Tag: ‘Agya Koo

  • Ghana’s economy faced a $9 bn crisis from arbitration claims – AG

    Ghana’s economy faced a $9 bn crisis from arbitration claims – AG

    Attorney-General (AG) and Minister of Justice, Godfred Yeboah Dame, has disclosed that the nation’s economy was at risk of collapse due to arbitration claims against the government, which threatened to cost the country nearly $9 billion over the past four years.

    However, Dame emphasized that the timely dismissal of these arbitration claims ultimately safeguarded Ghana’s economy from a potentially catastrophic collapse.

    Mr. Dame said, “Over the past four years, the value of arbitral cases against the Republic has been in excess of $9 billion, and I will cite a few examples to illustrate the point. One such case was the financial claim by ENI Vitol against Ghana, which was initially $7 billion and subsequently reduced to $915 million after Ghana successfully challenged the proceedings in court. In fact, any of these amounts could have collapsed the Ghanaian economy.”

    During the Public Sector Law Conference in Accra on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, Mr. Godfred Dame warned that Ghana’s economy could face severe consequences if arbitration claims against the government are not effectively managed.

    “There are certain glaring dangers that I think arbitration portends for Ghana and the developing world which seem to be overlooked. Whilst arbitration is touted to assure neutrality, privacy, and efficiency in the adjudication of disputes, arbitral claims filed against the government, if not diligently managed, tend to collapse the entire Ghanaian economy.”

    Mr. Godfred Dame outlined several key arbitration cases during his speech, including the 2020 dispute between Ghana and the International Finance Corporation (IFC), which had invested in Ghana’s energy sector.

    He also referenced a 2019 case between the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC) and Aker Energy, a Norwegian oil company, concerning an exploration agreement in deep-water offshore oil fields.

    Another notable case cited by Mr. Dame was a 2018 dispute between the Government of Ghana and Kosmos Energy over the interpretation and application of tax provisions in an offshore oil exploration contract.

    He emphasized that in just four years, arbitral claims against Ghana had totaled over $9 billion. However, Mr. Dame assured that a potential economic collapse was prevented thanks to the successful defense efforts by his office.

    Additionally, Mr. Dame highlighted a domestic arbitral case where his defense successfully saved the country from a potential loss of GHC10 trillion.

    “In point of fact, over the past four years, the value of arbitral claims against the Republic has been over US$9 billion. I cite a few examples to illustrate the point:

    a. The financial claim by ENI/Vitol against Ghana was initially US$7 billion and subsequently reduced to US$915 million after a challenge in the course of the proceedings by Ghana. Any of these amounts (US$7 billion or US$915 million) could have collapsed the Ghanaian economy. By the Grace of God, this financial claim was recently dismissed in its entirety by the international arbitration tribunal.

    b. Cassius Mining Ltd’s claim against the Government of Ghana has a value of about US$300 million.

    Mr. Dame also mentioned the ongoing arbitral claim involving GCNet, which amounts to over GHC4 billion, roughly equivalent to US$250 million.

    Additionally, he referenced the recently filed arbitration claim by Eland against the Government of Ghana, which seeks a minimum of US$320 million.

    “These are just a sample of a few of the international arbitration claims against Ghana. Domestically, there have been claims in excess of over GHC10 trillion successfully defended by the Office of the Attorney-General against the State,” Mr. Dame said.

  • AG gets 7-day grace period to file statement in Anti-LGBTQ case

    AG gets 7-day grace period to file statement in Anti-LGBTQ case

    The Supreme Court of Ghana has provided the Attorney General’s Department with an extension, granting them an additional seven days to file their statement of case in the ongoing legal dispute involving journalist and private legal practitioner Richard Dela Sky and the Speaker of Parliament.

    This case addresses the controversial Ghanaian Family Values Bill, which has raised significant constitutional questions.

    During the court proceedings, the State Attorney requested the court to compel the Speaker’s legal team to submit a Financial Impact Analysis report concerning the Family Values Bill.

    The State Attorney argued that this analysis is vital, as it could significantly influence the case’s outcome by highlighting the financial implications of the proposed legislation.

