A recognized security expert, Dr. Adam Bonaa, has expressed his view on the Vigilantism and Offences Act of 2019, characterizing it as a mere symbolic document that has not yielded any discernible or practical outcomes so far.
According to Dr. Bonaa, despite the implementation of the Act, there hasn’t been a single instance of prosecution under its provisions.
This lack of enforcement, in his opinion, underscores the fact that the Act has not fulfilled its intended purpose.
During an interview with the media, Dr. Adam Bonaa stated that he is unsurprised by this outcome, given the circumstances that led to the creation of the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act.
He cited his own involvement as a board member of the Small Arms Commission, providing him with insights into matters related to vigilantism and related offenses.
Dr. Bonaa commented on the genesis of the Vigilantism Act, recalling how it was hastily introduced by the president, who issued a two-week ultimatum for the development of the Act, threatening to involve parliament otherwise.
Highlighting the lack of successful prosecutions under this law, Dr. Bonaa questioned the effectiveness of the legislation.
He pointed out that gun ownership is not a trivial matter, as it involves significant costs. Those who possess firearms typically fall into certain categories, and in his opinion, these individuals should have a greater understanding of the law and its implications.
The conversation on the Legal Agenda, which included Richard Sena Hotor, a legal practitioner, alongside the host, delved into an in-depth discussion about the law and its efficacy in achieving substantial outcomes.