TIG Post

Tag: anti-LGBTQ

  • Mahama’s appointment to Sam George meant to silence anti-LGBTQ advocacy – Musah Superior alleges

    Mahama’s appointment to Sam George meant to silence anti-LGBTQ advocacy – Musah Superior alleges

    Former Deputy Chief Executive of the Forestry Commission, Musah Superior, has suggested that President John Dramani Mahama’s decision to appoint Sam George as Communications Minister is a deliberate attempt to quell his strong stance on the Anti-LGBTQI+ Bill.

    According to Superior, Mahama’s changing approach to the controversial bill is linked to his recent ministerial appointments.

    In an interview on Oyerepa FM on January 28, 2025, Musah Superior highlighted Sam George’s previously vocal advocacy for the bill, noting that George had been one of its fiercest proponents ahead of the 2024 elections. Superior recalled how George had even warned Mahama that he would “know no peace” if the former president failed to sign the bill into law.

    However, Superior argued that Mahama’s position on the bill seemed to have shifted after his victory, with the president now calling for further discussions rather than a decisive commitment to passing the legislation. “You know this gay, lesbian thing. You know how Sam George and Mahama were forceful about it, and Mahama said he is a Christian and that his faith will not allow him to encourage it,” Superior said.

    He continued, “Mahama was the number one person at every NDC rally insisting Akufo-Addo should sign it, and I also insisted Akufo-Addo should sign it, but it was so unfortunate that President Akufo-Addo didn’t sign the bill. Today, Mahama is flip-flopping. He is saying we have to have communication and this and that.”

    Superior further claimed that Mahama’s change in tone was directly related to his appointment of Sam George, suggesting that the president was trying to suppress George’s advocacy. “Do you know that he is intimidating the person he has nominated as Communications Minister? He is saying that it is no longer a private members’ bill, so the government will own it,” he alleged. “And then he has given the loudest person, the leader of that crusade, a juicy appointment… and Sam George has told Ghanaians that if Mahama doesn’t follow through, he will not know peace.”

    Meanwhile, Sam George, the Communications, Digitalisation, and Innovation Minister-nominee, has reiterated his commitment to bringing back the Anti-LGBTQ bill in the 9th Parliament. During his vetting on January 30, 2025, George underscored that the bill is not about discrimination but about upholding Ghana’s moral and cultural values.

    “This is a matter of principle and national interest. The Anti-Gay Bill is not about discrimination but about preserving our moral and cultural values as a country,” he stated. George emphasized that although Ghana respects human rights, certain practices are incompatible with the nation’s cultural heritage.

    The previous iteration of the bill expired after the dissolution of the 8th Parliament, but George expressed confidence that once reintroduced, it will receive widespread support. “The people of Ghana have spoken clearly on this issue, and as their representative, I will ensure that their voice is heard,” he remarked.

    In response to concerns from international organizations, George dismissed any external pressure, asserting that Ghana has the sovereign right to determine its own laws. He reaffirmed his determination to work with Parliament and relevant stakeholders to push the bill through, stressing the importance of protecting Ghana’s societal values.

    https://twitter.com/oyerepaofficial/status/1884203630670299247?s=12

  • AG gets 7-day grace period to file statement in Anti-LGBTQ case

    AG gets 7-day grace period to file statement in Anti-LGBTQ case

    The Supreme Court of Ghana has provided the Attorney General’s Department with an extension, granting them an additional seven days to file their statement of case in the ongoing legal dispute involving journalist and private legal practitioner Richard Dela Sky and the Speaker of Parliament.

    This case addresses the controversial Ghanaian Family Values Bill, which has raised significant constitutional questions.

    During the court proceedings, the State Attorney requested the court to compel the Speaker’s legal team to submit a Financial Impact Analysis report concerning the Family Values Bill.

    The State Attorney argued that this analysis is vital, as it could significantly influence the case’s outcome by highlighting the financial implications of the proposed legislation.

    Richard Dela Sky, the plaintiff, is challenging the bill on constitutional grounds, asserting that it violates fundamental human rights protected by the Ghanaian Constitution, including equality and freedom from discrimination.

    He argued that the Family Values Bill could lead to increased discrimination against marginalized groups, particularly the LGBTQ+ community, and undermine the dignity of individuals.

    Moreover, Dela Sky is seeking an order from the Supreme Court to restrain the President from assenting to the bill, contending that doing so would violate constitutional safeguards for the rights and liberties of Ghanaians.

    The State Attorney highlighted the importance of the Financial Impact Analysis, stating that it would provide insight into the potential economic consequences of the bill’s implementation and its alignment with the national budget and social services.

  • “Govt and governance CAN and MUST continue to RUN” – Kweku Baako on Speaker-Presidency ‘stand-off’

    “Govt and governance CAN and MUST continue to RUN” – Kweku Baako on Speaker-Presidency ‘stand-off’

    Amid the ongoing clash between President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo and parliament, specifically Speaker Alban Bagbin, over the halt in the approval process for ministerial nominees, Abdul Malik Kweku Baako, the Editor-in-Chief of the New Crusading Guide, has shared his insights on the issue.

    The disagreement arises from President Akufo-Addo’s refusal to sign the recently passed Anti-LGBT+ Bill, raising questions about the legal grounds for Speaker Bagbin’s decision to suspend the approval of the nominees.

    Krobea Kwabena Asante, a member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) campaign team, expressed concerns about the connection between the reassigned ministers and the Speaker’s decision to halt their approvals.

    In response, Abdul Malik Kweku Baako stressed the importance of maintaining patience and resilience during times of political discord. He acknowledged the presence of what he termed “legislative comedy” within democracy, indicating that such disagreements are not uncommon and should not cause alarm among citizens.