    Richard Dela Sky, the plaintiff, is challenging the bill on constitutional grounds, asserting that it violates fundamental human rights protected by the Ghanaian Constitution, including equality and freedom from discrimination.

    He argued that the Family Values Bill could lead to increased discrimination against marginalized groups, particularly the LGBTQ+ community, and undermine the dignity of individuals.

    Moreover, Dela Sky is seeking an order from the Supreme Court to restrain the President from assenting to the bill, contending that doing so would violate constitutional safeguards for the rights and liberties of Ghanaians.

    The State Attorney highlighted the importance of the Financial Impact Analysis, stating that it would provide insight into the potential economic consequences of the bill’s implementation and its alignment with the national budget and social services.

  • Charges filed by AG against detained #OccupyJulorbiHouse protesters

    Charges filed by AG against detained #OccupyJulorbiHouse protesters

    The arrest of 39 individuals during an anti-galamsey protest by the Democracy Hub in Accra has generated significant headlines both locally and internationally, following widespread public outrage over their continued detention.

    Court documents indicate that the Office of the Attorney General has assumed responsibility for prosecuting the arrested protesters, who face allegations of lawlessness during the demonstration that took place from September 21 to September 22, 2024.

    The documents reveal various charges filed against different groups of protesters. Among those listed are Oliver Barker-Vormawor, a leading figure in the Democracy Hub, along with 12 others, facing seven charges that include unlawful assembly and breach of peace.

    “OLIVER BARKER-VORMAWOR, CEDERIC BANSAH, MICHAEL AMOFA EMMANUEL OFFEL: NII AYI: FRED BOATENG, DEPORTEE IDDRISU YUSIF WENDLE: FANNY OTOO, SAMUEL SAMAKOR; FELICITY NELSON, NANA AMO MENSAH PREMPEH, THOMAS YEBOAH, on or about 22 September, 2024 in Accra in the Greater Accra Region of the Republic of Ghana, conducted yourself in a manner which occasioned a breach of the peace.

    “OLIVER BARRKER-VORMAWOR, CEDERIC BANSAH MICHAEL AMOFA: EMMANUEL OFFEL NII AYI FRED BOATENG, DEPORTEE IDDRISU YUSIE WENDLE FANNY OTOO, SAMUEL SAMAKOR, FELICITY NELSON, NANA AMO MENSAH PREMPEIE THOMAS YEBOAH on or about 22 September, 2024 in Accra in the Greater Accra Region of the Republic of Ghana, obstructed the police in the execution of their public duty of maintaining peate and security,” parts of the document reads.

    A second court document, which listed Raphael Afful Williams and 9 other protesters, had 3 charges including unlawful assembly contrary to the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29) and causing unlawful damage contrary to section 172(1)(a) of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29).

    “RAPHAEL AFFUL WILLIAMS, RAZAK SULEMAN, GERALD DELIM, COMRAD ABUBAKAR SADEEQ, BILAL MOHAMMED, EBENEZER ANKOMANYI OKYERE, NORGBEDZI KELVIN, PRISCILLA TOBILI, MOHAMMED KING HASSAN, TANKO NABONG, ALIAS BLACK PYRAMID, on or about 22nd September, 2024, in Accra in the Greater Accra Region of the Republic of Ghana, assembled with intent to commit a breach of the peace.

    “RAPHAEL AFFUL WILLIAMS, RAZAK SULEMAN, GERALD DELIM, COMRAD ABUBAKAR SADEEQ, BILAL MOHAMMED, EBENEZER ANKOMANYI OKYERE, NORGBEDZI KELVIN, PRISCILLA TOBILI, MOHAMMED KING HASSAN, TANKO NABONG, ALIAS BLACK PYRAMID, on or about 22nd September, 2024, in Accra in the Greater Accra Region of the Republic of Ghana, caused damage to billboards and paraphernalia belonging to political parties,” part of the document reads.

    See the full charges below:

  • I’ve endured the trials my office – AG

    I’ve endured the trials my office – AG

    The Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Godfred Yeboah Dame, has expressed his resilience in the face of numerous criticisms aimed at him for his professional conduct.

    Addressing the 2024/2025 Annual General Conference of the Ghana Bar Association, Mr. Yeboah Dame asserted that he is among the most effective Attorneys-General Ghana has ever had.

