Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has rejected a petition filed by businessman Richard Jakpa, claiming unfair treatment and rights violations during his trial in the controversial ambulance procurement case.
Mr. Jakpa, the third accused in the ongoing trial, had sought the transfer of trial judge Afia Serwaa Botwe, citing perceived bias and mistreatment.
In his petition, Mr. Jakpa alleged that he had been denied basic rights and fair treatment throughout the trial proceedings. He accused the judge of bias, denying him legal representation, and even restricting his access to necessary facilities like restroom breaks.
However, Chief Justice Torkornoo, responding to Mr. Jakpa’s concerns, stated that he had failed to provide substantial evidence to support his claims of unfair treatment.
The Chief Justice pointed out that Mr. Jakpa’s allegations lacked sufficient backing from court records or other substantiating evidence.
In an interview with JoyNews following the Chief Justice’s decision, Mr. Jakpa expressed shock at the dismissal of his petition.
He criticized the Chief Justice for not independently verifying his claims by reviewing court recordings and other trial proceedings.
“I got a response from the Chief Justice, a surprise response that I didn’t provide evidence so she cannot transfer the judge. She didn’t say what I am saying is not true,” Mr. Jakpa stated, highlighting his disappointment with the outcome.
Mr. Jakpa’s allegations have stirred controversy surrounding the fairness and conduct of the trial, which involves allegations of corruption and mismanagement in the procurement of ambulances.
Despite his claims, the trial continues with Mr. Jakpa and other defendants facing serious charges related to the misuse of public funds.
The Chief Justice’s decision underscores the importance of substantiating allegations with concrete evidence in legal petitions, especially when challenging the conduct of judicial proceedings.