    “Government and governance CAN and MUST continue to RUN! There’s room for ‘legislative comedy’ in democracy. No Alarm for Cause! Sorry, I meant, ‘NO CAUSE FOR ALARM’! Let all citizens stay patient and resilient! Ghana Lives!” he wrote in a Facebook post on March 21, 2024.

    On March 20, Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin declared that the House would not approve the new ministerial appointees, citing the need to uphold the rule of law. Bagbin’s decision followed a letter from the presidency instructing parliament to halt forwarding the Anti-LGBT+ Bill for the president’s assent until a suit against the Bill at the Supreme Court is resolved.

    However, Attorney-General Godfred Dame believes that the Speaker of Parliament may have been misled or misinformed, leading to his decision to suspend the approval of the ministerial nominees until after the Supreme Court concludes its review of the suit against the president’s nominations.

  • Assenting to anti-gay bill will destroy victims – Samia Nkrumah to Akufo-Addo

    Assenting to anti-gay bill will destroy victims – Samia Nkrumah to Akufo-Addo

    A former Member of Parliament for Jomoro, Samia Yaba Nkrumah, has called on President Akufo-Addo to withhold his approval of the contentious anti-LGBT+ bill.

    Criticizing the legislation as excessively “harsh and unjust,” Nkrumah expressed concerns that it could further deepen divisions within Ghanaian society.

    She urged President Akufo-Addo to exercise caution and advocated for a more inclusive and education-focused approach rather than endorsing the proposed law.

    In an interview with Daily Graphic, she stated, “I pray the president does not sign it or assent to it. I believe it is a brutal, harsh, and unjust law, and we don’t need it. We are against rape, paedophilia, against all these situations that people seem to be terrified of gays, and I think we need to educate ourselves.

    “But most importantly, I don’t support anything that brings division and torments the people of Ghana. We are all Ghanaians, and we need to protect and take care of each other”.

    In the midst of the controversy, President Akufo-Addo has declared a temporary halt on assenting to the anti-LGBT+ bill pending a Supreme Court ruling on its constitutionality.

    He informed the diplomatic community of a pending case challenging the bill’s legality and assured them that Ghana remains committed to human rights and the rule of law.

    The bill has elicited widespread reactions nationally and internationally, with the Ministry of Finance advising against its approval due to potential repercussions for the country’s financial support from international organizations. The President emphasized the need to await the court’s decision before taking any action, acknowledging concerns raised by the diplomatic community about the bill’s passage through Parliament.

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill: We are a secular state, not a theocracy – Prof Gadzekpo

    Anti-LGBTQ bill: We are a secular state, not a theocracy – Prof Gadzekpo

    Professor Audrey Gadzekpo, the Board Chair of the Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), has noted that Human Rights and Family Values Bill must be scrutinised thoroughly to ensure that the rights and freedoms of Ghanaians are not infringed upon.

    According to her, this is of utmost importance as the West African state is regarded as a secular state and not a country that practices theocracy.

    In an interview on JoyNews’ Newsfile over the weekend, she made the statement in response to the welcoming of the bill by National Chief Imam, Sheikh Osman Nuhu Sharubutu.

    “I can understand where religious people like Sheikh Shaibu and Chief Imam would be happy that there is a bill that speaks to their religious convictions. But I cannot say it enough, we are a secular state. We are not a theocracy.

    Identifying yourself as same-sex attraction may be a sin, which we can all abhor. Maybe a cultural abomination to us but it is not a crime and we must make those distinctions. We need to subject it to the Supreme Court for constitutional interpretation,” she said.

    A theocracy is a form of government in which religious institutions or religious leaders hold political power, and the state’s legal system is based on religious law. In a theocracy, the government is typically guided by religious principles, and religious authorities often play a significant role in shaping and enforcing laws.

    Where as a secular state is a state or country that is officially neutral in matters of religion, neither supporting nor opposing any particular religious beliefs or practices. In a secular state, the government does not officially endorse any religion and treats all religions and religious groups equally under the law. This principle is often enshrined in the state’s constitution or legal framework.

    But Mr Sam George, one of the proponents of the anti-LGBTQ bill thinks otherwise.

    In November 2021, Mr George while addressing the Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee of Parliament stated that Ghana is not a secular state as suggested by some individuals opposing the anti-LGBTQ Bill. According to him, Ghana is a pluralistic religious state.

    “Ghana is not a secular state. People have made that statement that Ghana is a secular state and we must allow it (LGBTQ). Ghana is a pluralistic religious state.

    Today, before we started this meeting, you asked for a prayer. A secular state is a complete dissolution between the state and religion like France. You either ask for a Christian, Muslim or Traditional prayer.”

    Meanwhile, National Chief Imam, Sheikh Osman Nuhu Sharubutu, has voiced his enthusiasm regarding the recent approval of the contentious anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

    In an interview on JoyNews’ Newsfile on March 2, Sheikh Aremeyaw Shaibu, the spokesperson for the Chief Imam, expressed the Muslim community’s joy, stating that the bill would help uphold family values.

     “I can say without any equivocation that the Chief Imam was relatively joyful about the passing of this bill because he has fully been briefed about what we are going through with respect to the evolvement of this LGBTQ+ phenomenon in our country and the attempt to really universalise it and make it something normal and something acceptable.

    “And as somebody who is the leader of Muslims in this country, he could not actually give any support to such matter to be allowed.

    “For us, it is a moral issue, it is something that also goes to the very heart of the protection of the family which in the Muslim understanding of things is the property of God. It is the smallest unit of society into which every single human being is born,” he said.