    He highlighted his achievements over the past three years, stating that he has successfully led the Bar through significant developments.

    “However, I have braved the challenges of the office and remained undaunted because I love the law and I love utilising the law as an instrument for the developing Ghanaian society. With courage and strength, I have taken the slings and arrows of critical free media even when they are unjustified or wrong.

    “Whatever I have done since 2021, I have done it in the best interest of Ghana and state attorneys and staff at the Law Office.”

    He emphasized that his actions since 2021 have always been in the best interests of Ghana and the staff at the Law Office, reinforcing his dedication to his role.

  • There must be open justice – AG tells Bar

    There must be open justice – AG tells Bar

    The Attorney-General (AG), Godfred Dame, has called on members of the legal fraternity to uphold the principle of open justice in Ghana.

    Speaking at the Annual Conference of the Ghana Bar Association, Mr Dame emphasized that transparency in legal proceedings is crucial for maintaining public trust and ensuring that the judiciary operates fairly and effectively.

    He further urged lawyers and judges to ensure that court proceedings are conducted in a manner that allows for public scrutiny.

    According to the AG, while certain cases may require discretion due to their sensitive nature, the default position should be openness and accountability.

    He stressed that judges should not be seen as adversaries of the people or the government. Rather, their role is to balance the restraint of power with the support of rightful government actions.

    Mr Dame acknowledged that while the United States Supreme Court does not permit full live telecasts of its proceedings, Ghana has made commendable strides in this area.

    “Our Judiciary must embrace the concept of open justice by publishing and explaining decisions and by allowing access to the courts – in person and through broadcasts. It is for this reason that I am proud to state that as Attorney-General, I have led in this quest of ensuring open justice in Ghana as a way of dispelling misconceptions, misinterpretations and misrepresentations of court decisions by making formal applications to the Chief Justice for live broadcast of particular court proceedings of overwhelming public interest,” he added.

  • Ghana School of Law in hot waters for procurement violations

    Ghana School of Law in hot waters for procurement violations

    The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has called on the Electoral Commission (EC) to urgently provide the provisional voter register for the upcoming December 7 general elections to all political parties before the start of the exhibition exercise.

    Dr. Omane Boamah, the NDC’s Director of Elections, took to Facebook to accuse the EC of both incompetence and intentional delays, alleging that this is an attempt to deliver an inadequate voter register to the political parties.

    Boamah raised alarm about the situation, cautioning that the ongoing delays and what he described as the EC’s poor management could potentially lead to serious unrest if not swiftly addressed.

    “Deeply concerned that the posturing and incompetence of the EC and its IT Department can plunge Ghana into anarchy if not remedied immediately.”

    Below is the full statement.

    The EC must release the Provisional Voter Register (PVR) now!

    With just six (6) days to the 2024 EXHIBITION of the Provisional Voter Register (PVR), political parties are yet to receive the register.

    We strongly believe this lack of promptness exhibited by the EC is due to both incompetence and a deliberate attempt to dump a sub-standard Provisional Voter Register on political parties in a short period, to make it difficult for interested parties to critically peruse the register before the Exhibition starts, next week.

    The EC wrote to the NDC on the 18th of July 2024, requesting that we bring an external drive (2 terabytes) for the PVR to be loaded for us.

    We responded to their request by submitting the external drive with additional requests for all 16 regional register code books.

    Unfortunately, for well over two weeks, the EC refused to honour their obligation per CI 91 as amended by CI 126.

    Caught with this, the EC surprisingly wrote to us on the 8th of August 2024 now saying they will release the PVR on the 14th of August 2024, six clear days to the exhibition exercise which starts next week on the 20th of August 2024.

    This is grossly unfair!

    To make matters worse, we are told that today (the 14th of August) we will not receive the Provisional Voter Register until Friday, 16th August 2024. Leaving us with only six (6) days to package and dispatch the register to the over 38,000 Polling stations across Ghana to aid in pre-exhibition scrutiny of the register.

    We are aware of the dysfunctional IT Department of the EC, for which we earlier called on the UNDP (@ IPAC) to extend a helping hand to.

