent days.

    Mr Medvedev concluded (for now at least) the seemingly friendly discussion by suggesting he would see Musk “in Moscow on the Victory Day”.

     

  • What is Vladimir Putin thinking and planning?

    It’s the question we’ve been asking for months now, even before Russia invaded Ukraine.

    What is Vladimir Putin thinking and planning?

    Let me get the disclaimer in early. I have no Kremlin crystal ball. Neither do I have Putin on direct dial.

    Former US President George W Bush once said he’d looked Vladimir Putin in the eye and “got a sense of his soul”. Look how well that ended for relations between Russia and the West.

    So, getting inside the mind of the Kremlin leader is a pretty thankless task. But it’s important to try. Perhaps more than ever now, in light of recent nuclear sabre-rattling by Moscow.

    There’s little doubt that the Russian president is under pressure. His so-called “special military operation” in Ukraine has gone badly wrong for him.

    It was supposed to last a few days. But we’re nearly eight months in and there’s no end in sight.

    The Kremlin admits “significant” troop losses; in recent weeks the Russian military has been losing territory in Ukraine which it had previously occupied.

    To boost troop numbers, last month President Putin declared partial mobilisation, something he’d insisted he wouldn’t do. Meanwhile, sanctions continue to degrade the Russian economy.

    So, back to Putin’s state of mind. Will he be thinking he got it all wrong, that his decision to invade was a fundamental error?

    Don’t assume so.

    “Putin’s perceptions drive the entire situation in this conflict,” believes Konstantin Remchukov, owner and editor-in-chief of the Russian newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta.

    “He is the authoritarian leader of nuclear power. He’s the unchallenged leader in this country. He has some strong beliefs and perceptions which drive him crazy. He’s started to believe that this is existential from the point of view of importance. Not only for him. But for the future of Russia.”

    If this conflict is existential, how far is President Putin prepared to go to win it?

    In recent months senior Russian officials (including Putin himself) have been dropping unsubtle hints that the Kremlin leader would be prepared to use nuclear weapons in this conflict.

    “I don’t think he will,” US President Joe Biden told CNN. “But I think that it’s irresponsible for him to talk about it.”

    A destroyed Russian tank in Ukraine's north-eastern Kharkiv region. Photo: 7 October 2022
    IMAGE SOURCE,EPA Image caption, Russian troops were forced to make a humiliating retreat from nearly all of Ukraine’s north-eastern Kharkiv region in September

    This week’s intense Russian bombardment of Ukraine suggests the Kremlin is, at the very least, determined to escalate things with Kyiv.

    With the West, too?

    “He’s trying to avoid direct confrontation with the West, but at the same time he’s prepared for it,” believes veteran liberal politician Grigory Yavlinsky. “I fear most the possibility of nuclear conflict. And, on the second place, I fear endless war”.

    But “endless war” requires endless resources. That’s something Russia doesn’t seem to have. The wave of missile strikes on Ukrainian cities is a dramatic demonstration of force, but how long can Moscow sustain that?

    “Could you continue this missile flow for days, weeks, months? Many experts doubt that we have enough missiles,” says Mr Remchukov.

    “Also, from the military point of view, no one has ever said what would be the sign of ultimate [Russian] victory? What is the symbol of victory? In 1945 it was the banner over Berlin. What is the criteria for success now? [A banner] over Kyiv? Over Kherson? Over Kharkiv? I don’t know. Nobody knows.”

    It’s not even clear that Vladimir Putin knows.

    Back in February, the Kremlin’s objective appears to have been the rapid defeat of Ukraine, forcing Russia’s neighbour back into Moscow’s orbit without a prolonged war. He miscalculated. He underestimated not only the determination of the Ukrainian army and people to defend their land but the capabilities of his own military.

    What’s he thinking now? Is Vladimir Putin’s current plan to cement control over Ukrainian territory he claims to have annexed and then freeze the conflict? Or is he determined to push on until the whole of Ukraine is back in the Kremlin’s sphere of influence?

    This week former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev wrote: “The Ukrainian state in its current configuration… will be a constant, direct, and clear threat to Russia. I believe the aim of our future actions should be the complete dismantling of Ukraine’s political regime.”

    If Mr Medvedev’s words reflect President Putin’s thinking, expect a protracted and bloody conflict.

    A Russian reservist bids farewell to relatives in the Siberian city of Omsk, Russia. Photo: 7 October 2022
    IMAGE SOURCE,REUTERS Image caption, Russia’s military says it wants to mobilise 300,000 reservists – but there appears to be growing opposition to the move across the country

    But, inevitably, Mr Putin’s actions abroad are having consequences at home. Over years the Kremlin painstakingly cultivated Putin’s image of “Mr Stability”, encouraging the Russian public to believe that as long as he was in charge they would be safe.

    That’s a hard sell now.

    “The previous contract between Putin and society was that ‘I protect you,” says Mr Remchukov.

    “For many years the main slogan was ‘predictability’. What kind of predictability is there today? The concept is over. Nothing is predictable. My journalists don’t know whether they will receive call-up papers when they get home today.”

    Vladimir Putin‘s decision to invade Ukraine surprised many. But not Mr Yavlinsky.

    “I think that [Putin] had been moving in that direction – year by year he was constructing the way to what we have now,” Mr Yavlinsky says.

    “For example, destroying independent media. He stated that in 2001. Destroying independent business. He stated that in 2003. Then 2014 and what happened with Crimea and Donbas? You’d have to be blind not to see it.

    “Russia’s problem is our system. A system was created here that created such a person [as Putin]. The question of the West’s role in creating this system is a very serious one.

    “The problem is that this system didn’t create a society. There are a lot of very nice people in Russia. But there is no civil society. That’s why Russia can’t resist.”

    DISCLAIMER: Independentghana.com will not be liable for any inaccuracies contained in this article. The views expressed in the article are solely those of the author’s and do not reflect those of The Independent Ghana

    Source: bbc.com

     

  • Kadyrov says Russia should use low-yield nuclear weapon

    After a significant fresh defeat on the battlefield, Ramzan Kadyrov, the leader of Russia’s Chechnya region, suggested on Saturday that Moscow might use a low-yield nuclear weapon in Ukraine.

    As Russia confirmed the loss of its stronghold of Lyman in eastern Ukraine, Kadyrov slammed top commanders for their failings and wrote on Telegram: “In my personal opinion, more drastic measures should be taken, right up to the declaration of martial law in the border areas and the use of low-yield nuclear weapons”.

    He was speaking a day after President Vladimir Putin proclaimed the annexation of four Ukrainian regions – including Donetsk, where Lyman is located – and placed them under Russia’s nuclear umbrella, saying Moscow would defend the lands it had seized “with all our strength and all our means”.

    Russia has the world’s largest atomic arsenal, including low-yield tactical nuclear weapons that are designed to be deployed against opposing armies.

    Other top Putin allies, including former president Dmitry Medvedev, have suggested that Russia may need to resort to nuclear weapons, but Kadyrov’s call was the most urgent and explicit.

    The influential ruler of the Caucasus region of Chechnya has been a vocal champion of the war in Ukraine, with Chechen forces forming part of the vanguard of the Russian army there. Kadyrov is widely believed to be personally close to Putin, who appointed him to govern restive Chechnya in 2007.