    He clarified that anything that undermines the family system will not receive their support.

    “Any practice that seeks to undermine the survival of the family must truly be condemned. For us, it is reprehensible, abominable, and objectionable. So Chief Imam is so happy,” he added.

    As it stands now, Parliament has tabled the bill at the President’s desk for President Akufo-Addo to assent to the bill to become law.

    The Anti-LGBTQ+ bill aims to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities in Ghana. It proposes strict penalties, including imprisonment, for individuals engaged in activities related to homosexuality and LGBTQ+ advocacy.

    Additionally, the bill seeks to prohibit the promotion of LGBTQ+ rights, organizations, and events in Ghana.

    Prior to its passage, there had been several amendments to the bill. After deliberation, Parliament decided that the minimum custodial sentence has been set at three years, with a maximum of five years for promoters and sympathisers.

    Additionally, individuals caught directly engaging in these activities will face a minimum sentence of six months, extendable to a maximum of three years.

    Ghana is among many African countries that are working to rid LGBTQ activities in the society. Uganda enacted one of the world’s harshest anti-gay laws in May, which calls for the death penalty for certain same-sex acts.

    Following this, the country faced sanctions from international communities. The U.S. imposed a first round of visa restrictions on Ugandan officials in response to the law in June, and the World Bank halted new lending to the country in August.

    The concern now is Ghana could face similar sanctions and be blocked from receiving financial aid from countries that uphold LGBTQ rights. But Parliamentarians have noted that Ghana is poised to withstand whatever pro-LGBTQ countries throw at them.

  • Educate Ghanaians on the positive and negative impact of anti-LGBTQ bill – Gabby tells MPs, media

    Educate Ghanaians on the positive and negative impact of anti-LGBTQ bill – Gabby tells MPs, media

    A prominent member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Gabby Otchere-Darko, has entreated the media and politicians to inform the public about the pros and cons of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, 2021, popularly known as the anti-gay Bill.

    In a post on X, he stressed the need for balanced reporting. Mr Otchere-Darko highlighted that Ghana’s parliament, representing the sovereign will of the people, had democratically passed the bill.

    He acknowledged the presence of a “culture of silence” in parliament, suggesting that lawmakers may have been reluctant to oppose the bill due to potential consequences.

    “But, Ghanaians must also understand that it comes with consequences. Choices have consequences. We expect the media and the politicians to be fair to the people by letting them know the pros and cons of this decision to impose stiffer penalties against gays, etc,” he wrote.

    Despite the bill’s popular support in Ghana, Otchere-Darko emphasized the importance of understanding its implications.

    He also expressed confidence in Ghana’s democratic institutions and urged Ghanaians to respect the choices made by parliament, while also advocating for a balance between traditional family values and tolerance for diversity.

  • Go to court if you think anti-LGBTQ bill is constitutionally wrong – Gabby Otchere Darko

    Go to court if you think anti-LGBTQ bill is constitutionally wrong – Gabby Otchere Darko

    A prominent member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Gabby Otchere-Darko, has called on individuals opposed to Ghana’s recently passed anti-LGBTQ bill to challenge its constitutionality in court.

    Mr Otchere-Darko emphasized that it is their democratic right to seek legal redress.

    “We also expect those who believe the bill is constitutionally wrong to do what is right and go to court.

    “That is democracy! Our institutions of democracy are still strong and alive. Let’s have faith in our democracy. Let’s respect the choices we make and their consequences and believe in the process,” he wrote.

    This comes after the Board Chair for the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD) Ghana, Professor Audrey Gadzekpo, says activists who are against the passing of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, 2021, popularly known as the anti-gay Bill, will go to the Supreme Court to get redress since the Bill in its current state violates human rights.

    In a statement posted on social media platform X, Mr Otchere-Darko highlighted that Ghana’s parliament, representing the sovereign will of the people, had democratically passed the bill.

    He acknowledged the presence of a “culture of silence” in parliament, suggesting that lawmakers may have been reluctant to oppose the bill due to potential consequences.

    Despite the bill’s popular support in Ghana, Otchere-Darko emphasized the importance of understanding its implications. He called on the media and politicians to inform the public about the pros and cons of the bill, stressing the need for balanced reporting.

    He expressed confidence in Ghana’s democratic institutions and urged Ghanaians to respect the choices made by parliament, while also advocating for a balance between traditional family values and tolerance for diversity.

    In conclusion, Otchere-Darko reiterated his belief in Ghana’s ability to uphold its traditional values while embracing tolerance and diversity, highlighting these as fundamental aspects of Ghanaian culture and spirit.

    “I still believe, though, that we can balance our traditional family values with our traditional values of tolerance and diversity. That’s the Ghanaian way. The Ghanaian culture. The Ghanaian spirit. Our history. Our DNA. That is Ghanaian,” he wrote.

    Prior to this, he noted that the activities of the LGBTQ community pose no threat to Ghana’s family values in comparison to the activities of mistresses and paramours of married men and women, also known as side chicks and side dudes.

    According to him, “the biggest threat to family values in our society is caused by side chicks and side dudes” as they break homes.

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill will worsen fear and hatred – UNAIDS

    Anti-LGBTQ bill will worsen fear and hatred – UNAIDS

    Executive Director of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Winnie Byanyima, has voiced serious concerns regarding the approval of Ghana’s Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly known as the anti-gay bill.

    The legislation, which criminalizes and prohibits LGBT activities, was passed on Wednesday, February 28, 2024, drawing criticism from various quarters, including prominent figures like Professor Audrey Gadzekpo, the Board Chair of the Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), and the United States ambassador.

