The Attorney General‘s (AG) office has characterized Richard Jakpa‘s attempt to dismiss charges against him as an additional act of public drama used by the third accused to undermine the prosecution against him.
This stance is outlined in the Attorney General’s affidavit opposing the motion.
Jakpa filed the motion on the basis that the Attorney General had misused his authority in pursuing the case against him.
This connects to Jakpa’s assertions that Godfred Yeboah Dame compelled him to testify against the minority leader, ATO FORSON, the primary accused in this matter, during odd hours.
According to Citi News, the Attorney General’s office refutes all accusations against Godfred Dame in the affidavit.
The Attorney General contends that the prosecution is founded on substantial evidence discovered through thorough investigations.
The office argues that the claims in support of the motion are filled with false allegations designed to create unnecessary doubt about the court’s ability to deliver justice in this case.
Additionally, the Attorney General’s office views this motion as part of the accused individuals’ efforts to discredit the prosecution and sow doubt about the court’s integrity.
Despite facing consistent insults and attacks on his integrity, the Attorney General’s office emphasizes its commitment to maintaining professionalism throughout the proceedings.