    The EC has refused and has since not followed up with the UNDP for technical support. Yet, the (deliberate) mistakes keep recurring.

    We are deeply concerned that the posturing and incompetence of the EC and its IT Department can plunge Ghana into anarchy if not remedied immediately.

    Recall the chaotic 2023 District Assembly Elections, the recent network failures during the Limited Registration Exercise, as well as Transfers and Proxies.

    These have exposed the inefficiencies and ineffectiveness of the EC.

    This deliberate attempt to disturb the electoral roll in order to benefit one political party will be resisted!

    Already, the Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) kits stolen at the headquarters of the Electoral Commission under CCTV surveillance have still not been found. Have the stolen BVR kits been used to dump illegally registered voters onto the voter register?

    The sanctity of our electoral system must be upheld at all times irrespective of who is in power!

    We call on CSOs, religious bodies, and diplomatic missions to take an interest in the activities of this current EC because (beyond verbal assurances) the Commission is not SHOWING a commitment to deliver credible elections on December 07 2024.

    The EC must release the Provisional Voter Register now!

  • Regional airports raised GHS13.13m revenue and spent GHS39.14m in 2022 – AG

    Regional airports raised GHS13.13m revenue and spent GHS39.14m in 2022 – AG

    A recent Auditor-General’s report has highlighted financial results for the five regional airports in the country.

    The report, which covers the accounts of public boards, corporations, and statutory institutions for 2023, shows that the airports collectively earned GH¢13.13 million in revenue for 2022, while their expenditures totaled GH¢39.14 million.

    This led to a substantial deficit of GH¢26.01 million, prompting a reassessment of strategies to enhance regional airport development and boost economic benefits.

    The airports involved are Kumasi Airport (now Prempeh I International Airport) in the Ashanti Region, Tamale Airport in the Northern Region, Wa Airport in the Upper West Region, Sunyani Airport in the Bono Region, and Ho Airport in the Volta Region.

    A closer look at the financial details reveals Kumasi Airport had expenses of GH¢15.68 million but only generated GH¢8.22 million in revenue.

    Tamale Airport reported revenue of GH¢4.74 million against an expenditure of GH¢15.41 million. Sunyani Airport brought in GH¢95,626.58 in revenue with a spending of GH¢4.53 million.

    Ho Airport did not generate any revenue but had an expenditure of GH¢1.38 million. Wa Airport earned GH¢77,250.48 in revenue while investing GH¢2.15 million in its operations.

    Auditor-General Johnson Akuamoah Asiedu attributed the poor performance to low passenger numbers, a limited number of domestic airlines, and the underutilization of rentable airport facilities.

    The report noted that the airports’ lack of commercial viability is impacting the financial health of Ghana Airports Company Limited (GACL) due to high operational costs and low revenue.

    The report also warned that neglected facilities, like those at Ho Airport, might deteriorate over time.

    To address these challenges, it recommended that GACL management incentivize domestic airlines to use these airports and launch marketing campaigns to attract more travelers.

    Additionally, it suggested finding concessionaires for idle spaces to generate rental income and collaborating with regulatory authorities to ease restrictions for potential airlines while ensuring safety.

    In response, airport management acknowledged the commercial challenges but expressed hope that new infrastructure and international flights could improve viability.

    They stressed that developing these airports aligns with national policy and will create significant job opportunities during and after construction.

    GACL emphasized its role in providing essential social and public services across the country and is committed to investing in regional airports to support national economic growth.

  • Jakpa admits pocketing €700k (28.7%) out of Ambulance money

    Jakpa admits pocketing €700k (28.7%) out of Ambulance money

    Richard Jakpa, the businessman accused of causing financial loss of €2.37 million to the state in an ambulance deal with the Minority leader, Ato Forson has admitted that his company received 28.7% of the amount paid by the government to Big Sea under the Ambulance contract.

    This amounts to approximately €700,000.

    Mr Jakpa made this admission during cross-examination by the Attorney General (AG), Godfred Yeboah Dame.

    When questioned about the Agency Agreement signed with Big Sea Limited, which entitled him to 10% of all monies paid under the Ambulance Contract, Mr Jakpa responded,”That is so but it is not my total entitlement. I was entitled to more by other clauses under the Agreement”.