    In a statement, Byanyima emphasized that while the bill has not yet become law, its potential enactment could incite violence among Ghanaians and impede access to life-saving services.

    She warned that the legislation might undermine social protection and hinder Ghana’s developmental progress, affecting fundamental liberties such as freedom of speech, association, and movement.

    Byanyima argued that the bill could have severe repercussions on various fronts, including its adverse impact on the fight against AIDS and the overall jeopardization of public health.

    The statement highlighted the potential harm that such legislation could cause to individual freedoms and the broader efforts to combat health challenges.

  • US Ambassador sends strong warning to Ghana over Anti-LGBTQ+ bill passage

    US Ambassador sends strong warning to Ghana over Anti-LGBTQ+ bill passage

    U.S. Ambassador to Ghana, Virginia Palmer, has expressed deep sadness over the Ghana’s Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill’s passage, highlighting the impact it will have on the rights of LGBTQ individuals and all Ghanaians.

    She emphasized that the bill not only infringes upon basic human rights but also undermines constitutional freedoms such as freedom of speech, assembly, and the press.

    Palmer warned of the negative implications the bill could have on public order, public health, Ghana’s international reputation, and its economy.

    “I am saddened because some of the smartest, most creative, most decent people I know are LGBT. The bill Parliament passed takes away not only their basic human rights but those of all Ghanaians because it undermines their constitutional rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press. It will be bad for public order and public health. If enacted, it will also hurt Ghana’s international reputation and Ghana’s economy.”

    The bill, which aims to criminalize LGBTQ activities in Ghana, proposes strict penalties, including imprisonment, for individuals engaged in such activities and LGBTQ advocacy.

    It also seeks to prohibit the promotion of LGBTQ rights, organizations, and events in the country. Despite efforts by some members of Parliament to amend the bill citing human rights concerns, the bill ultimately passed after a contentious session.

    Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin’s attempts to make amendments during the second consideration stage were rejected by the Minority, leading to the Speaker pushing for the third consideration stage, where the bill was passed with a voice vote.

    Now, the bill awaits President Akufo-Addo’s assent to become law. Prior to its passage, there were several amendments made to the bill, including setting a minimum custodial sentence of three years and a maximum of five years for promoters and sympathizers.

    Individuals caught directly engaging in LGBTQ activities will face a minimum sentence of six months, extendable to a maximum of three years.

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill passage will be detrimental to valuable public health, media, economy – US warns Ghanaians

    Anti-LGBTQ bill passage will be detrimental to valuable public health, media, economy – US warns Ghanaians

    The United States has expressed deep concern over the passage of stringent anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in Ghana, stating that it threatens constitutional freedoms.

    The new bill, passed on Wednesday, imposes a prison sentence of up to three years for anyone convicted of identifying as LGBTQ+. It also imposes a maximum five-year jail term for forming or funding LGBTQ+ groups.

    The passage of the bill has been criticized by rights organizations and other groups.

    “The bill would also undermine Ghana’s valuable public health, media and civic spaces, and economy,” the US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said in a statement.

    It has called for the “review of the constitutionality of the bill”.

    Meanwhile, Rightify Ghana has strongly condemned “this regressive legislation, which poses a grave threat to the rights and freedoms of LGBTQ+ individuals in the country”.

    UNAids executive director Winnie Byanyima said the bill, if it becomes law, could incite violence by Ghanaians against their fellow citizens.

    She said that it will “obstruct access to life-saving services, undercut social protection, and jeopardise Ghana’s development success.”

    The bill will be presented to President Nana Akufo-Addo after which he’ll have seven days to sign it into law or refuse to assent to it, according to Ghana’s constitution.

  • Anti-LGBTQ bill is not targeting members but their actions not backed by science – Sam George

    Anti-LGBTQ bill is not targeting members but their actions not backed by science – Sam George

    Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampam constituency, Sam George, has clarified that the criminalization of LGBTQ pertains to the act itself, not the individuals involved.

    He emphasized that anyone choosing to engage in LGBTQ activities must face the consequences.

    Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, February 17, Mr. George dismissed claims by the Deputy Majority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, who suggested that the LGBTQ act is behavioral.

    The Ningo-Prampram MP emphasized that the LGBTQ act is not supported by science but is merely an opinion.

    “It is not backed by science and is one that I would call emotional. The science and the facts establish the fact that homosexuality is not behavioral, and I can take anybody on that debate,” he stated.

    Mr. George stressed that “if you want to be objective, you cannot be selective in your objectivity.”

    Mr. Afenyo-Markin took a stand against the third reading of the anti-LGBTQ bill in Parliament on Thursday, February 15. While he expressed support for the principles of the bill, he emphasized his opposition to the provision that would result in the imprisonment of individuals accused of engaging in or promoting LGBTQ activities.

    “The essence of this motion is to afford this august house the opportunity to thoroughly consider amendments that are proposed in the bill with the view of substituting community service for incarceration,” he said.

    According to him, the bill’s punitive action would not aid in rehabilitating the culprits.

    “The issue before us is behavioral, and it is my humble view that in dealing with behavioural matters, incarceration is not the solution. It makes the matter worse.

    He explained that “to jail a person for his/her sexuality will not be the solution in maintaining our Ghanaian family values and ensuring proper human sexual rights.”

    Parliament, on Thursday, February 8, approved a three-to-five-year jail term for individuals who willfully promote or sponsor LGBTQ activities. Those caught in the act are to be sentenced to a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 3 years.

