On Wednesday, May 8, 2024, During the Supreme Court’s sitting on the anti-LGBT+ Bill, Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo had a flurry of conversations with a senior attorney.
Attorney Thaddeus Sory represented Speaker of the House of Parliament Alban Bagbin, a respondent in both of the instances that came before the highest court.
“I am not impressed with what you are doing,” the CJ said at a point when her exchanges with Sory kept dragging over a preliminary objection the lawyer sought to raise against a request by the petitioners.
“You can hear me very well, you appreciate the pickle we are in? You filed an affidavit on the 15th of … please hold on,” she said as Sory gave crisp responses to her submissions.
“Don’t interrupt me, please, always wait for me to land,” the CJ stressed before adding: “Your substantive affidavit before us is dated 2nd of April, listen, let me land.
“If you had waited to understand my words instead of rushing to justify yourself, you would have admitted that you didn’t have a formal notice to object,” a position the lawyer appeared to disagree with.
Sory was given the chance to speak up when the Chief Justice questioned the attorney about the “legality” of his viewpoint.
“The legality lies in the fact that the motion paper invoked the jurisdiction of the court and if there is an irregularity on the face of the motion paper, i.e. his motion for injunction,” he submitted.