    Mr. Dame further pressed, “Out of the about €2.3 million paid by the Government to Big Sea under the Ambulance Contract, you and Jakpa at Business earned 28.7% of it. In fact, about €700,000 was paid to you.”

    Jakpa stated “Yes, that was the amount paid to Jakpa at Business as an Agent”.

    Additionally, Mr Jakpa refuted allegations that he approached Big Sea for the purchase of ambulances after receiving parliamentary approval.

    He clarified that Big Sea was already known to the Ministry of Health and Ministry of Finance prior to the approval.

    He pointed out that the agency agreement between Big Sea and Jakpa@business Limited was established on May 24, 2011, whereas parliamentary approval for the ambulance procurement occurred on November 1, 2012, more than a year later.

    The ongoing trial involves a former Deputy Minister of Finance and the Minority Leader, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, alongside a former Chief Director of the Ministry of Health, Sylvester Anemana, and Richard Jakpa.

    They have been accused of causing financial loss of €2.37 million to the state in a deal to purchase 200 ambulances for the country between 2014 and 2016.

    Dr. Forson, who is also the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Member of Parliament for Ajumako Enyan Esiam and the Ranking Member on the Finance Committee of Parliament, faces charges alongside his co-accused.

    On November 19, 2012, Mr Anemana is said to have written to the Public Procurement Authority (PPA) seeking approval to engage Big Sea through single sourcing for the supply of 200 ambulances.

    By an agreement dated December 19, 2012, the Ministry of Health formally contracted Big Sea General Trading, based in Dubai, for the supply of 200 Mercedes Benz ambulances at a contract sum of €15.8 million, with a unit price of €79,000.

    The delivery terms stipulated that the first batch of 25 vehicles should be delivered within 120 days of the agreement, with the remaining 175 vehicles to be delivered in batches of 25 every 30 days.

  • Ambulance Case: Be brave and stand in the witness box – Edudzi Tameklo dares AG

    Ambulance Case: Be brave and stand in the witness box – Edudzi Tameklo dares AG

    The Head of Legal Affairs for the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Edudzi Tameklo, has issued a bold challenge to Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame.

    Tameklo urged Dame to take the witness stand and testify under oath about his involvement in the ongoing case, questioning Dame’s willingness to do so.

    This challenge comes in response to recent comments made by Dame during a town hall meeting with Ghanaian residents in the United Kingdom (UK), where Dame dismissed the NDC’s arguments, including an audio recording of his conversation with Richard Jakpa, the third accused in the trial.

    Dame claimed that the NDC’s allegations fell apart during Jakpa’s cross-examination.

    In an interview with Citi News, Tameklo suggested that Dame’s reluctance to testify raises suspicions.

    “If the Attorney General was doing what is right, why was he worried about being recorded? This bravery from a safe distance should be dismissed with alacrity. You leave Ghana, go to London, and start making noise,” he stated.

    Tameklo also highlighted an undisputed meeting between Dame, Jakpa, and a Supreme Court Justice, questioning Dame’s silence on the matter.

    Tameklo challenged Godfred Dame’s integrity, saying, “If he is a man, nothing stops him from taking the witness stand. Let him declare, ‘I am Godfred Yeboah Dame, the leader of the Bar and the Attorney General of the Republic, and I am taking the witness stand.’”

    “You have not disputed that there was a meeting between yourself, Richard Jakpa, and the respected Justice of the Supreme Court. You have not denied it. So, my question to him is, in the absence of any denial on oath from him, which of these stories should be believed?”

  • Court to decide on accepting leaked tape involving AG, Richard Jakpa on June 16

    Court to decide on accepting leaked tape involving AG, Richard Jakpa on June 16

    The High Court, presided over by Justice Afia Serwah Asare Botwe, has scheduled Thursday, June 13, to rule on an application submitted by the lawyers of Minority Leader Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson.

    The application aims to admit an audio recording of a conversation between Richard Jakpa and Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame into evidence.

    Dr. Abdul Bassit Bamba, counsel for Dr. Ato Forson, presented the application on Tuesday, arguing that the recording is pertinent to their earlier motion for a mistrial, which the court had dismissed.