  • Watch Afenyo-Markin ‘frustrating’ the anti-LGBTQ bill in Parliament

    Watch Afenyo-Markin ‘frustrating’ the anti-LGBTQ bill in Parliament

    Deputy Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has voiced his opposition to an amendment proposed for the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the anti-gay bill.

    Despite his objections, Parliament has gone ahead and approved the amendment.

    The approved amendment entails imposing a custodial sentence of up to six months on individuals who aid, facilitate, encourage, or promote LGBTQ activities. This amendment was put forward by co-sponsor of the bill, Sam George, who believes that stringent punishment is necessary to ensure compliance with the law once it is enacted.

    Under the amended bill, currently in the consideration stage, those found guilty of promoting LGBTQ activities will face a minimum sentence of three months and a maximum of six months, or a fine ranging from GH₵600 to GH₵1200.

    However, Mr. Afenyo-Markin is advocating for a shorter custodial sentence of not more than three months.

    He argues that imprisonment not only imposes costs on the state but also cites studies suggesting that individuals often fare worse when they go to prison.

    Also addressing parliament, Mr Afenyo-Markin noted that, “we should rather look at one month and three months, instead of three months and six months. Yes, if the commensurate penalty unit cannot be defined within the context of the proposal which is two months and four months, then we should not go higher.”

    On fine, he added “the court has a position on sentencing. It’s the reason why we have now introduced this plea bargain thing. The plea bargain in law that we have enacted is also aimed at dealing with some of these things. In even serious criminal matters if the person is ready to pay to deal with the issue of the time for the trial and all, and also depopulate our prisons.

    “Even when people go to prison, they become worse off and a lot of studies have shown that.”

    He emphasized the importance of retaining the option of a fine, stating, “this parliament must not depart from that. So please colleagues, we cannot do away with a fine. And we should not attempt to say that merely being guilty of this should lead to imprisonment without an option for a fine. Let’s be careful.”

  • Parliament is ready to counter Akufo-Addo’s rejection of anti-LGBTQ+ bill – Minority

    Parliament is ready to counter Akufo-Addo’s rejection of anti-LGBTQ+ bill – Minority

    Minority Leader Dr Cassiel Ato Forson has communicated Parliament’s readiness to override President Akufo-Addo’s potential veto of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, commonly known as the anti-LGBTQ+ Bill.

    Dr Ato Forson emphasized Parliament’s dedication to fulfilling its duties regardless of any unconstitutional actions taken by President Akufo-Addo.

    President Akufo-Addo has rejected three bills passed by the House last year, citing their status as private members’ bills and their impact on the Consolidated Fund.

    The anti-LGBTQ+ bill, also classified as a private members’ bill, includes provisions that incur charges on the consolidated fund.

    During a media briefing on Wednesday, February 7, Dr. Ato Forson clarified that if the President opts not to sign the bill into law, Parliament retains the power to override his decision through a two-thirds majority vote.

    “There are rumours out there that after passage, the president did not sign it into law. However, the constitution envisioned this, and it said the house will have to use a certain approach which is the house using the two-thirds majority of members to approve it.”

    “So let us deal with the first hurdle and get it passed and then send it to the President and if he fails to assent, we will take a decision,” he said.

    However, during the same briefing, Majority Leader Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu also indicated that Parliament will persist in discussions regarding the constitutional concerns raised about the bill.

    Meanwhile, Parliament has approved an amendment to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, which imposes up to six months of a custodial sentence on individuals who aid, facilitate, encourage, or promote LGBTQ activities.

    The amendment, proposed by co-sponsor of the bill Sam George, aims to ensure strict compliance with the law once passed.

    Under the amended bill, those found guilty of promoting LGBTQ activities will face a minimum sentence of three months and a maximum of six months, or a fine ranging from GH₵600 to GH₵1200.

    Speaking in Parliament, Sam George said that, “for me, even the GH¢600 is a bargain because it aims to prevent lengthy custodial sentences.

    “However, judges retain the discretion to impose fines, imprisonment, or both. Therefore, I believe that GH₵600 to GH₵1200, or a minimum of three months and a maximum of six months, serves as an adequate deterrent.”

    However, Deputy Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin opposes the amendment, advocating for a custodial sentence of no more than three months.

    He argued that imprisonment not only incurs state costs, but there have been studies that show that people go to prison and become worse off after their release.

    Also addressing Parliament, Mr Afenyo-Markin noted, “we should rather look at one month and three months, instead of three months and six months. Yes, if the commensurate penalty unit cannot be defined within the context of the proposal which is two months and four months, then we should not go higher.”

    On fine, he added “the court has a position on sentencing. It’s the reason why we now have introduced this plea bargain thing. The plea bargain in law that we have enacted is also aimed at dealing with some of these things.”

    “In even serious criminal matters if the person is ready to pay to deal with the issue of the time for the trial and all, and also depopulate our prisons,” he said they are allowed the option of fine.

  • Parliament to begin recess Dec 22; anti-LGBTQ, witchcraft bills, others approval pending

    Parliament to begin recess Dec 22; anti-LGBTQ, witchcraft bills, others approval pending

    Parliament is slated to adjourn sine die on Friday, December 22, 2023, according to the Majority Chief Whip, Frank Annoh Dompreh, who outlined the upcoming week’s business in a recent statement.

    Emphasizing the importance of adhering to the planned schedule, Mr Dompreh urged all members to remain committed to the scheduled business, aiming for a seamless adjournment on the specified date.

    To expedite the resolution of pending matters, the House is expected to convene on both Mondays and Saturdays.

    The Business Committee anticipates no further meetings until the adjournment sine die, he added.

