The Global Intelligence and Security Analysis Center (GISAC) has rebuked security analyst Dr. Adam Bonaa for labeling the Economic and Organized Crime Office (EOCO) as the epicenter of corruption. GISAC criticized Bonaa’s remarks as unfounded and lacking moral integrity.
In a statement signed by Executive Director Samuel Nana Appiah Owusu, GISAC accused Mr Bonaa of acting in bad faith, alleging personal vendettas against EOCO’s leadership, particularly COP Maame Tiwaa Addo-Danquah.
The statement claims that Bonaa’s criticism stemmed from personal grievances after his unsuccessful attempts to secure contracts and favors from EOCO.
GISAC emphasized that Bonaa’s accusations lacked substantiation and were driven by animosity towards EOCO’s head.
The statement highlighted Bonaa’s failure to provide evidence to support his claims and questioned the validity of his allegations.
The statement concluded by urging the public to dismiss Bonaa’s allegations as baseless and motivated by personal interests rather than genuine concerns about corruption at EOCO.
ADAM BONAA HAS NO MORAL RIGHT TO CALL EOCO A CORRUPT INSTITUTION. HE IS ENGAGED IN PEJORATIVE STIGMATIZATION.
I have read and listened to various articles and interviews both on traditional and social media regarding a claim by Mr. Adam Bonaa ( Security Analyst) to the effect that the headquarters of the Economic and Organized Crime Office (EOCO) has become the corruption headquarters.
I must state here that the claim by Mr. Adam Bonaa is borne out of bad faith and has no merit whatsoever.
Mr. Adam Bonaa made such frivolous claims without substantiating same with any form of evidence. His claim suggests that he has personal banter with the Head of the Institution after his failed attempt to secure contracts and other favors.
I am reliably informed and can say on authority that the allegations against EOCO by Mr Bonaa is borne out of pure hatred against Mrs. Yaa Tiwaa Addo Dankwa, the head of EOCO.
Mr Adam Bonaa upon several attempts to lobby for contracts and favors from the head of EOCO, was told that there was no contract and also no such thing as favors were available for him ( Adam Bonaa).
Is it the case that Mr. Adam Bonaa is peeved and has resorted in denigrating the enviable reputation of the head of the institution and her personality ?
To what extent can he provide evidence to buttress his claim? What other series of corruption cases has he witnessed taking place at the EOCO headquarters? Can one accuse anybody simply because he or she refused to aced to a demand or give in to lobbyists?
Evidence are abundant to prove that Mr. Adam Bonaa’s claim is borne out of bad faith and must be treated with the contempt it deserves. He is hiding behind the call for Parliamentary inquiry into the Cecelia Dapaa’s case to engage in settling personal scores with the head of EOCO for the simple fact that his request for contracts and other favors from the head of the institution was declined.
From the evidence available, I can state without any form of equivocation that Mr. Adam Bonaa has no moral right to allege that EOCO has become the headquarters of corruption.
Mr. Adam Bonaa is rather engaging in pejorative stigmatization.
Useless response