    Justice Afia Serwah Asare Botwe requested that the audio tape be played in open court after confirming that all parties had received copies and that the tape had been officially submitted.

    She explained that playing the recording was essential to determine its admissibility as evidence and to ensure that it was the same tape provided to both the prosecution and Dr. Ato Forson’s lawyers.

    After listening to the tape, Director of Public Prosecution Yvonne Attakora Obuobisa objected to its admission into evidence.

    She argued that the recording was irrelevant and violated the Attorney General’s privacy.

    Madam Obuobisa stressed that the court had already considered the tape in its ruling that dismissed the applications filed by both Dr. Ato Forson and Richard Jakpa.

    “We object to the tendering of this recording into evidence. Insufficient foundation has been laid for its inclusion in the ongoing trial. My Lady will note that in its ruling on June 6, this court admitted into evidence this same recording that counsel seeks to tender of the third accused (Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson),” she stated.

  • Opinion: Don’t ‘hang’ the Attorney-General; he did no wrong in law

    Opinion: Don’t ‘hang’ the Attorney-General; he did no wrong in law

    Some members of the public have called for the head of the Attorney-General, Honourable Godfred Dame, following his alleged leaked phone conversation with Richard Jakpa, the third accused in the ongoing ambulance trial.

    The case involves the Minority Leader, Dr Cassiel Ato Forson, Mr. Richard Japka and one other. The Attorney-General has been publicly condemned for allegedly seeking to induce one of the accused persons, Richard Japka,  to testify against the first accused person, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson.

    While some members of the public have charged the Attorney-General with professional misconduct, others have called for his immediate removal from office. Did the Attorney-General go wrong professionally or in law by seeking the cooperation of the third accused against Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson? This article is my contribution to the debate.

    The Attorney-General’s alleged secret engagement with the third accused seems to have shocked most Ghanaians because our traditional understanding of criminal trial is that it is always an adversarial contest between the Republic, represented by the Attorney-General, on the one side, and the accused on the other side.

    In a typical adversarial criminal trial, the Attorney-General and the accused may be said to be ‘opponents’ who are not supposed to engage in conversations and deals, secret or open.

    However, with the introduction of plea bargaining into our law, criminal trial has greatly shed its adversarialism. Today, the Attorney-General and an accused person may eat together from the same bowl, sit together on the same couch, board one vehicle, or chat with each other, all in an attempt to strike a plea deal.

    There is nothing wrong with the Attorney-General having a private conversation with one accused person and seeking his cooperation to prosecute another accused person.

    One of plea bargaining’s greatest advantages is that in syndicated crimes, one accused may enter into an agreement to plead guilty in exchange for a ‘reward’ so that he will assist the Attorney-General to prosecute other accused persons.

    This often happens when the Attorney-General is of the view that more concrete evidence may be obtained from one accused to bolster or augment the case of the prosecution against the ringleader or kingpin in a group crime.

    As a practical matter, when an accused agrees to plead guilty for some reward and cooperate with the prosecution against another accused person, he immediately becomes prosecution witness.

    Once an accused agrees to cooperate with the prosecution, he must assist the case of the prosecution to succeed. This kind of cooperation is common in plea negotiations.

    For instance, under section 71 of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959), the willingness of the accused to cooperate with the prosecution for the arrest and prosecution of other persons involved in corruption or corruption-related offence, is a factor to consider in determining the acceptability of a plea offer.  

    The use of prosecutorial inducements, threats, promises and coercion is an integral part of plea bargaining. The law permits the Attorney-General to threaten harsh punishment or promise lenient punishment or even promise absolute discharge, to induce an accused to plead guilty.

    A prosecutor may adopt strategic overcharging to induce an accused to enter into a plea agreement. Strategic overcharging occurs when the prosecutor deliberately and strategically overcharges the accused person with the view that he will later drop some of the charges if the accused accepts to plead guilty to one or some of the charge(s).

    Many people have argued, albeit wrongly, that what transpired between the Attorney-General and Richard Jakpa was not an attempt to initiate plea negotiation. It must be stressed that before the parties may notify the court of their intention to initiate plea negotiations, they must have engaged in some private conversations outside the court.