    “The Business Committee takes this opportunity to sincerely commend you, Rt. Hon. Speaker, your deputies, and all Hon. Members for the sacrifice and devotion to the business of the House during this Third Meeting. Remarkable among them is the willingness to sit for long hours and even on Mondays and a Saturday to consider the business of the House. The Committee urges all Hon. Members to sustain the enthusiasm until the House adjourns sine die,” he said.

    In expressing gratitude, Mr Dompreh acknowledged the dedication of Rt. Hon. Speaker, deputies, and all Hon. Members throughout the Third Meeting.

    He specifically noted their willingness to extend working hours and convene on unconventional days, urging members to maintain this commitment until the sine die adjournment.

    Concluding his statement, Mr Dompreh extended wishes for a joyful yuletide and recess to all members, expressing optimism for a healthy return during the Fourth Session’s proceedings.

  • Parliamentary Legal Committee Chair calls for removal of Clause 4 of anti-LGBTQ bill

    Parliamentary Legal Committee Chair calls for removal of Clause 4 of anti-LGBTQ bill

    The Chairman of the Constitutional, Legal, and Parliamentary Affairs Committee of Parliament, Kwame Anyimadu Antwi, has proposed the deletion of Clause 4 of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill.

    Clause 4 of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill creates an offense related to undermining proper human sexual rights and Ghanaian family values.

    He argues that the clause is ambiguous and highly subjective in nature, a decision made following engagements with the Attorney-General, hence the need to delete it.

    Quoting recommendations from the Attorney General, Godfred Dame, Mr. Anyimadu Antwi said, “Though this clause creates an offence relating to undermining proper human sexual rights and Ghanaian family values what constitutes ‘undermine’ is not defined and therefore the basis of the offence cannot be determined.

    “Mr. Speaker this is the advice the learned Attorney General gave to the committee and the entire committee agreed on this advice. And that’s why we agreed as has been said by ranking that it was too much of subjectivity and ambiguities and that is why we propose that in deleting and creating an offence we shouldn’t be having ambiguities and subjectivities. That is why the proposal is to delete the entire clause.”

    Meanwhile, the sponsors of the bill are not enthused about the recommendation made. South Dayi MP, Rockson-Nelson Defeamekpor said that clause was integral to the entire bill and thus deleting it would be erroneous.

    “Mr. Speaker the essence of four is so cardinal to this legislation. So, so cardinal, so, so fundamental to it. I’ve been struggling to appreciate the point made by the ranking member that this offence in article 39, he’s not been able to point it out.

    “The subjectivity element that he points to that, too I am struggling to appreciate.

    “Because you see when we enacted the provision this way, subject to the enhancement contained in the amendments listed thereafter, there will be investigations if somebody makes a complaint that clause four which subsequently will become section four has been breached, that is not the end of it. Investigations will be conducted. It is the investigation that will establish a prima facie that indeed clause four subsequently section four of the law has been breached or not,” he explained.

    The Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill is currently at the consideration stage and Speaker Alban Bagbin has assured of its passing before the House goes on recess for the Yuletide season.

  • We will pass anti-LGBTQ bill before Christmas break – Speaker Bagbin assures

    We will pass anti-LGBTQ bill before Christmas break – Speaker Bagbin assures

    The Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has given assurance that the bill concerning the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values will be passed before the parliamentary recess for the festive holidays.

    This announcement follows accusations from the sponsors of the Anti-Gay bill, who claimed that the Majority in Parliament was obstructing the bill’s passage.

    The First Deputy Speaker had declined a request for the bill to proceed to the consideration stage, leading to allegations of deliberate delays by the Majority Caucus.

    One of the bill’s proponents, Samuel Nartey George, a Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampram, accused the Majority Caucus of intentionally frustrating the bill’s progress. He mentioned that the next strategy would involve revealing the names of Majority MPs allegedly influenced by individuals advocating for the promotion of LGBT activities in the country.

    However, the Majority Caucus denied these allegations. Kwame Anyimadu-Antwi, Chairman of the Constitutional, Legal, and Parliamentary Affairs Committee in Parliament, refuted claims of sabotage. He stated that the delays were due to known issues and that the Ningo-Prampram MP was aware of these factors.

    In response to the ongoing developments, Speaker Bagbin reassured the public that the bill would be passed before Parliament adjourns for the Christmas and New Year break.

    “I know that nobody in this House is opposed to the bill and I know the bill will see the light of day before we rise because the people of Ghana are expecting us to pass the bill before we go on recess. Failure to do so will have serious consequences on members as they want to advance in their political careers,” he said.

  • Our anti-LGBTQ bill no different from Florida, Kenturky laws – Sam George replies US Ambassador

    Our anti-LGBTQ bill no different from Florida, Kenturky laws – Sam George replies US Ambassador

    Member of Parliament representing Ningo-Prampram, Sam Nartey George, has quashed concerns raised by US Ambassador to Ghana, Virginia Palmer, regarding the enactment of Ghana’s Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill (commonly known as the anti-LGBTQI bill).

    During the US-Ghana Business Expo held in Accra on August 10, 2023, Ambassador Palmer cautioned that any form of discrimination against LGBTQ individuals could convey an unfavorable message to American investors at large, and therefore, should be avoided.

    “Ghana is a very welcoming, tolerant society, lots of interreligious, interethnic harmony, and that is what makes Ghana strong, stable, and attractive for investment. I hope it stays that way with regards to the LGBT community.

    “And again, there is money to be made if the colour of your money is green or red; it is Ghanaian, but if there is discrimination or worse, then that will send a signal to not just LGBT investors but other American investors that Ghana is less welcoming than I am telling people that it is now. So, I hope it will stay welcoming,” she told journalists.

    But reacting to her comment, Sam Nartey George noted that there is very little likelihood for that happening as businesses continue to thrive in the US despite the implementation of anti-LGBTQ laws in some states.

    “I am confident it should not be a worry as our intended legislation is NOT different from American laws in states like Florida and Kentucky. I believe the US Supreme Court agrees largely with Ghana’s position,” he wrote.

    He also expressed disappointment in the US ambassador for suggesting that values play no role in business investment by investors.

    “You have expressed fears that investors from the US would not find Ghana attractive if we as Ghanaians uphold our values and reject the depravity of LGBTQI. I find that really surprising.

    “Are American investors looking to invest in a country and with partners who have no values? I thought the basic test of a potential partner is integrity and values. Ghana, as you know, is very intolerant of religious extremism. Has that made American investors wary of Ghana as an intolerant investment destination?” the MP quizzed.

    View Sam George’s full post below:

    Dear Virginia Palmer, US Ambassador to Ghana, I have seen videos of your comments at the US-Ghana Business Summit.

    You have expressed fears that investors from the US would not find Ghana attractive if we as Ghanaians uphold our values and reject the depravity of LGBTQI. I find that really surprising.

    Are American investors looking to invest in a Country and with partners who have no values? I thought the basic test of a potential partner is integrity and values? Ghana as you know is very intolerant of religious extremism.

    Has that made American investors wary of Ghana as an intolerant investment destination?

    Let me reassure you and the U.S. Embassy Ghana that Ghana remains welcoming and open to American investors as a stable, viable democracy. We welcome investors who value the principles of integrity and respect the cultural values of their partners.

    I am confident it should not be a worry as our intended legislation is NOT different from American laws in states like Florida and Kentucky. I believe the US Supreme Court agrees largely with Ghana’s position.

    Cheers to a mutually beneficial business relationship between Ghana and the US.

  • World Bank: Uganda’s anti-LGBTQ bill is inconsistent with our principles

    World Bank: Uganda’s anti-LGBTQ bill is inconsistent with our principles

    The World Bank has rendered an explanation as to why Uganda’s anti-LGBTQ bill contravenes its principles.

    Unfortunately the institution has made a decision to halts financial aids to Uganda as a result of their stance on LGBTQ.

    Details of the statement are here below:

    In relation to Uganda, the World Bank Group has issued the subsequent communication:

    The principles upheld by the World Bank Group are in direct contrast to Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act.

    Our conviction is that our mission to eliminate poverty on a sustainable planet can only prosper if it encompasses individuals of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation.

    This legislation undermines the strides we are making in this direction. Our endeavors worldwide are rooted in the ideals of inclusivity and non-discrimination.

    Upon the immediate enactment of this law, the World Bank promptly dispatched a team to Uganda for the purpose of assessing our ongoing initiatives in light of this new legal framework.

    The outcome of this evaluation has determined the necessity for supplementary actions to ensure that our projects adhere to our established environmental and social standards. Our objective revolves around safeguarding sexual and gender minorities against biases and exclusions within the projects we financially support. Deliberations are currently underway with the relevant authorities to implement these actions.

    We shall withhold the presentation of any fresh public funding for Uganda to our Board of Executive Directors until the effectiveness of these supplementary measures has been verified.

    To a significant degree, the introduction of external oversight and mechanisms for addressing grievances will empower us to take remedial measures whenever deemed necessary.

    The World Bank Group boasts a longstanding and mutually beneficial rapport with Uganda. Our commitment to aiding all Ugandans in their pursuit of escaping poverty, accessing essential services, and enhancing their quality of life remains unwavering, encompassing each and every individual without exception.

  • Duma in Russia supports ban on transgender as part of wider crackdown on LGBTQ rights

    Duma in Russia supports ban on transgender as part of wider crackdown on LGBTQ rights

    As part of a slew of new anti-LGBTQ regulations in Russia, the State Duma, or lower house of parliament, has approved a new law that outlaws practically all medical assistance for transgender people, including gender reassignment surgery.

    The bill, which was read for the third and last time on Friday, forbids doctors from performing gender reassignment procedures unless they are necessary to correct a child’s innate physiological defects. Additionally, it prevents registry offices from changing official documents based on gender transition medical certificates.

    Before becoming effective, the measure still needs to be passed by the Federation Council and signed by Vladimir Putin.

    Amendments made for its third reading include disqualifying individuals who have undergone gender changes from becoming adoptive parents or guardians, as well as the possibility of annulling a marriage if one or both spouses undergo a gender change and update their civil status records.

    Putin has toughened anti-LGTBQ legislation in recent months, as the Kremlin clamps down on free speech and human rights amid the war in Ukraine.

    These recent legal developments in Russia expand the constraints on the LGBTQ community and reflect a tightening of regulations and control over transgender rights in the country.

    In December 2022, Russia expanded its existing “gay propaganda” law to exert control over public discussions and narratives surrounding non-heterosexual relationships and identities. The package of amendments signed by Putin includes heavier penalties for anyone promoting “non-traditional sexual relations and/or preferences,” as well as gender transition.

    Russia’s first transgender politician, Yulia Alyoshina, has warned of the severe consequences of the proposed transgender bill.

    “Once the bill becomes law, the repercussions will be harsh, as transgender individuals will be denied the right for medical care, which is constitutionally guaranteed,” Alyoshina told CNN.

    “This bill is not just discriminatory, it is a real genocide of transgender people,” she added.