    As a practical matter, the Attorney-General and the accused must have private talks to reach a tentative agreement to strike a plea deal before they officially notify the court. Plea bargaining is a consensual arrangement between the Attorney-General and the accused, and each side has the right to make any offer at all.

    Plea bargaining can hardly be initiated without the Attorney-General and the accused engaging in some informal exchanges or conversations behind closed doors. There is therefore nothing wrong with the Attorney-General secretly talking with Richard Japka and seeking his cooperation to prosecute Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson.

    Once Richard Jakpa was not represented by counsel at the time the leaked tape was allegedly made, the Attorney-General was right in communicating with him directly.

    Even though the Attorney-General is a lawyer, his office is a creature of the Constitution (vide article 88 of the Constitution), and therefore not subject to the jurisdiction of the General Legal Council. The Attorney-General derives his authority and power directly from the Constitution. The Attorney-General and state attorneys do not require solicitors’ licence to practice law. Therefore, no case can be made against the Attorney-General before the General Legal Council.

    Clearly, the ongoing ambulance trial is a syndicated crime, and Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson is obviously the alleged kingpin of the crime. It is not wrong for the Attorney-General to target Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson.

    It is also not wrong for the Attorney-General to induce the cooperation of the other accused persons against Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson. Contrary to what some commentators say, the Attorney-General has no legal obligation to explain why he initially rejected Jakpa’s plea offer. The steps an decisions taken by the Attorney-General in this case may irritate the public, but they are neither illegal nor unprofessional. As Justice Kennedy observed in Lafler v. Cooper 131 S. Ct. 856 (2011), at p.1388, the reality is “that criminal justice today is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials.”

    As it may be recalled, the decision of Atto Essien in 2022 to enter into plea bargaining with the Attorney-General in the Capital Bank case attracted the same level of public outcry and condemnation as in this ambulance case.

    The reaction of the public amply shows that many people do not understand the concept and practice of plea bargaining. Like it or not, plea bargaining is part of our law, and we must take it as we find it.

    Maybe we have created a monster that is hunting us. The Attorney-General has the right to use every prosecutorial endeavour to obtain assistance from the other accused person to prosecute Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, even if that means dropping all the charges against the other accused persons.

    Source: Daniel Korang, Adom Legal Consult, Sunyani

    DISCLAIMER: TIGPost.co will not be liable for any inaccuracies contained in this article. The views expressed in the article are solely those of the author’s, and do not reflect those of The Independent Ghana.

  • Focus on tax evasion and stop protecting corrupt State officials – Dr. Amoako Baah to AG

    Focus on tax evasion and stop protecting corrupt State officials – Dr. Amoako Baah to AG

    Political analyst Dr. Richard Amoako Baah has expressed deep concern over the direction taken by the Attorney General regarding public interest matters, particularly those related to corruption.

    In response to a communication between Attorney General Godfred Dame and the CEO of the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) concerning the Cecilia Dapaah case, a former Minister of Sanitation and Water Resources, Dr. Amoako Baah expressed dismay at what he perceives as the AG aligning with individuals engaged in embezzlement.

    The correspondence, stated a lack of evidence implicating Cecilia Dapaah and her husband, Daniel Osei Kufuor, in corruption or procurement breaches.

    However, Dr. Amoako Baah dismissed these assertions as unfounded and an attempt to conceal wrongdoing.

    In a statement, Dr. Amoako Baah denounced the AG’s stance as baseless and corrupt, asserting that unexplained wealth should be presumed illicit until proven otherwise. He questioned the AG’s motives and accused him of siding with those implicated in corruption.

    “The AG’s assertions are baseless, nonsensical, and a corrupt attempt to cover-up, which every juror or logical person would treat with contempt. Would the AG venture to tell us where her great wealth came from, as others have shamefully suggested it came from funeral donations or family inheritance, even though the family is as poor as others? If he can’t, then it can safely be assumed to be from her official duties. If that is the case, it is illegally acquired wealth, called bribes, kickbacks, side dealing, or other ways they are referred to. They are all the children of corruption!

    “Unsubstantiated source of cash must be automatically assumed guilty until legal or reasonable substantiation makes it not guilty,” he said in a statement.