    In October, amid the hearings on “LGBTQ propaganda” law amendments and the bill passing its first reading in the State Duma, Alyoshina, who obtained her new passport in 2020, resigned from her position as a regional head of the Civic Initiative party and chose to end her political career.

    The latest restrictions seem to be closely intertwined with the ongoing dissent on the political and human rights activity in Russia.

    Notably, on the eve of the final reading, Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) announced it had detained a transgender activist on suspicion of treason.

    The FSB alleged that the activist, a Russian citizen from the Oryol region, supported the Armed Forces of Ukraine by providing financial assistance through a donation to the independent human rights monitoring group OVD-Info.

    The Russian state labeled OVD-Info a foreign agent in 2021 under a law that critics say suppresses dissent. The group has continued to document alleged rights abuses inside Russia and expanded its mandate to help anti-war protesters following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

  • Tbilisi Pride terminated as protestors invaded the event and burnt flags

    Tbilisi Pride terminated as protestors invaded the event and burnt flags

    A Pride festival in Tbilisi, Georgia, was forced to be evacuated in its entirety by thousands of anti-LGBTQ+ demonstrators.

    Police fought to contain the flow of trespassers as rainbow flags were smashed.

    Due to the turmoil, the event was called off, and guests were bulk evacuated to safety.

    In Georgia, the LGBTQ+ community has long struggled for inclusion.

    Co-director of Tbilisi Pride, Mariam Kvaratskhelia, confirmed all the event’s participants had been safely moved to a different area.

    But she went on to criticise the authorities’ policing of the Pride event, which she said had been held in private for a second consecutive year to reduce the risk of such violent protests.

    Anti-LGBTQ protesters who managed to break through the police cordon make a bonfire in the area designated for the Tbilisi Pride Fest, in Tbilisi, Georgia July 8, 2023. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze
    The Pride event had been held in private, but a large group was still able to disrupt celebrations (Picture: Reuters)
    Anti-LGBTQ protesters scuffle with police as they try to break into the site of Tbilisi Pride Fest, in Tbilisi, Georgia July 8, 2023. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze
    Police – some simply wearing a black top and a cap – scuffle with protesters (Picture: Reuters)
    Anti-LGBTQ protesters who managed to break through the police cordon put a European Union flag into a bonfire in the area designated for the Tbilisi Pride Fest, in Tbilisi, Georgia July 8, 2023. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze
    A European Union flag was thrown into a bonfire at one stage (Picture: Reuters)
    TBILISI, GEORGIA - JULY 8: Police take security measures at an anti-LGBT protest in Georgia's capital Tbilisi, on June 8, 2023. A crowd with Georgian flags and anti-LGBT banners came to a point where a pro-LGBT demo will be held near Lisi Lake and demanded the cancellation of the event. (Photo by Davit Kachkachishvili/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
    The police response to the aggression has been criticised (Picture: Davit Kachkachishvili/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

    Ms Kvaratskhelia said far-right groups had publicly incited violence against LGBTQ+ activists in the days leading up to the Pride events.

    She added: ‘I definitely think this (disruption) was a preplanned, coordinated action between the government and the radical groups… We think this operation was planned in order to sabotage the EU candidacy of Georgia.’

    Protesters reportedly stayed and drank champagne following the evacuation, according to the Pride event organisers.

    Earlier today, a government minister said it was a difficult event to police as it was held in an open area, near a lake.

    Anti-LGBTQ protesters scuffle with police as they try to break into the site of Tbilisi Pride Fest, in Tbilisi, Georgia July 8, 2023. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze
    Huge crowds of protesters had descended on the Pride event (Picture: Reuters)
    Anti-LGBTQ protesters who managed to break through the police cordon make a bonfire in the area designated for the Tbilisi Pride Fest, in Tbilisi, Georgia July 8, 2023. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze
    Signs, flags and posters were destroyed in the chaos (Picture: Reuters)

    Deputy Interior Minister Alexander Darakhvelidze told reporters: ‘The protesters managed to find… ways to enter the area of the event, but we were able to evacuate the Pride participants and organisers,” Deputy Interior Minister Alexander Darakhvelidze told reporters.

    ‘Nobody was harmed during the incident and police are now taking measures to stabilise the situation.’

    Georgia’s President Salome Zourabichvili, a frequent critic of the government, echoed the criticism of the police, saying officers had failed in their duty to uphold people’s right to assemble safely.

    The country is in the midst of political discourse concerning its future and shifts in society.

    Georgia aspires to join the European Union, but its ruling Georgian Dream Party has faced increased criticism from rights groups and the EU over its perceived drift towards authoritarianism.

    After violent street protests in March, it withdrew a Russian-style bill that would have required non-government organisations receiving more than 20% of their funding from abroad to register as ‘agents of foreign influence’.

    Georgia has passed laws against discrimination and hate crimes, but LGBT+ rights groups say there is a lack of adequate protection by law enforcement officials and homophobia remains widespread in the socially conservative South Caucasus nation.

    Two years ago, several journalists were beaten during attacks on LGBT+ activists in Tbilisi.

    One of the journalists, cameraman Alexander Lashkarava, was later found dead at his home, sparking angry protests in the Georgian capital.

    Tamaz Sozashvili, a co-founder of Tbilisi Pride,previously told Metro.co.uk that the riots remain the ‘scariest day of my life’.

    He said: ‘It took me a few months to recover from the stress. I didn’t want to go out and show up in public spaces to socialize because of disappointment, hopelessness, and anger.

    ‘A violent gang chased the organizers of Tbilisi Pride, including myself, to kill us and ransacked the offices of Tbilisi Pride and our partner Shame Movement, but the government failed either to prevent or to bring perpetrators to justice.’