    Moreover, Dr. Amoako Baah called into question President Akufo-Addo’s response to the situation, warning that failure to address the case would cast doubt on the President’s integrity as a lawyer.

    “I don’t see where the AG’s illegality stems from. The AG, who should at least be looking at issues like tax evasion, has joined in the protection of the looters of the state. This is a bogus attempt for further corruption. EOCO must disregard this advice since the Special Prosecutor is legally right.

    “If the President sits idly by and allows this to go on, where are his credentials as a good lawyer? He has become part of the endemic corruption that is killing the country. For once, do what we worked so hard to elect you president for: PROTECT THE PUBLIC PURSE,” he added.

    The investigation into Cecilia Dapaah stemmed from allegations of substantial sums of money being stolen from her residence by domestic workers in 2023. Despite the involvement of the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP), concerns persist regarding the handling of the case.

  • Persons who facilitated marriage between Gborbu Wulomo and minor will be dealt with – Deputy AG

    Persons who facilitated marriage between Gborbu Wulomo and minor will be dealt with – Deputy AG

    The Attorney-General’s Office is determined to take firm action against anyone implicated in the alleged customary marriage involving 63-year-old Ga priest, Nuumo Borketey Laweh Tsuru XXXIII and 16-year-old Naa Ayemuede.

    Deputy Attorney-General, Alfred Tuah-Yeboah has stated that the subsequent steps will hinge upon the outcomes of the police investigation.

    On Tuesday, April 2, the AG’s office instructed the Police Criminal Investigation Department (CID) to conduct a thorough probe into the reported marriage.

    Mr Tuah-Yeboah emphasized that the department is closely monitoring developments in the case, emphasizing Ghana’s commitment to upholding the rule of law.

    “Ghana is a nation of laws. We have various laws regulating how children are to be treated. We are not passing judgment at this stage. What we are seeking to do is to involve the law enforcement agencies, the Ghana Police Service especially, in investigating the matter and if at the end of the day, there is evidence that someone can be charged for an offence under our law, we will go after that person and charge that person.

    “But for now, we are also seeking and depending on the things that we are able to conduct, and get evidence, then we can take a step further.”

  • I want to meet my son Agya Koo – Alleged father

    I want to meet my son Agya Koo – Alleged father

    A man purporting to be the biological father of popular Kumawood actor, ‘Agya Koo’, has been spotted on social media.

    The old man, identified as Kwesi Bediako, is seeking a reconciliation with his son, whom he had not seen since birth.

    According to Mr. Bediako, he and the actor’s mother met and started a relationship during his working days at Meridian Hotel in Tema.

    He said they had been together for a while until she informed him that she was pregnant and bolted afterward.

    In an interview with Ghana News TV, monitored by GhanaWeb, Mr. Bediako said he is seeking every means possible to get in touch with his son.

    “After Agya Koo’s mother and I met in Tema during work, we started a relationship and she later informed me that she was pregnant. She gave birth and named the child Kofi Adu but I wasn’t aware. I had not seen her and my child since.

    “My name is Agya Koo, so there is no doubt that my son adopted that name. It is no coincidence. I have heard different stories about his mother’s whereabouts. Some say she is dead; others say she is still alive, I don’t know.

    “As for my son, I didn’t know what he looked like until I bought one of his movies. Life is extremely hard for me. So, everybody is asking me to go and find my son and make amends because now he is a successful man. they have encouraged me to find him because he could transform my life for the better. He could help ease my present suffering as a farmer,” he established.

    He also stated some reasons that initially deterred him from reaching out to his son.

    “Initially I badly wanted to meet him but I was shy. I held back because I was skeptical about how he would receive me. I was scared he might not accept me because I wasn’t there for him while he was suffering. Also, how he acts on TV, tells me he could be a difficult person. All these things scare me,” he stated.

    Earlier in 2013, the veteran actor denied a 50-year-old woman who claimed to be his biological mother on a radio station in the Ashanti region.

    “My mother died 7 years ago…I don’t know that woman,” he expressed during a phone-in interview.

    Meanwhile, Agya Koo is yet to comment on the new development regarding his ‘lost and found’ father.